"This might be my biggest smile of the week" – Kopecky glad to end difficult Tour de France Femmes
Cycling
Lotte Kopecky’s 2025 Tour de
France Femmes never really got off the ground. Coming into the race with
general classification ambitions, her plans were derailed by injury before the
start, forcing a shift in focus to stage results. But even there, things didn’t
fall into place, the opening day saw her lose significant time, and her best
finish came on Stage 7 with an 11th place. For a rider who holds two world
titles and multiple Monument victories, it was a disappointing outing.
"I think she's mainly glad
it's over," said Sporza commentator Ine Beyen. "The fact that she's
still attacking on Sunday proves that the team is still having fun. And I think
Lotte is glad she didn't abandon the Tour, because she knows she still needs it
for everything that's yet to come."
Despite the setbacks, Beyen
pointed to some encouraging signs. "Lotte was increasingly showing herself
in the peloton; she proved she was still eager. On Sunday, two teammates, Van
der Breggen and Gerritse, escaped, and then you saw Kopecky's playful side,
eager to continue. That was great to see." But Beyen’s conclusion was
firm: "The final conclusion is simple: she needs to focus on what she's
really good at from now on and not try to tick every box. Some boxes just can't
be ticked."
Kopecky herself seemed ready to
move on, even managing a laugh when speaking to Sporza after the final stage.
"Sorry, this might be my biggest smile of the week," she said.
"It was two very tough days, the kind we rarely encounter in women's
cycling, but I had a pretty good feeling on Sunday. It's just a shame I went
too far up the first climb and ended up in the wrong group. But it was the last
day, so I just kept riding."
Read also
Asked how relieved she was to
finish, she didn’t hold back. "How happy am I that this Tour is over? So
happy," she said with a burst of laughter. But she also found pride in the
team’s collective effort. "No, no, ultimately I'm happy that we were able
to make it a very nice Tour with the team. We collectively got the most out of
it, and we can be proud of that."
Before stepping away, Kopecky gave
a nod to the overall winner, tossing flowers in the direction of Pauline
Ferrand-Prévot. "This is very nice for her. She's someone who can really
work towards a goal, and she proved that once again. Honestly, I didn't expect
it on the final day. I had pushed Gigante forward on the Col de la Madeleine,
but when you ride them two or three minutes behind, you just silence
everyone," she said.
Read also
Fin MajorCycling Journalist
Fin Major is a UK-based writer at CyclingUpToDate and has been part of the team since 2024. He is the site’s main writer for FAQs and evergreen explainers and has written around 2,000 pieces for the platform. Alongside this work, he focuses on in-depth analysis and covers the biggest races on the calendar, including the Tour de France, the Giro d’Italia, and La Vuelta a España, providing clear context around performance trends, tactics, and key storylines.
In his reporting, Fin uses reputable data sources such as ProCyclingStats for results, statistics, and historical context. He places strong emphasis on careful sourcing, editorial accuracy, and updating articles promptly when new, verified information becomes available. Outside of writing, Fin is an active cyclist, which supports his practical understanding of the sport and its demands.
claps 0visitors 0
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- He should have been allowed to go to Movistar. Right now both arent a good fit for each other and are just wasting each other's time and effortabstractengineer08-11-2026
- Thibau Nys does exactly what Iserbyt is calling for
Rafionain-Glas08-11-2026 - i did not see it. was the relegation justified or an overly hard decision? and don‘t cross riders deviate from straight lines all the time? bumping into each others when they cut corners, etc … why being more strict with the rules on the finish sprint?Ketterechts08-11-2026
- seems like we are advertising the website with pointless comments…Ketterechts08-11-2026
- So?Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- The UCI do have their favorites.
Front24208-11-2026 - On a positive note, you maybe notice turning this topic into a discussion has the benefit of eliminating certain participants who do not see how they can turn it back to their sole interest ;-)Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- People see what they want to. I am actually the opposite of your accusation, probably more of a rebel than most of you who don’t get the big picture. The difference is, I don’t go moaning publicly about the consequences of my transgressions, I understand the need for rules and I take my OWN responsibility when deciding to ignore or break them or doing so involuntarily. I will also not hesitate to state my case or argue vehemently when relevant, sometimes it works, sometimes it makes things worse but that’s the price to pay for principles and having character.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- That may be but that was unknown to others and nothing says that’s the whole truth. Again, don’t try to misinterpret, it is a call and technically it is correct. Besides, even if there is a valid reason, that does not disqualify the ruling or punishment as far as the rules have been developed. I don’t think they’re as far as in football where for handball there is a distinction (in some ways and specific cases) between intentional or not. And football can be just as harsh and people live with it, eg the offside rule, also judged to within tiny fractions but often wrong or ignored. It’s the nature of every collective organisation and sometimes I wonder if our rebellion against it isn’t seated in the feelings we carry from the injustices we’ve felt personally, like being flashed driving 1km/h too fast when we are explained limits are just a security measure but we are absolutely certain not to have endangered anyone with our transgression. The problem is, nobody has better solutions and no 2 people have the same interpretation of where a limit should be.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- Because for you deviated implies the other rider MUST have been made to fall and fail to finish ??? I don’t know if you ride a bike but next time someone carves you up or drives dangerously close, just hold back from those feelings of changing something, reporting or filming or even complaining. Everyone will just say, hey you’re still here undamaged, doesn’t seem like anyone did anything.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
Loading
Write a comment








