
There’s no sugar-coating it: Wout van Aert is enduring a
difficult start to the 2025 season. The Team Visma | Lease a Bike talisman has
yet to produce a signature ride this spring, and his subdued performance at the
E3 Saxo Classic, where rival Mathieu van der Poel put on a masterclass, has
sparked a wave of criticism in the Belgian media.
For a rider who has carried the expectations of a
cycling-obsessed nation for years, scrutiny is nothing new. But the intensity
of the reaction this time has prompted his teammates to speak out, with Matteo
Jorgenson offering an emphatic defence ahead of Wednesday’s Dwars door
Vlaanderen.
Read also
Jorgenson: “These people are human”
Jorgenson, winner of Paris–Nice in back-to-back seasons and
defending champion at Dwars door Vlaanderen, has been training and racing
alongside van Aert and is under no illusions about the pressure his teammate
faces.
"I see a lot on social media from any Belgian rider
that does anything, and just look at Wout's palmarès, he's one of the best
riders of all time," Jorgenson told VRT. "Then to have a few bad
races and to see comments, I sometimes think the public here has so much
passion and they want to see Belgians on top, and I understand that, but I
think some understanding should be had in any case because these people are
human."
The American went on to share a detailed picture of van
Aert’s recent training efforts on Mount Teide, reinforcing the point that
commitment, not complacency, lies behind the current form.
Read also
"I've been on [Mount Teide] in Tenerife, I know what
the process is like. He went there for three weeks, away from his two kids and
wife, to train. The whole time, he woke up in the morning, weighed his food,
went out and trained, came home, and weighed his lunch. I mean he lives for
cycling, and he's doing his best, and in the end, there's not much more you can
do."
The perspective offered by Jorgenson is an important one. In
a sport where results are everything and the calendar is relentless, even the
most dedicated professionals can be reduced to numbers. But as he reminded the
public, van Aert’s work ethic is not in question.
"I think that what I know about Wout is that he's an
incredibly hard worker and incredibly focused, and I have confidence that he'll
be ready for Flanders because he's spent three weeks preparing just like he's
done every single year, and he's in great shape."
Read also
Team Visma | Lease a Bike head of racing Grischa Niermann
also weighed in, calling for patience and perspective. With the Tour of
Flanders and Paris-Roubaix looming, the Dutch team is well aware of the stakes,
but they’re also trying to protect their riders from burning out under
pressure.
"Wout is really hungry," Niermann told Cyclingnews.
"On the other hand, it's also about staying calm and confident, and there
are very important races coming up, but we also try to keep it simple and
remember it's just racing. When we want it too much, then it's also not going
in the right direction."
That sentiment captures a familiar tension in elite cycling:
the desire to win colliding with the need to remain process-driven. For van
Aert (labelled as the sport’s ultimate all-rounder but still missing that
elusive Monument win in Flanders or Roubaix) the pressure to finally deliver
this spring is immense.
Read also
Returning to the scene of the crash
Wednesday’s Dwars door Vlaanderen offers a crucial moment to
reset. It was at this very race last year that van Aert’s Classics campaign was
derailed by a brutal crash, an incident that also took out a huge chunk of the
peloton, and led to changes in this year’s course.
"It's a different race I think without Kanarieberg
[climb]," said Jorgenson, referring to the removed climb and descent that
played a role in the 2024 crash.
Read also
The course change could suit van Aert, offering a slightly
less chaotic environment to rediscover rhythm and confidence. For both rider
and team, it’s an opportunity to rebuild morale ahead of Sunday’s Tour of
Flanders, arguably the biggest day of van Aert’s season.
"I really would also love to see Wout [van Aert] get a
result and get some confidence before Sunday, and I hope both of us can be in
the final together," Jorgenson added.
Read also
Fin MajorCycling Journalist
Fin Major is a UK-based writer at CyclingUpToDate and has been part of the team since 2024. He is the site’s main writer for FAQs and evergreen explainers and has written around 2,000 pieces for the platform. Alongside this work, he focuses on in-depth analysis and covers the biggest races on the calendar, including the Tour de France, the Giro d’Italia, and La Vuelta a España, providing clear context around performance trends, tactics, and key storylines.
In his reporting, Fin uses reputable data sources such as ProCyclingStats for results, statistics, and historical context. He places strong emphasis on careful sourcing, editorial accuracy, and updating articles promptly when new, verified information becomes available. Outside of writing, Fin is an active cyclist, which supports his practical understanding of the sport and its demands.
claps 2visitors 2
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- He is boring
leedorney08-11-2026 - To Twoje przemyślenia te bla, bla :)
Dariusz08-11-2026 - Uwielbiam patrzeć, jak wyjeżdża na czoło peletonu i zaczyna się rzeź...
Dariusz08-11-2026 - Yeah, unreal.
parisbound0008-11-2026 - there needs to be space in life for pointless comments!Ketterechts08-11-2026
- That is a very lazy way of putting it but so far on this website it seems like everyone is happy to look at everything lazily, even things that annoy them intensely. All they want to do is state their feeling and position but ask most to analyse a problem or come up with solutions or improvements and you’re stunned by silence. Nobody even really knows how this all happens. It’s very simple and quick to just say the UCI did it but I bet you they didn’t, I bet you not more than 2 people were involved, more likely just 1. The UCI may be ultimately responsible but it is not their decision, this is about hierarchy, power and delegation. The fact that protest is possible also means it isn’t over and that MORE people could get involved for a thorough review which could throw up anything. It is highly likely it was a sole commissar who decided and has that power in a first round. Therein might lie the problem the UCI has to consider, is it acceptable to give so much authority to one single person when it is quite possible for them to have a natural bias or be too easily susceptible to imposed bias. Who is to say an individual in this position isn’t susceptible to collaboration with outside players with interests in the results, nations, families, teams, betting companies, etc. On the one hand we have sports where these problems have been worked on way more to reduce such problems, on the other hand we have sports with far stricter and more draconian rules not even concerning safety or obstruction that nobody really questions like false starts or stepping out of lane or zones in athletics. If cycling hastowork on itself, it would be good if protagonists (all kinds) would start doing a little more than just moaning over outcomes.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- Yes, so why not make comments less pointless?Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- What a race! I didn't expect Vanthourenhout to collapse like that, and Wyseure did take the fight to Nys, but there was no doubt at the end. I also wonder what Aubin Sparfel would be capable of were he to race in the elites now. In the U23 ranks he is making good work of Giel Lejeune, who himself is among the better riders in the elites, and a top 10 contender in the big races (3rd at Kleebergcross, 8th at Berencross and 5th at Heerderstrand). In the French Cup, Sparfel is significantly better than Romain Debord (8th at Koppenbergcross and 10th at the Euros) and Rémi Lelandais (12th at Koppenbergcross and 19th at the Euros).
Rafionain-Glas08-11-2026 - There really was nothing in it. Schreiber was so much faster, and Brand was fighting to stay in the wheel in the sprint. Schreiber did move a bit, but to say she closed the door doesn't make sense because Brand couldn't enter it anyway, abd she wasn't impeded.
Rafionain-Glas08-11-2026 - He should have been allowed to go to Movistar. Right now both arent a good fit for each other and are just wasting each other's time and effortabstractengineer08-11-2026
Loading
Write a comment












