"That's just the way it is" – FDJ - Suez left searching for answers after Demi Vollering fades on Madeleine
Cycling
Demi Vollering's Tour de France Femmes defence has not gone
the way she wanted. The 2023 champion lost significant time on the Col de la
Madeleine, dropping more than three minutes to stage winner Pauline
Ferrand-Prévot. While Vollering had entered the race as the overwhelming
favorite for both the general classification and yesterday's queen stage, her
performance raised immediate questions. Having crashed hard earlier on in the
race, it looked like Vollering would have to abandon with concussion. But, she
soldiered on, and had looked strong and unaffected in recent days.
But today, she simply could not match the pace of her
rivals. Was she simply off the pace, or still feeling the effects of an earlier
crash?
"I haven't spoken to Demi yet, but it seems that
way," team director Lars Boom told Eurosport, acknowledging the crash may
be lingering. “I don't have an explanation, I have to check with her first,”
Boom said, though he praised the team's overall effort.
“We had Evita (Muzic) who was still in a good position in
the standings, up front. That was good for us. It shows we're doing really well
as a team this week. But yeah, Pauline and Gigante looked very strong. That's
just the way it is.”
Read also
Vollering now sits third overall, clinging to a slim
advantage of about twenty seconds over Kasia Niewiadoma. “She's third now,
about twenty seconds ahead of Kasia. That’s good. Trying to
maintain that lead. Tomorrow is another very tough stage. Hopefully, she'll
have better legs then,” Boom added.
While Vollering faltered, Sarah Gigante surged. The
Australian is now second on GC, 2:37 behind Ferrand-Prévot and comfortably
ahead of Vollering. For Gigante and Ferrand-Prevot, this is rapidly turning
into a dream Tour de France Femmes. For Vollering, it’s a case of what could’ve
been, once again.
Read also
Fin MajorCycling Journalist
Fin Major is a UK-based writer at CyclingUpToDate and has been part of the team since 2024. He is the site’s main writer for FAQs and evergreen explainers and has written around 2,000 pieces for the platform. Alongside this work, he focuses on in-depth analysis and covers the biggest races on the calendar, including the Tour de France, the Giro d’Italia, and La Vuelta a España, providing clear context around performance trends, tactics, and key storylines.
In his reporting, Fin uses reputable data sources such as ProCyclingStats for results, statistics, and historical context. He places strong emphasis on careful sourcing, editorial accuracy, and updating articles promptly when new, verified information becomes available. Outside of writing, Fin is an active cyclist, which supports his practical understanding of the sport and its demands.
claps 1visitors 1
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- He should have been allowed to go to Movistar. Right now both arent a good fit for each other and are just wasting each other's time and effortabstractengineer08-11-2026
- Thibau Nys does exactly what Iserbyt is calling for
Rafionain-Glas08-11-2026 - i did not see it. was the relegation justified or an overly hard decision? and don‘t cross riders deviate from straight lines all the time? bumping into each others when they cut corners, etc … why being more strict with the rules on the finish sprint?Ketterechts08-11-2026
- seems like we are advertising the website with pointless comments…Ketterechts08-11-2026
- So?Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- The UCI do have their favorites.
Front24208-11-2026 - On a positive note, you maybe notice turning this topic into a discussion has the benefit of eliminating certain participants who do not see how they can turn it back to their sole interest ;-)Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- People see what they want to. I am actually the opposite of your accusation, probably more of a rebel than most of you who don’t get the big picture. The difference is, I don’t go moaning publicly about the consequences of my transgressions, I understand the need for rules and I take my OWN responsibility when deciding to ignore or break them or doing so involuntarily. I will also not hesitate to state my case or argue vehemently when relevant, sometimes it works, sometimes it makes things worse but that’s the price to pay for principles and having character.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- That may be but that was unknown to others and nothing says that’s the whole truth. Again, don’t try to misinterpret, it is a call and technically it is correct. Besides, even if there is a valid reason, that does not disqualify the ruling or punishment as far as the rules have been developed. I don’t think they’re as far as in football where for handball there is a distinction (in some ways and specific cases) between intentional or not. And football can be just as harsh and people live with it, eg the offside rule, also judged to within tiny fractions but often wrong or ignored. It’s the nature of every collective organisation and sometimes I wonder if our rebellion against it isn’t seated in the feelings we carry from the injustices we’ve felt personally, like being flashed driving 1km/h too fast when we are explained limits are just a security measure but we are absolutely certain not to have endangered anyone with our transgression. The problem is, nobody has better solutions and no 2 people have the same interpretation of where a limit should be.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- Because for you deviated implies the other rider MUST have been made to fall and fail to finish ??? I don’t know if you ride a bike but next time someone carves you up or drives dangerously close, just hold back from those feelings of changing something, reporting or filming or even complaining. Everyone will just say, hey you’re still here undamaged, doesn’t seem like anyone did anything.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
Loading
Write a comment








