"I am not going to take risks for the minimum wage anymore" - Ben Hermans risks retirement after not being renewed by Cofidis
Cycling
Ben Hermans was one of Cofidis' signings into 2024, and was an attempt to get a strong and experienced climber helping it's efforts to score enough UCI points to stay afloat in the World Tour. The Belgian did not get to renew with the French team and his career may come to an end soon, as he is also aware of the risks in the sport and that at this point in his career it's not worth continuing if he doesn't receive something appropriate for his level.
“I knew from September that I would not get a new contract with Cofidis. But honestly? I had felt that coming," Hermans told Wielerflits. "I knew that I had to look for another team, and that this search would not be easy because of my age and demands. I also told my manager what my feeling was, and what I would still like to do. Once you start making demands, there are many young riders who want to sign for a lower salary in your place.” The 38-year old is aware of the challenges, and the desire for teams to sign young riders that can develop into new leaders.
Read also
But Hermans found himself to be a leader himself in Cofidis, which makes it surprising why the team did not want to keep him on board for 2025. “Most of the time I was the man who had to do it in the final. Especially because I turned out to be one of the strongest riders in the team. But of course I also need support in the final to be able to make a difference. We also very often ended up in the situation that we were riding with a team where the majority did not have a contract. Everyone rode for themselves. If you then have to ride against strong blocks, you don't stand a chance.”
A difficult situation that the team found itself, which then ultimately affects it's riders as well. “I find that very strange. In our team, half of them were not renewed. Of course there are always lesser riders who still have a contract, riders who already had a contract for two years. In that respect I find it strange. Especially when they say that age is a problem. In the end, age doesn't matter if you ride better than others? But for me it's not a problem, I'm not going to worry about it.”
Read also
Hermans has already been a pro rider since 2007 and has raced at the highest level of the sport since 2010. Since he's had quite a few injuries and is aware of the risks that come with being a pro cyclist, which is part of the reason why he is not too fond of signing a new contract with a low salary - something he may still be offered by a few teams, taking into consideration his recent results.
“Partly financial. But also, an offer from a continental team or a lesser ProTeam, I am less able to charge myself for that. I fully understand that it can be a decent team for a young rider who wants to grow and learn. But I am not interested in that anymore," he explains. "I also know well enough what dangers there are in the sport, I have been in hospital often enough. The sacrifices are not a problem for me, but I am not going to take risks for the minimum wage anymore.”
Read also

Rúben SilvaEditor-in-Chief
A founding contributor to CyclingUpToDate since its launch in January 2022, Ruben Silva has played a central role in shaping the site’s editorial direction and long-term growth. Before joining the project, he built his experience through independent blogging at Echelons Hub and by producing race previews for Ciclismo Internacional, developing a strong analytical voice rooted in daily engagement with professional cycling.
Beyond editorial work, he has been closely involved in the expansion and coordination of CyclingUpToDate’s wider network, helping establish and support sister platforms across multiple languages. This includes ongoing collaboration with CiclismoAlDia (Spanish), CiclismoAtual (Portuguese), WielrennenUpToDate (Dutch), and RadsportAktuell (German), contributing to a shared editorial vision and consistent international coverage.
He also helps oversee editorial governance across the network, setting standards for accuracy and consistency and coordinating updates or corrections when needed.
Originally from the Porto metropolitan area in Portugal, he holds a bachelor’s degree in Geography. His path into cycling journalism was shaped not through formal media training, but through independent reporting, community engagement, and sustained on-the-ground involvement in the sport.
Over the course of his career, he has conducted approximately 100 interviews across road cycling and cyclocross, ranging from one-to-one conversations and online formats to press conferences and on-site pre- and post-race coverage. His interviews include leading riders, team managers, and prominent figures within cycling media: Tadej Pogacar, Jonas Vingegaard, Mathieu van der Poel, Primoz Roglic, Wout van Aert, Joao Almeida and Tom Pidcock; managers like Patrick Lefevere and Joxean Matxin; and YouTube personality Bryan Kennedy (BKXC)...
Within 18 months of launch, he helped grow CyclingUpToDate’s English-language platform into one of the most-read cycling news websites, built entirely from the ground up. As both a professional journalist and lifelong cycling enthusiast, his focus remains on delivering accurate, timely, and well-contextualized coverage.
claps 0visitors 0
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- He is boring
leedorney08-11-2026 - To Twoje przemyślenia te bla, bla :)
Dariusz08-11-2026 - Uwielbiam patrzeć, jak wyjeżdża na czoło peletonu i zaczyna się rzeź...
Dariusz08-11-2026 - Yeah, unreal.
parisbound0008-11-2026 - there needs to be space in life for pointless comments!Ketterechts08-11-2026
- That is a very lazy way of putting it but so far on this website it seems like everyone is happy to look at everything lazily, even things that annoy them intensely. All they want to do is state their feeling and position but ask most to analyse a problem or come up with solutions or improvements and you’re stunned by silence. Nobody even really knows how this all happens. It’s very simple and quick to just say the UCI did it but I bet you they didn’t, I bet you not more than 2 people were involved, more likely just 1. The UCI may be ultimately responsible but it is not their decision, this is about hierarchy, power and delegation. The fact that protest is possible also means it isn’t over and that MORE people could get involved for a thorough review which could throw up anything. It is highly likely it was a sole commissar who decided and has that power in a first round. Therein might lie the problem the UCI has to consider, is it acceptable to give so much authority to one single person when it is quite possible for them to have a natural bias or be too easily susceptible to imposed bias. Who is to say an individual in this position isn’t susceptible to collaboration with outside players with interests in the results, nations, families, teams, betting companies, etc. On the one hand we have sports where these problems have been worked on way more to reduce such problems, on the other hand we have sports with far stricter and more draconian rules not even concerning safety or obstruction that nobody really questions like false starts or stepping out of lane or zones in athletics. If cycling hastowork on itself, it would be good if protagonists (all kinds) would start doing a little more than just moaning over outcomes.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- Yes, so why not make comments less pointless?Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- What a race! I didn't expect Vanthourenhout to collapse like that, and Wyseure did take the fight to Nys, but there was no doubt at the end. I also wonder what Aubin Sparfel would be capable of were he to race in the elites now. In the U23 ranks he is making good work of Giel Lejeune, who himself is among the better riders in the elites, and a top 10 contender in the big races (3rd at Kleebergcross, 8th at Berencross and 5th at Heerderstrand). In the French Cup, Sparfel is significantly better than Romain Debord (8th at Koppenbergcross and 10th at the Euros) and Rémi Lelandais (12th at Koppenbergcross and 19th at the Euros).
Rafionain-Glas08-11-2026 - There really was nothing in it. Schreiber was so much faster, and Brand was fighting to stay in the wheel in the sprint. Schreiber did move a bit, but to say she closed the door doesn't make sense because Brand couldn't enter it anyway, abd she wasn't impeded.
Rafionain-Glas08-11-2026 - He should have been allowed to go to Movistar. Right now both arent a good fit for each other and are just wasting each other's time and effortabstractengineer08-11-2026
Loading
1 Comments










