That combination has prompted some pointed analysis in the latest edition of
Eurosport’s Kop over Kop podcast, where concerns were raised not only about Yates’ exit, but about whether Visma have done enough to stand still while others move forward.
Yates exit leaves a late-season problem
When the podcast panel ran through the list of departures, the scale of the change was hard to ignore. Alongside Yates, riders such as
Dylan van Baarle,
Attila Valter,
Cian Uijtdebroeks and
Olav Kooij are no longer part of the project.
“It’s still a strong team, but they haven’t become stronger,” said Jeroen Vanbelleghem on Kop over Kop, pointing directly to the timing of Yates’ decision. “How are you going to replace
Simon Yates this late? It’s already January.”
That lateness is key. Visma had already shaped their 2026 Grand Tour plans around
Jonas Vingegaard, with Yates no longer positioned as a co-leader but still expected to be a central pillar. His retirement removed that safety net without offering the team any real time to react externally.
Vanbelleghem does believe Visma will look inward for solutions, adding: “It could be that
Ben Tulett gets a bigger role.” But that, too, underlines the risk. Promotion from within is a necessity, not a luxury.
Burnout signs hard to ignore
The circumstances of Yates’ exit also drew scrutiny.
Bobbie Traksel did not shy away from suggesting a deeper issue, calling the situation “very painful” and adding: “He’s completely done. He’s even blocked all cycling-related accounts on social media. That fits with burnout, in my view.”
What puzzled the panel further was how abruptly that end appeared to arrive. Vanbelleghem questioned why Yates had still appeared publicly in Visma colours and attended Giro-related events, while Jan Hermsen noted that Yates himself had expressed a desire to defend his title, even if the team had not yet confirmed it.
“That’s probably because
Jonas Vingegaard is going,” Vanbelleghem speculated, before asking whether that really had to be a problem. Hermsen’s response was blunt: “That doesn’t have to clash with each other.”
Taken together, the comments paint a picture not of a planned transition, but of a late rupture that leaves Visma exposed in areas where stability has long been one of their strengths.
Pressure building from every side
Beyond Grand Tours, the podcast panel also looked at Visma’s broader position in the WorldTour hierarchy. Vanbelleghem warned that their second place on the UCI ranking behind UAE is no longer secure.
“They’re going to face serious competition,” he said. “Lidl–Trek are going to hurt them, especially now they’ve added Juan Ayuso as a real points scorer. And Visma no longer have Kooij.”
Matthew Brennan was mentioned as a possible partial solution, but even that was framed as compensation rather than progression. Traksel added that Red Bull, bolstered by Remco Evenepoel, are also closing fast.
The consensus was clear. Visma are not collapsing, but the margins that once separated them from the chasing pack are thinning.
Still strong, but no longer untouchable
None of the Kop over Kop contributors suggested Visma are about to fall away. The team still revolves around one of the most reliable Grand Tour leaders in the sport, and their internal structure remains among the best in cycling.
But the tone of the discussion marked a shift. For the first time in years, Visma are being analysed less as the benchmark and more as a team under pressure to defend its place.
As the experts made clear, 2026 may not be defined by whether Visma can catch UAE, but by whether they can hold off a rapidly closing pack behind them.