“Most of the women are making less than $10k a year... Nobody cares” - Trek boss slams cycling's gender prize money gap after paying over $300k to bridge divide

Trek has paid more than $300,000 in recent years to bridge prize money gaps for its women’s riders, stepping in at races where payouts remain significantly lower than in the men’s peloton.

Between 2021 and 2025, the American manufacturer contributed approximately $308,000 in top ups for its Lidl-Trek team, covering the difference at events where the financial rewards on offer did not match those available in equivalent men’s races.

Those disparities remain clearly visible in 2026. At Liège-Bastogne-Liège Femmes, the total prize fund stood at just over €22,000, compared to €50,000 for the men’s race held on the same day.

At an individual level, the difference is just as pronounced. A sixth-place finish in the women’s race returned roughly €400 in official prize money, compared to around €1,500 for the equivalent placing in the men’s event. In that scenario, Trek would step in to cover the shortfall, adding approximately €1,100.

Set against the wider Spring Classics picture, those figures underline the scale of the gap. On the men’s side, leading riders have accumulated five-figure totals across the same block of races, with Tadej Pogacar approaching €100,000 in prize money alone across the spring, and both Mathieu van der Poel and Wout van Aert also building substantial totals.

Speaking to Fortune, Trek CEO John Burke outlined the thinking behind the initiative. “One of the things we do with the bike company is we try and make a difference in the world,” he said.

He also recalled the conditions he encountered when the team was first being developed, following a visit to European races. “He said, ‘I was just over there in Europe, and it’s embarrassing. Most of the women are making less than $10,000 a year. They get secondhand bikes. They stay at shitty hotels. They’re flown in the night before the race. Nobody cares.’”

From the outset, Trek aimed to provide riders with comparable support to their male counterparts. “We said we’re going to treat women the same way the men are treated,” Burke said. “We’re going to pay them liveable wages, we’re going to give them the best equipment, we’re going to give them great coaching. We’re going to take really good care of them the same way we take care of men.”

Lizzie Deignan, who joined the team while pregnant despite being ranked number one in the world at the time, highlighted the impact of that approach. “To be a professional athlete in every sense of the word is transformative in terms of performance,” she said. “There’s no way that anybody managing all those extra things that come with a second job has the capacity to perform at the same level as someone who’s full-time.”

She added: “I felt incredibly grateful to Trek for the opportunity to join the team, because when I announced that I was pregnant, I didn’t know what my future looked like in the sport. Despite being ranked number one in the world at the time, I didn’t have a secure team.”

Despite the progress made in recent years, the financial gap across comparable races remains evident. Prize funds continue to differ significantly between men’s and women’s events, leaving teams and sponsors to play a role in bridging that divide.

“The biggest thing that we do is be an example,” Burke said. “The impact that Trek’s made on women’s cycling isn’t just the Trek team. It’s all of the teams who saw what Trek was doing, and they made big changes.”

“Too many people are focused on the short term and on what they get,” he added. “Doing good things builds a brand over a long period of time.”

The figures from the Spring Classics underline that progress has been made, but also that the gap Trek set out to address has not yet been closed.