"Pauline is next level" – Armstrong and The Move podcast unpacks the 2025 Tour de France Femmes
Cycling
As the dust settles on the 2025
Tour de France Femmes Avec Zwift, The Move podcast team, Lance Armstrong, Mari
Holden, and Alison Tetrick, reflected on a nine-day race that was both
unpredictable and, in the end, utterly dominated by one rider. Pauline
Ferrand-Prévot’s emphatic win, secured by a margin of three minutes and
forty-two seconds over Demi Vollering, became the centrepiece of the
discussion. Ferrand-Prevot became the first French person, man or women, to win
the Tour since 1989, and has confirmed her status as one of the greatest ever
al round cyclists. But the crew also took a deeper look at what the race
revealed about the state of women’s cycling, the emotional arc of rising stars
like Sarah Gigante, and what makes Ferrand-Prévot’s performance so significant.
“She was just so clearly
dominant,” Armstrong said early in the episode, a sentiment that became a
running thread. While the Tour featured numerous attacks and high-speed
descents, Ferrand-Prévot always seemed one move ahead. The American noted that
even in the opening stages, where her presence wasn’t immediately felt, she was
always lurking, always calculating. “She was in control the whole time,” Armstrong
said. “Not just... uphill, downhill, positioning in the peloton.”
The discussion emphasised the
subtlety in Ferrand-Prévot’s approach. “Everyone was talking about Sarah,
talking about Demi... and then she just came out and, you know, she did,” Holden
said. The team never doubted Ferrand-Prévot’s preparation or intention, but her
ability to let the race unfold around her before striking decisively was
praised as a masterclass in racecraft. “Pauline is like literal next level,”
Tetrick said, summing up the feeling that her victory wasn’t just dominant, it
was something beyond.
But the team didn’t shy away from
discussing moments where Ferrand-Prévot showed signs of stress, even on the
last day. “She did say she felt a little pressure in the yellow jersey,”
Tetrick noted. “She got gapped off in the beginning,” she continued,
referencing a moment when two groups formed early on the final stage. Still,
Ferrand-Prévot corrected course quickly: “Wait, what am I doing? I’m going to
get at the front and then I’m going to win in yellow,” she told the media after
the race. Even her brief lapses were met with immediate self-correction.
Read also
While Ferrand-Prévot soared, Sarah
Gigante’s late-stage collapse became one of the more emotional storylines.
Heading into the final stage in second overall, Gigante ended the day in sixth,
losing her podium position due to difficulties descending off the Col de Joux
Plane. “She goes from second in GC... down to sixth... because of descending,”
Armstrong said. “This was brutal.”
Holden, Tetrick, and Armstrong all
made a point to stress how fixable descending issues can be, though they
acknowledged the psychological toll. “It’s learnable,” Armstrong said. “It’s
not about gaining an advantage. It’s about minimizing your losses or eliminating
your losses.” Tetrick, speaking from personal experience, added, “I was
definitely not born with that fearless gene.” All three expressed concern over
the online criticism Gigante faced: “She does not need some troll critiquing
her descending,” Tetrick said.
What made Gigante’s struggle more
painful to watch was how isolated she became on the road. “She was truly in no
woman’s land,” Armstrong said. The physical gap was obvious, but the mental one,
knowing the podium was slipping away without a mechanical, crash, or climb, was
even harder. Armstrong called it “a hard game” that exposes both talent and
vulnerability.

Nobody could come close to Ferrand-Prevot
Beyond individual performances,
the panel praised the evolution of the sport itself. “Four French women in the
top 10. That’s huge,” Armstrong said. Tetrick called it “mind-blowing,”
especially considering how recently French women were absent from the top tier
of the sport. Ferrand-Prévot wasn’t the only French rider making waves, Juliette
Labous drew admiration for her selfless ride in support of the GC battle. “She
was like the bus of that breakaway group,” Tetrick said. “Domestique life,” she
added with a mix of admiration and sympathy.
