Latest comments
- Yes,
That said, if Seixas loses by a small margin (can anyone define that?) what will the conclusion be:
For now
For the future
For sure it won’t be an objective debate
- One day, a whole TdF outside France
- Why do all pundits an past pros have to advise the current crop publicly, surely it is THE most inefficient method?
Not sure to notice, or understand.
Competition will also take note.
Becomes a debate hiding the original advice.
Surely all these people have i sider access or can message discretely through contacts?
- Only Brits would think of turning that into a discussion.
Fact is, in today’s cycling, you’re not going to be winning much if you’re partial to the drink and parties of the lads (e.g. Bjarne’s boys) of less than even 2 decades ago.
- Madiot got tired of subtly defaming Tadej ("it's not possible", "there are results I don't believe," "certain team blablabla", etc.).
Now that they apparently have their national phenomenon with precocious good results, the doubts and malicious insinuations disappear: Tadej is an alien and the young national phenomenon is the Messiah :-)
- Is Seixas the Marquez to Pogacar's Rossi? Let's see his palmares when he is 25, not 19.
- since when is Quinn Simmons a gravel expert lol
- How many cycling team bosses ever say anything worth hearing? Seixas is clearly very special but we don't need pundits to tell us or add hype.
- but isn't there an equally good chance MVDP would have also dropped Florian when dropping Van Dyke?
I don't think he cared much either way. MVDP was going to do the work, and had his plan as to when/where to make a move. it was not contingent upon others doing work with him.
thing is so overplayed. MVDP and Florian are buds. that's all. I saw the video, it wasn't all that at the end of the race. he didn't full on snub van dyke. and van dyke didn't exactly try to embrace MVDP.
- wtf does this mean
Loading