“It’s something he’s asked for, but do the Giro and the Tour… then we’ll see” – Quick-Step DS addresses rumours of Mikel Landa’s Grand Tour hat-trick in 2026
Cycling
The idea of Mikel Landa riding all three of cycling's Grand Tours in a single season has always felt more like romantic speculation than a realistic plan. Yet heading into 2026, the conversation has shifted from fantasy to conditional possibility.
Not because of public ambition, but because the request has come from Landa himself, and because Soudal - Quick-Step are entering a very different phase of their history.
“It’s something he’s asked for, but do the Giro and the Tour… then we’ll see,” sports director Davide Bramati said in conversation with Bici.Pro, laying out the clearest framework yet for how far the team are prepared to go.
That line does a lot of work. It confirms intent, sets boundaries, and makes clear that any talk of a Grand Tour hat-trick will be earned rather than granted.
A rider who has done everything but all three
For all of Landa’s longevity at the top level, one box remains unticked. He has never ridden the Giro d’Italia, Tour de France and Vuelta a Espana in the same year.
Across his career he has started more than 20 Grand Tours, with repeated appearances at all three and podium finishes at the Giro. He has proven capable of backing up strong form across long blocks of racing, but always with limits applied. Even in his peak seasons, programmes were built around two Grand Tours at most.
That is what gives weight to the 2026 discussion. This would not be a symbolic farewell tour or a vanity project. It would be something entirely new for a rider now in the latter phase of his career. “I continue to enjoy what I do and I have the same passion as on my first day with the team,” Landa said. “Now I’m about to start my sixteenth year as a professional, something I would never have imagined when I turned pro.”
That perspective matters. This is not a rider chasing nostalgia, but one who believes there is still space to compete meaningfully across the biggest races on the calendar.
Giro first, and unfinished business
If there is one Grand Tour that still defines Landa’s career, it is the Giro d’Italia. Twice on the podium, often among the strongest climbers in the race, but repeatedly undone by crashes or misfortune.
Last season followed that pattern brutally, when a crash on the opening day ended his race almost before it had begun. “Before the Giro everything was going perfectly, I was in excellent shape and felt very good,” Landa recalled. “I was ready to fight for a good general classification. Then that accident happened and everything went up in smoke.”
Bramati has not forgotten that context. “Mikel will be at the Giro and he will be our leader,” he said. “Stages or general classification? Why not try to ride for the general classification. Let’s remember that he has an unfinished story with the Giro, and it is also a very nice Giro.”
That choice of words is revealing. This is not framed as a transitional role or a reduced ambition. The Giro remains the foundation of any wider plan.
Why the Tour matters before the Vuelta
The Tour de France sits at the centre of Bramati’s conditional approach. Historically, it has been the race where Landa has either consolidated his form or reached his limit. Strong performances there would make any discussion about a third Grand Tour credible. Weak ones would likely close the door.
That is why the Vuelta, despite being Landa’s home Grand Tour, is treated as optional rather than guaranteed. Bramati’s “then we’ll see” is not evasive. It is structural.
Modern cycling does not reward sentiment. “You have to deal with modern cycling, which is very demanding,” Bramati said. “For now he will do the Giro and then the Tour, and then we’ll see.”
The implication is clear. Two Grand Tours at a high level open the conversation. Anything less ends it.
Bramati has been a key figure at Quick-Step for nearly two decades
A different role in a changing team
There is also a broader context at play. With Remco Evenepoel no longer part of the team, Quick-Step’s Grand Tour strategy has reset. Landa is no longer supporting a single dominant leader. He is now the reference point.
That responsibility has sharpened his standing inside the group. Bramati describes him as “a real example for the young riders”, highlighting his professionalism and impact beyond results.
For a team rebuilding its identity, that matters. A potential Grand Tour hat-trick would not just be about Landa. It would be about demonstrating that experience, resilience and ambition still have a place in Quick-Step’s future.
Whether the idea ever reaches the start line of the Vuelta remains uncertain. That uncertainty is the point. In 2026, nothing is automatic. For Landa, the door is open. But only if he earns the right to walk through it.
Kieran WoodDeputy Editor-in-Chief
Kieran Wood is a sports journalist based in Wales and has been active in journalism since 2022. He regularly contributes to DartsNews.com and CyclingUpToDate.com, where he covers professional cycling and darts. In cycling, his work includes liveblogs from major races, including the Tour de France, the Giro d’Italia, and La Vuelta a España, alongside race reports and analysis. He has also conducted interviews with professional riders.
His reporting spans the full racing calendar, from one-day classics to stage races, with a focus on accurate, real-time coverage and clear contextual analysis. For statistics, results, and historical context, he regularly uses resources such as ProCyclingStats. To support reporting on rider activity and training context where relevant, he also references Strava.
