Lance Armstrong backs respect shown for Tadej Pogacar after Tour de France crash: "They wouldn’t want that guy riding angry"
Cycling
Lance Armstrong has shared his take on Tadej Pogacar’s crash during Stage 11 of the 2025 Tour de France, offering analysis on his podcast The Move alongside former pros George Hincapie and Bradley Wiggins. The trio were united in their view: the peloton made the right call by waiting for the race leader — but the consequences of the crash could still be felt in today’s first summit finish at Hautacam.
The incident occurred when Pogacar, wearing the rainbow jersey, went down in a crash involving Uno-X’s Tobias Johannessen. Armstrong highlighted the irony of the moment: “Pogacar collided with a rider from Uno-X — a team that’s had both a brilliant and brutal day. They almost managed to take out the Tour’s top favourite. He had trouble getting the chain back on, needed help from neutral service. He was struggling. And in that moment, the peloton had a decision to make: keep riding and gain 20 seconds at the line, or sit up and wait. And they waited.”
All three agreed that waiting was the only viable option — not just tactically, but ethically. Hincapie suggested that any attempt to capitalise on the crash would have been seen as unsporting: “If they’d tried to take advantage, it would’ve looked really bad. I’m glad they waited — they’d have waited for you, and you’d have done the same. Besides, what could they have done? EF weren’t going to drill it on the front. Visma only had Matteo Jorgenson — a top-five contender — and Simon Yates, the Giro winner. They’d have ended up looking terrible.”
Read also
Wiggins was on the same page, pointing out the minimal gains on offer for a move that could have drawn heavy criticism: “They weren’t chasing the stage win or anything like that. What would they have taken — 20 seconds at best? I think they made the right call. It was the respectful thing to do. And we know what Tadej would’ve done if Jonas Vingegaard had gone down — he’d have done exactly the same.”
Armstrong took the point further, arguing that exploiting the crash would have handed Pogacar powerful motivation on the eve of a decisive mountain test: “If they’d taken those 20 seconds, they’d have known exactly what Tadej would be thinking tonight — just before the first major summit finish. I’ll just say this: they wouldn’t want that guy riding angry.”

As the conversation turned to the impact of the crash, Hincapie offered a sobering assessment. While Pogacar remounted quickly and downplayed the incident at the finish, the physical toll may still linger: “He hit the tarmac hard — landed on his hip and shoulder. Sure, he got up fast, but that’s adrenaline. At the line he said he was fine, but we’ve seen it before — you often don’t feel the real damage until the next day, especially when you’re heading into the high mountains.”
With the Tour’s first serious climbing stage looming, all eyes will be on the yellow jersey. The peloton may have shown sportsmanship in the heat of the moment — but whether Pogacar emerges unscathed physically remains to be seen.
Read also

Kieran WoodDeputy Editor-in-Chief
Kieran Wood is a sports journalist based in Wales and has been active in journalism since 2022. He regularly contributes to DartsNews.com and CyclingUpToDate.com, where he covers professional cycling and darts. In cycling, his work includes liveblogs from major races, including the Tour de France, the Giro d’Italia, and La Vuelta a España, alongside race reports and analysis. He has also conducted interviews with professional riders.
His reporting spans the full racing calendar, from one-day classics to stage races, with a focus on accurate, real-time coverage and clear contextual analysis. For statistics, results, and historical context, he regularly uses resources such as ProCyclingStats. To support reporting on rider activity and training context where relevant, he also references Strava.
In his work, Kieran places strong emphasis on careful sourcing, editorial accuracy, and updating articles as new, verified information becomes available.
claps 2visitors 2
Top comment
mij17-07-20257
what proof do you have of that
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- Just looked again at the photo. Yeah I stand by that. If MS had fallen over in Brands direction I don’t even think she would have hit her. You must be a UCI race commissioner. I’ll be sure to check my sock height should I ever see you on a ride. Looks like everyone else on here sees what I see.mij08-11-2026
- I said looking at the photo it doesn’t appear she deviated. Chill out, not stating my word is the final judgement. Just commenting that based on the photo I don’t see it. And BTW the Dutch coach even said she didn’t impede her.mij08-11-2026
- Blah Blah Blah !frieders308-11-2026
- MS said she was changing gears so that caused her slight deviation. Nothing was intentional.frieders308-11-2026
- How can you use a photo post incident to judge the incident itself (which is not hard to find if you’re prepared to invest the same amount of time in searching as writing that comment? It’s harsh but technically right even though this or worse is not always sanctioned in every race. The two things that went against MS (who unfortunately for her would still have won without making her mistake) are that it was not a bunch sprint where there could have been an overlooked incident or mitigating circumstances explaining a deviation. Everything was focused on just those 2, Schreiber was riding beautifully balanced which made her sudden deviation look unnatural stroke as if it could have been in some part intentional whilst she was slowly drifting ever closer towards the barrier to a point that would have reached obstruction level. In her defence, it might have been the realisation she was heading towards that that made her react suddenly and caused the deviation involuntarily. In any case, congratulations to her for the ride of her life, in people’s minds she will be credited for it.Jumpyjohn07-11-2026
- Good boy Obviously doesn’t need that much help dealing with pressure, as some have suggested. Wiser (and humbler) than many far further along their careers. About offering him the moon, recently someone came up with an explanation of the downfall of a football great (either referring to Maradona or Portuguese Ronaldo) saying it was kind of normal after coming back from the moon, except that others, including some who actually did go to the moon like Armstrong (Neil in case anyone is too switched off to realise) didn’t go through any of the same motions after coming back. A lot of how you deal with situations has less to do with the situation than with your character.Jumpyjohn07-11-2026
- I think that they're not really used to dealing with this type of incident in a cyclocross race, and the situation has been magnified because it was a race for a championship title. It's very unfortunate that the race had to be decided in this way.
santiagobenites07-11-2026 - Seriously why do they keep doing stupid things like this. Its one thing to relegate when the placings are minor, when the action is blatant. But when it is ambiguous, why dont they at least take advice from some higher up to avoid embarrassing themselves. This is similar to the Halland goal when his teammate was clearly offside and interfered in play and VAR gave them the goal. if you dont have evidence you cannot convict. Even for doping they have these rulesabstractengineer07-11-2026
- So all those who went to watch, including all from abroad, waled there, spent nothing? Most places hosting events of the sort manage to make it worthwhile. If it was so obviously fruitless, don’t you think by now they’d have run out of hosting candidates? Why do you think the Tour can command such high prices for departure and arrival locations? If it didn’t bring anything locally they’d have to pay to get authorisation to use cities.Jumpyjohn07-11-2026
- What a travesty ! That little deviation did nothing to impede Brand !frieders307-11-2026
Loading
3 Comments







