"There was definitely more possible today - But I have to admit I didn't have the legs" - Wout van Aert misses top-10 in frantic return to action in Quebec
Cycling
Wout van Aert was back in action on Friday at the 2025 GP de Québec, but the Belgian star was left with "mixed feelings" after finishing 14th in a chaotic and unusually open edition of the Canadian World Tour classic. Despite strong intentions from Team Visma | Lease a Bike to race conservatively early and strike late, the race split before the final lap, and Van Aert found himself out of position when it mattered most.
“We weren’t positioned well enough once the finale began,” Van Aert admitted post-race in comments to Visma's official website. “We couldn’t follow the counterattacks, and the chase never really got organised. The plan was for Tiesj and me to save something for the last lap. Unfortunately, that didn’t work out.”
Read also
Visma Plan Unravels as Race Blows Apart Early
The 2025 edition of the GP de Québec featured a modified final circuit designed to increase difficulty — with the usual fast descents stripped out in favour of a punchier finish. That alteration helped encourage early aggression, with Tim Wellens and UAE sparking a flurry of moves from over 80 kilometres out, dragging the likes of Alaphilippe, Sivakov, Bettiol, and Skjelmose into a select front group that would never be caught.
Visma attempted to control things from behind, holding Van Aert and Tiesj Benoot in reserve. But the break’s cooperation — and the lack of a unified chase effort — meant the race slipped away before Visma could deploy their finishing strategy. “We had to react a bit too early to neutralize attacks,” Van Aert explained. “By the final ascent of the climb, we were no longer riding for the win but just for a place of honour.”
Despite their efforts, neither Van Aert nor Benoot was able to feature in the final selection, and Alaphilippe’s perfectly timed attack on the steep final ramp secured the win. Van Aert rolled in 14th, visibly disappointed, but honest in his self-assessment.

Van Aert & Benoot have formed a regular Classics duo for Visma over recent seasons
“Mixed Feelings” as Return to Racing Falls Short of Expectations
“There was definitely more possible today,” Van Aert said. “But I also have to admit that I simply didn’t have the legs to win. I look back with mixed feelings.”
The race marked Van Aert’s first appearance since the Deutschland Tour, and while his return was always going to be a test of form and timing, the outcome underscored how unforgiving the one-day calendar can be when tactics don’t align with the race scenario.
Van Aert will now look ahead to GP Montréal, where Visma may need to revise their approach if they hope to counter the high-tempo racing UAE and others seem committed to imposing.
Read also

Kieran WoodDeputy Editor-in-Chief
Kieran Wood is a sports journalist based in Wales and has been active in journalism since 2022. He regularly contributes to DartsNews.com and CyclingUpToDate.com, where he covers professional cycling and darts. In cycling, his work includes liveblogs from major races, including the Tour de France, the Giro d’Italia, and La Vuelta a España, alongside race reports and analysis. He has also conducted interviews with professional riders.
His reporting spans the full racing calendar, from one-day classics to stage races, with a focus on accurate, real-time coverage and clear contextual analysis. For statistics, results, and historical context, he regularly uses resources such as ProCyclingStats. To support reporting on rider activity and training context where relevant, he also references Strava.
In his work, Kieran places strong emphasis on careful sourcing, editorial accuracy, and updating articles as new, verified information becomes available.
claps 0visitors 0
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- He should have been allowed to go to Movistar. Right now both arent a good fit for each other and are just wasting each other's time and effortabstractengineer08-11-2026
- Thibau Nys does exactly what Iserbyt is calling for
Rafionain-Glas08-11-2026 - i did not see it. was the relegation justified or an overly hard decision? and don‘t cross riders deviate from straight lines all the time? bumping into each others when they cut corners, etc … why being more strict with the rules on the finish sprint?Ketterechts08-11-2026
- seems like we are advertising the website with pointless comments…Ketterechts08-11-2026
- So?Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- The UCI do have their favorites.
Front24208-11-2026 - On a positive note, you maybe notice turning this topic into a discussion has the benefit of eliminating certain participants who do not see how they can turn it back to their sole interest ;-)Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- People see what they want to. I am actually the opposite of your accusation, probably more of a rebel than most of you who don’t get the big picture. The difference is, I don’t go moaning publicly about the consequences of my transgressions, I understand the need for rules and I take my OWN responsibility when deciding to ignore or break them or doing so involuntarily. I will also not hesitate to state my case or argue vehemently when relevant, sometimes it works, sometimes it makes things worse but that’s the price to pay for principles and having character.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- That may be but that was unknown to others and nothing says that’s the whole truth. Again, don’t try to misinterpret, it is a call and technically it is correct. Besides, even if there is a valid reason, that does not disqualify the ruling or punishment as far as the rules have been developed. I don’t think they’re as far as in football where for handball there is a distinction (in some ways and specific cases) between intentional or not. And football can be just as harsh and people live with it, eg the offside rule, also judged to within tiny fractions but often wrong or ignored. It’s the nature of every collective organisation and sometimes I wonder if our rebellion against it isn’t seated in the feelings we carry from the injustices we’ve felt personally, like being flashed driving 1km/h too fast when we are explained limits are just a security measure but we are absolutely certain not to have endangered anyone with our transgression. The problem is, nobody has better solutions and no 2 people have the same interpretation of where a limit should be.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- Because for you deviated implies the other rider MUST have been made to fall and fail to finish ??? I don’t know if you ride a bike but next time someone carves you up or drives dangerously close, just hold back from those feelings of changing something, reporting or filming or even complaining. Everyone will just say, hey you’re still here undamaged, doesn’t seem like anyone did anything.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
Loading
Write a comment