In his work, Kieran places strong emphasis on careful sourcing, editorial accuracy, and updating articles as new, verified information becomes available.
claps 0visitors 0
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- It’s off-season mate, I’m bored and fed up with the mediocrity of people unwilling to provoke change when they admit things aren’t right. What have you done lately to make anyone realise you won’t put up with things? What conversation, are you dictating to me which part of the incident I have to be interested in or telling me other parts are taboo? That’s what I guess the UCI would really like, let them moan, let it blow over for them pass on to the next thing, let’s keep the status quo, let’s try our best not reviewing or revealing anything about decision-making just like every time before, they’re used to it by now so we can take the risk they’ll never give us grief.Jumpyjohn09-11-2026
- As far as CUTD headlines go this is far from the worst. It helps if you look at it twice and realise it’s a list of descriptions from distinct events. You can’t deny the reality of being a rival if you consider the picture immediately below, frontrunner is unfortunate but I’m guessing this time it’s more a linguistic failure than a clickbaiting opportunity. Just a reminder that this is not an anglo website, for those who find it too tedious to interpret text to get the gist of things which are rarely of great importance (as opposed to eg purposely biaised DOJ extradition translations in order to achieve hidden agendas), there are plenty of anglo cycling websites google can suggest.Jumpyjohn09-11-2026
- Ah, finally someone willing to be a bit proactive.Jumpyjohn09-11-2026
- So? Do you understand the way instructions, decisions and authority work? Do you think in a football match if after a match (or even after play has gone on) a player tells the referee he did touch the ball with his hands when the referee didn’t award opponents a penalty that they will revise the score or force a replay? You really don’t get my point, it’s not against the rider but everyone here is so emotional for her they can’t get back to an issue which needs resolving for the future and the first step (or maybe second) is to try to understand how and why it happens, none of you have contributed in the least to that. All everyone is interested in is letting everyone know they agree how unjust it was, not even sure anyone thinks that could affect anything.Jumpyjohn09-11-2026
- Shouldn’t you be in MOUrning?Jumpyjohn09-11-2026
- Maybe you don’t like it and that’s fine, we all have different sensibilities and topics that touch us, but as you try to show me, it doesn’t hurt to reflect and compare ourselves to others behaving similarly. What precisely is the difference between a sports fan interested in every detail of his/her hero’s life and a celeb fan having the same hobby? It’s far more interesting to learn and think about how and why (which) people do things than reading about what they are actually doing. And just to add another level, maybe you’ll agree we don’t use the same value system for everyone, we discriminate in an enormous number of systematic ways. For example, when is the last time you saw a discussion arguing about the achievements of two politicians to compare or for that matter two business leaders apart from the comparison of hypothetical wealth accumulated? Perhaps you misunderstood the intention?Jumpyjohn09-11-2026
- I don’t think I know what’s beneath the surface but I am willing to think about it, discuss it, compare it to a known past, extrapolate to a potential future and ask/try to find out truth or even take action within my powers (boycotting something or someone is within EVERY person’s reach). If you think your attitude has more chance of changing a result, a process, a system or an institution or it just makes you feel good, keep at it but to me it looks like you’ve already given up before trying.Jumpyjohn09-11-2026
- All journalists should start asking the UCI uncomfortable questions, sending inquiries about the interpretation of the rules and the justification of the results. This is the only way to change anything.averagecyclist09-11-2026
- OFF TOPIC: OK, don't get mad with me... I have some very important news, something that can't be overlooked, something that can't be ignored!!! In the new documentary Anatomy of a G.O.A.T. (released in November 2026), legendary Belgian cyclist EDDY MERCKX spoke about TADEJ POGAČAR: Merckx: “He has revived a style of cycling that we had almost forgotten. He is now better than me.” Key statements by Merckx about Pogačar in 2026: - Acknowledging his superiority: This time, Merckx openly admitted, without any subsequent backtracking or reservations, that Pogačar had surpassed him and was now above him. This contrasts with 2024, when he quickly softened his remarks about Pogačar being faster. - The possibility of a historic triple (Giro, Tour and Vuelta): During the July Tour de France (where Pogi claimed his fifth title), Merckx stated that Pogi was the only cyclist in history capable of winning all three Grand Tours (the Giro d'Italia, Tour de France and Vuelta a España) in a single season, provided the conditions were right and he had sufficient team support. - Lack of serious competition: Merckx emphasised that Pogačar has no real rivals in the mountains since 2024, thanks to his extraordinary climbing ability and the fact that he continues to improve despite still being under 28 (he turned 28 in autumn 2026). - Praise for his racing style: Merckx highlighted how Pogačar is bringing back the aggressive, uncompromising spirit of cycling's golden era, when races were not merely about calculated stages and tactical conservatism, but about attacking from long distances. PS: Now, this is real important cycling news. This is not "boring" ... this is called making real history, not BS history. Capish?PogiSloFans09-11-2026
- how else is there to look at things? we are responding to words and pictures, we are not there. your long winded replies make zero sense to anyone. pretty much everyone but you says the same thing. MS was robbed. somehow you think you're so smart to dig beneath the surface and discover something no one else, including the opposing coach and cyclist, saw. lol. you are a tool.mij09-11-2026
Loading
1 Comments