Jonathan Milan wins chaotic reduced bunch sprint on stage 3 of the Volta a la Comunitat Valenciana
Cycling
Having been starved of opportunities to compete for the victory in the opening two stages, it was set to be a day for the sprinters on stage 3. After a crash-marred finale, in which a fall in the bunch caused a late split, it was Lidl - Trek who delivered their sprinter Jonathan Milan perfectly, as he took his first win of the season for his new team.
At the start of the day, the breakaway formed after just 5km of racing, as Guillermo Thomas Silva (Caja Rural - Seguros RGA), Asier Etxeberria (Euskaltel - Euskadi), Laurent Gervais (Project Echelon Racing), Unai Esparza (Illes Balears Arabay Cycling), Nathan Smith (Team Novo Nordisk) and Ander Okamika (Burgos - BH) went away, with their gap going close to seven minutes at one point.
Read also
Guillermo Thomas Silva would take the maximum points and the bonus seconds at both the intermediate sprint in Albatera and the only categorised climb of the day, which was the Cat-3 climb of the Puerto de Albatera.
With around 50km to go, the gap to the breakaway stood at about two minutes, with Amanuel Ghebreigzabhier setting the pace on the front of the peloton for Lidl - Trek, in the hopes of setting up a bunch sprint for Milan.
With the finish getting closer and closer, more teams started to commit riders to the chase, with the gap to the breakaway dropping to under one minute with around 20km to go.
As the race hit some undulating terrain, the front group began to splinter with Esparza dropping and Smith beginning to lose the wheel, but just about managing to hang on as the gap to the peloton went to thirty seconds.
Read also
With 8km to go, the breakaway lost another rider, as Laurent Gervais went too quickly into a corner and had to bunny hop a curb in order to avoid a parked car on the course before losing control of his bike and being forced to dismount.
In spite of this, the front group continued to press on as their gap to the peloton had stabilised going into the final 5km of the race and they began to believe that they could hold off the chasing bunch.
Their efforts would ultimately be in vain though, as they were caught with just over a kilometre to go, but a crash in the peloton had caused a split, with a small group of riders led by Intermarché - Wanty and Lidl - Trek going off the front.
In the end, nobody could challenge Milan, as he was delivered perfectly into the final few hundred metres, winning comfortably ahead of the remaining sprinters as nobody was able to come around him.
Read also
Results powered by FirstCycling.com
claps 0visitors 0
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- He should have been allowed to go to Movistar. Right now both arent a good fit for each other and are just wasting each other's time and effortabstractengineer08-11-2026
- Thibau Nys does exactly what Iserbyt is calling for
Rafionain-Glas08-11-2026 - i did not see it. was the relegation justified or an overly hard decision? and don‘t cross riders deviate from straight lines all the time? bumping into each others when they cut corners, etc … why being more strict with the rules on the finish sprint?Ketterechts08-11-2026
- seems like we are advertising the website with pointless comments…Ketterechts08-11-2026
- So?Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- The UCI do have their favorites.
Front24208-11-2026 - On a positive note, you maybe notice turning this topic into a discussion has the benefit of eliminating certain participants who do not see how they can turn it back to their sole interest ;-)Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- People see what they want to. I am actually the opposite of your accusation, probably more of a rebel than most of you who don’t get the big picture. The difference is, I don’t go moaning publicly about the consequences of my transgressions, I understand the need for rules and I take my OWN responsibility when deciding to ignore or break them or doing so involuntarily. I will also not hesitate to state my case or argue vehemently when relevant, sometimes it works, sometimes it makes things worse but that’s the price to pay for principles and having character.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- That may be but that was unknown to others and nothing says that’s the whole truth. Again, don’t try to misinterpret, it is a call and technically it is correct. Besides, even if there is a valid reason, that does not disqualify the ruling or punishment as far as the rules have been developed. I don’t think they’re as far as in football where for handball there is a distinction (in some ways and specific cases) between intentional or not. And football can be just as harsh and people live with it, eg the offside rule, also judged to within tiny fractions but often wrong or ignored. It’s the nature of every collective organisation and sometimes I wonder if our rebellion against it isn’t seated in the feelings we carry from the injustices we’ve felt personally, like being flashed driving 1km/h too fast when we are explained limits are just a security measure but we are absolutely certain not to have endangered anyone with our transgression. The problem is, nobody has better solutions and no 2 people have the same interpretation of where a limit should be.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- Because for you deviated implies the other rider MUST have been made to fall and fail to finish ??? I don’t know if you ride a bike but next time someone carves you up or drives dangerously close, just hold back from those feelings of changing something, reporting or filming or even complaining. Everyone will just say, hey you’re still here undamaged, doesn’t seem like anyone did anything.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
Loading
Write a comment










