“The agreement is not about money” – Insider reveals how the Giro d'Italia persuaded Jonas Vingegaard to race in Italy

When a rider of Jonas Vingegaard’s calibre changes his season around a race that is not the Tour de France, people assume there must be something big behind it. Big money. Big pressure. Big deals.

According to Giuseppe Martinelli, who has managed champions like Marco Pantani, Alberto Contador and Vincenzo Nibali, the reality is far simpler and far more sporting.

“The agreement is not about money,” Martinelli said in an interview with Bici.Pro. “For me it is difficult to believe they really pay a rider or a team. There is a reimbursement of expenses, but that is the same for everyone.”

Martinelli, who has inside knowledge of these kinds of situations from his own career, says that if a race like the Giro d’Italia wants a Tour-level superstar like Vingegaard, the conversation starts somewhere else entirely.

For Martinelli, the first and most important part of any understanding between a Grand Tour and a champion is the route. “The first thing to understand together, if you want a rider at Vingegaard’s level, is the route,” he explained. Not a course designed to flatter organisers, but one that fits into a rider’s bigger season.

That matters especially for Vingegaard because the Giro in 2026 is not his main target. The Tour de France still is.

In his own words, Vingegaard has said that his build-up to the Tour has followed the same pattern for five years, and that choosing the Giro is about trying something new. Martinelli believes that only works if the Giro itself is shaped in a way that makes a Giro-Tour double realistic.

In practical terms, that means a course that is not excessively hard and does not leave a rider destroyed before July. In Martinelli’s view, this is exactly why the Giro can make sense for Vingegaard now.

After two second places at the Tour de France behind Tadej Pogacar, Vingegaard’s 2026 season is being read through one lens: does this help him beat Pogacar?

Some experts have argued that riding the Giro could weaken him for the Tour. Others believe it could sharpen him. Martinelli falls into the second camp. “It almost suits Vingegaard more to come to the Giro than the other way round,” he said. After two straight runner-up finishes in France, a Giro win would not just add a trophy, but complete the set of Grand Tour victories.

That matters for motivation. Vingegaard himself has openly spoken about wanting to win in Italy after already winning in France and Spain. For him, the Giro is not a consolation prize. It is a missing piece.

Martinelli’s view is that the Giro does not simply benefit from having Vingegaard. Vingegaard benefits from having the Giro in his season.

Another part of Martinelli’s explanation is timing. “The fact that Vingegaard announced it on 13 January is a formal date,” he said. “Between Visma and the Giro, in my opinion, contacts started much earlier.”

In other words, this is not a late winter gamble. It is a plan that has likely been forming since last season, possibly even since the end of the Tour. That fits with what Vingegaard and Visma have said about wanting a new path after repeating the same Tour preparation for years.

This is also why Martinelli dismisses the idea of short-term incentives. A decision like this is about the entire season, not about appearance fees.

Martinelli is blunt about the idea of paying riders to show up. “I cannot even imagine an organisation paying a rider just to take part, and I would not find it correct,” he said. For him, the prestige goes both ways. A great champion lifts a race, but a great race also lifts a champion’s career.

If Vingegaard were to win the Giro, he would complete the so-called Triple Crown of Grand Tour victories. That is not something you buy. That is something you build a career around.

In that sense, Martinelli believes Visma’s thinking is simple. They are not chasing financial side deals. They are chasing the best sporting path.

None of this exists in a vacuum. Everything Vingegaard does in 2026 will be judged against Pogacar.

Some see the Giro as a risk. Others see it as a way to change the terms of the rivalry. Martinelli’s explanation suggests a third view: that the Giro is not an escape from the Tour, but part of the same long game.

If the route suits him, if the build-up is controlled, and if the motivation is right, then the Giro is not a distraction. It is a tool.

And if Martinelli is right, the reason Jonas Vingegaard is going to Italy in 2026 is not money, not pressure, and not compromise.

It is because, in purely sporting terms, the Giro finally fits exactly what he needs.