The group also touched on the
broader implications of the race. “If you didn’t look at gender... this was a
better sporting event [than the men’s],” Armstrong said. From a purely
competitive standpoint, action-packed stages, late GC drama, and a commanding
champion, the women’s race delivered. “We’re in such an exciting place,”
Tetrick noted. “The more we watch women, the more women win.”
Read also
And then there’s the question of
what’s next for Ferrand-Prévot. With her win in the Tour, her known prowess in
mountain biking, and the looming world championships, the door is open for one
of the most decorated and versatile seasons any rider could imagine. “Can you
imagine winning worlds on the road, winning the Tour, and winning the Olympic
gold medal all within 12 months?” Holden wondered. “I think she can imagine
that actually.”
As the episode closed, the panel
reflected on how much the women’s peloton has evolved in just a few years. From
sponsorship growth to deeper fields and sharper race tactics, the shift is
real. And thanks to athletes like Ferrand-Prévot and the continued support of
sponsors like Zwift, the platform is only getting bigger. “It’s not just a
movement anymore,” Tetrick said. “This is just reality.”
Read also
Fin MajorCycling Journalist
Fin Major is a UK-based writer at CyclingUpToDate and has been part of the team since 2024. He is the site’s main writer for FAQs and evergreen explainers and has written around 2,000 pieces for the platform. Alongside this work, he focuses on in-depth analysis and covers the biggest races on the calendar, including the Tour de France, the Giro d’Italia, and La Vuelta a España, providing clear context around performance trends, tactics, and key storylines.
In his reporting, Fin uses reputable data sources such as ProCyclingStats for results, statistics, and historical context. He places strong emphasis on careful sourcing, editorial accuracy, and updating articles promptly when new, verified information becomes available. Outside of writing, Fin is an active cyclist, which supports his practical understanding of the sport and its demands.
claps 0visitors 0
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- He should have been allowed to go to Movistar. Right now both arent a good fit for each other and are just wasting each other's time and effortabstractengineer08-11-2026
- Thibau Nys does exactly what Iserbyt is calling for
Rafionain-Glas08-11-2026 - i did not see it. was the relegation justified or an overly hard decision? and don‘t cross riders deviate from straight lines all the time? bumping into each others when they cut corners, etc … why being more strict with the rules on the finish sprint?Ketterechts08-11-2026
- seems like we are advertising the website with pointless comments…Ketterechts08-11-2026
- So?Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- The UCI do have their favorites.
Front24208-11-2026 - On a positive note, you maybe notice turning this topic into a discussion has the benefit of eliminating certain participants who do not see how they can turn it back to their sole interest ;-)Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- People see what they want to. I am actually the opposite of your accusation, probably more of a rebel than most of you who don’t get the big picture. The difference is, I don’t go moaning publicly about the consequences of my transgressions, I understand the need for rules and I take my OWN responsibility when deciding to ignore or break them or doing so involuntarily. I will also not hesitate to state my case or argue vehemently when relevant, sometimes it works, sometimes it makes things worse but that’s the price to pay for principles and having character.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- That may be but that was unknown to others and nothing says that’s the whole truth. Again, don’t try to misinterpret, it is a call and technically it is correct. Besides, even if there is a valid reason, that does not disqualify the ruling or punishment as far as the rules have been developed. I don’t think they’re as far as in football where for handball there is a distinction (in some ways and specific cases) between intentional or not. And football can be just as harsh and people live with it, eg the offside rule, also judged to within tiny fractions but often wrong or ignored. It’s the nature of every collective organisation and sometimes I wonder if our rebellion against it isn’t seated in the feelings we carry from the injustices we’ve felt personally, like being flashed driving 1km/h too fast when we are explained limits are just a security measure but we are absolutely certain not to have endangered anyone with our transgression. The problem is, nobody has better solutions and no 2 people have the same interpretation of where a limit should be.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- Because for you deviated implies the other rider MUST have been made to fall and fail to finish ??? I don’t know if you ride a bike but next time someone carves you up or drives dangerously close, just hold back from those feelings of changing something, reporting or filming or even complaining. Everyone will just say, hey you’re still here undamaged, doesn’t seem like anyone did anything.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
Loading
1 Comments









