Good luck, guys 👊 #UAETour
Patrick Lefevere believes Tim Merlier can take step above Jasper Philipsen: "Tim is always calm, he can do it alone"
CyclingThursday, 22 February 2024 at 12:01
Tim Merlier has won at the Saudi Tour and UAE Tour already this year, whilst Jasper Philipsen has not yet begun his season. Soudal - Quick-Step manager Patrick Lefevere is keen on comparing the two of them and believes his man can have an advantage.
"If you see who Tim beat here, they are the fastest guys in the world. The sprint is always very hectic, there is confusion but he doesn't need the lead-out of five men to be able to win," Lefevere said in words to GCN at the UAE Tour. "I think Jasper is a more nervous sprinter, Tim is always calm, he can do it alone. If he has a lead-out, of course, it is better, but Jasper needs space or he boxes space, as you saw last year at the Tour."
The Belgian team has supported Merlier to 11 wins in 2023, 5 of them at World Tour level. A very decent level for a rider that was not even taken to a Grand Tour - which may happen once again this year, although the Giro d'Italia may be in his plans as the team goes all-in for the overall classification at the Tour de France.
"He will be at Tirreno and also the Belgian races because he is Flemish. We think he is able to win Gent-Wevelgem unless they make that race too hard," Lefevere believes. The Belgian sprinter has in the past done quite well in the cobbled classics and will hope to have his best form in display at the time. "I don't see why it needs to do the Kemmelberg three times. He's a former cyclo-crosser so he should be good in Paris-Roubaix as well."
Read also
claps 0visitors 0
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- RIP Gianni Savio.
santiagobenites31-12-2024 - First in here needs to tell everyone else which low level story we can pump clicks into to discuss humanity's trauser stain or politics, otherwise the bots will keep pushing LA data up to the content decision makers. So tired of seeing anything LA related because it does not provoke any meaningful discussion. It just provokes long held polarized views from the early 2000s.northcarolinaeric31-12-2024
- Amazing age for a man, especially an elite athlete. RIPMistermaumau31-12-2024
- Cheating can take minutes and happen completely spontaneously or (not so rare in the current world) as part of a set-up amongst many scenarios. Also cheating thresholds are completely different for everyone but I really don’t think the question is of interest seeing as it’s not true, or is there a need for any of us knowing who was accused, for what reason and by who if they themselves don’t seem interested? Another team trying to sabotage his relationship to weaken his guard for a better negotiation position in a future transfer discussion hiding behind free speech liberties, is that what you’re hoping to discover?Mistermaumau31-12-2024
- That simply cannot be true. He's been attacking and winning from afar all year before that and suddenly he bonked because he went too early, with most of that being a climb? There's absolutely no reason to believe that he did the same watts as on PdB a few days later because he went from "too far", with the efforts being 12:30 vs almost 40 minutesvappaxbipmv31-12-2024
- If Rog has to only follow, then he needs only 3 exclusive teammates, 2 for mountains and one for flats and the other can chip in where neededabstractengineer31-12-2024
- Lemond's bias against LA shows, not that it is unwarranted. The 1990-1999 era was 60% HCT era, the worst ever, completely unrestricted, God level, Its only after the 50% Hct rule came up that people came down to alien levelsabstractengineer31-12-2024
- Who cheated? When did he get time to cheat between the accidents and the races and training?abstractengineer31-12-2024
- And before anyone says this is not cycling related, sorry but issues such as FS are related to EVERYTHING. Once you understand that everything is connecting and influencing, you see through the fake safety of imagining cycling is not affected. False doping accusations would be an evident subject which could lead to catastrophic real consequences one day. If someone had spent efforts building a public accusation campaign against someone like MVDP, those beer throwing rival « fans » might have resorted to a worse form of assault believing they were justified.Mistermaumau31-12-2024
- Like I said before, everyone will place the cursor in a different place but I can guarantee you there is no such thing as true free speech, and if you were to take a small group (say 20, men and women unequally distributed to make it less artificial) of true believers, stick them on a deserted island with unlimited food and water I’d say it would take way less than just a year for them to destroy their civilization. Free speech advocates are almost always hypocrites too, arguing for it when it suits them but very quickly turning to censorship or whatever other tactics they feel comfortable with to silence those they can’t live with, That Eel on Mist is the latest to have succumbed to the reality of not being able to practice what he preaches. If you think about it probably the most perfect FSA you can find is completely the opposite of how you’d imagine one, the confessional priest, he allows you to say whatever you want without risk of consequences. The US has done many great and awful things but one thing it does very little, unlike you, is to reflect, being too busy reaching for goals (again not always very deeply thought through ones). Things people say lead to things people think, feel and act upon, if you give people total immunity for what they say it will provoke acts (every imaginable kind), often irreversible and destructive. If the US wants to enjoy the risks and accepts the costs, fine but please fight amongst and keep it to yourselves, stop exporting it. You can feel good about the artificial advantages you can claim to have obtained (let’s ignore how and the hypocrisy of preaching others shouldn’t do likewise because all of us in similar civilisation are more or less in that position) over those of us living in safer, stabler, healthier, happier, longer-lasting, more respectful and humbler societies. Nothing personal but it’s clear that if it hasn’t yet, it won’t be long before the good that comes or came from a form of free speech that existed but which users exercised with wisdom will be submerged by the harm being done by a few who are manipulating the original (contextually good, obvious and logical) INTENT of it for their agenda. Current FSA are like lawyers looking for loopholes in contracts in order to argue against the original purpose of the contract, protecting both sides equally and not allowing one side to technically knock out the other for personal gain.Mistermaumau31-12-2024