
As every day after a great stage of the Vuelta a España, Johan Bruyneel analyzed what happened on Lance Armstrong's Youtube podcast 'The Move'. This time it was time to talk about stage 16, in which Jonas Vingegaard attacked at the finish in Bejes and ended up taking the win. Primoz Roglic also attacked and Sepp Kuss lost seconds to his two rivals for the red and teammates in Jumbo-Visma. The former US Postal sport director understood Vingegaard's move, though less so Roglic's.
"I don't think Vingegaard's move was smart, but it seems there are no more gifts or more speeches in their cycling, when they have an opportunity to go for the win you do it and that's what happened and I think when Jumbo-Visma came with their 3 riders on the skirts of the final climb they knew one of them was going to win, we can't blame them for that," Bruyneel explained.
Read also
The Belgian thinks the Jumbos are riding individually: "Jonas Vingegaard's attack was more or less the same as what happened on the Tourmalet. I thought maybe Kuss wasn't feeling very well, but when one of your teammates is not feeling well what you don't do is attack to show their weaknesses. So I think what they are doing is deciding for themselves and they are going off to see if the stronger one can win."
Click here to create your own Fantasy
team for the Fantasy Vuelta a España stage 17 (RtL). 1st prize is
$10,930/€10,000/£8,586!!
So Bruyneel understands Vingegaard's attack, but not UAE Team Emirates' reaction: "I understand what Jumbo did, but not what UAE did, Vingegaard, the third, attacked and put the pressure on other teams, especially UAE, but what we saw was Fisher Black trying to follow him, not João Almeida, who accelerated once, or Marc Soler, who did nothing. I think at least 40 seconds of what Vingegaard got out of the total minute is because in the less hard zone where he attacked the guys behind looked at each other and didn't do anything."
Read also
He did not understand Primoz Roglic's attack and still believes that Sepp Kuss is the favorite to win the Vuelta a España despite barely half a minute ahead of Vingegaard before the Alto de l'Angliru:
About PRIMOZ ROGLIC
"What I didn't understand was Primoz Roglic's counterattack, unless he thought he was going to leave them all, but he didn't, he went 10 meters and stopped seeing that Enric Mas and Juan Ayuso stuck to his wheel and Sepp Kuss showed weaknesses. I think it was strange to see. I think the initial plan is that the stage was perfect for Primoz, but when Vingegaard attacked and took the 40 seconds the Slovenian thought he could still win and went away and then he saw he didn't have the legs to do it.
Read also
About JUMBO VISMA
"If you look at the final result, it was a great move for Jumbo-Visma, because you have Sepp Kuss still in the lead with the same advantage and you have Jonas Vingegaard with a minute more advantage over Juan Ayuso and Enric Mas."
About SEPP KUSS
"I still believe that Sepp Kuss is going to win this Vuelta a España. Yesterday's stage didn't suit his characteristics, I think today's stage is much better for him."
Read also

Juan LarraCycling Journalist
Juan Larra is a writer for Cyclinguptodate and editor-in-chief of Ciclismoaldia, where he has played a central role since its inception. Under his leadership, the website has become a trusted source for professional cycling coverage, offering in-depth analysis, news, and feature stories.
A sports journalist with over 20 years of experience, Juan earned his degree in Journalism from the University of Seville in 2007. He began his career covering a wide range of sports—including football, basketball, Formula 1, MotoGP, tennis, and cycling—for platforms such as the official La Liga app, Vodafone and Movistar websites, NBA Blogdebasket, and Cadena Cope, honing his skills in writing and editorial management.
In addition to his work at Ciclismoaldia, Juan contributes to Cyclinguptodate and serves as editor-in-chief for the tennis-focused site Tenisaldia. Throughout his career, he has conducted exclusive interviews with cyclists and sports figures, provided detailed analysis of competitions ranging from local Spanish races to major international events, and acted as a special correspondent at prestigious races including Paris-Roubaix, the Tour de France, and the Vuelta a España.
Juan’s combination of experience, expertise, and direct access to athletes has established him—and the platforms he leads—as authoritative voices in professional cycling.
claps 2visitors 1
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- Are you MrMauMau 2.0? Nothing you are saying is really relevant. Vaguely connected, but irrelevant. The conversation is whether Schreiber impeded Brand or not.
Rafionain-Glas08-11-2026 - He is boring
leedorney08-11-2026 - To Twoje przemyślenia te bla, bla :)
Dariusz08-11-2026 - Uwielbiam patrzeć, jak wyjeżdża na czoło peletonu i zaczyna się rzeź...
Dariusz08-11-2026 - Yeah, unreal.
parisbound0008-11-2026 - there needs to be space in life for pointless comments!Ketterechts08-11-2026
- That is a very lazy way of putting it but so far on this website it seems like everyone is happy to look at everything lazily, even things that annoy them intensely. All they want to do is state their feeling and position but ask most to analyse a problem or come up with solutions or improvements and you’re stunned by silence. Nobody even really knows how this all happens. It’s very simple and quick to just say the UCI did it but I bet you they didn’t, I bet you not more than 2 people were involved, more likely just 1. The UCI may be ultimately responsible but it is not their decision, this is about hierarchy, power and delegation. The fact that protest is possible also means it isn’t over and that MORE people could get involved for a thorough review which could throw up anything. It is highly likely it was a sole commissar who decided and has that power in a first round. Therein might lie the problem the UCI has to consider, is it acceptable to give so much authority to one single person when it is quite possible for them to have a natural bias or be too easily susceptible to imposed bias. Who is to say an individual in this position isn’t susceptible to collaboration with outside players with interests in the results, nations, families, teams, betting companies, etc. On the one hand we have sports where these problems have been worked on way more to reduce such problems, on the other hand we have sports with far stricter and more draconian rules not even concerning safety or obstruction that nobody really questions like false starts or stepping out of lane or zones in athletics. If cycling hastowork on itself, it would be good if protagonists (all kinds) would start doing a little more than just moaning over outcomes.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- Yes, so why not make comments less pointless?Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- What a race! I didn't expect Vanthourenhout to collapse like that, and Wyseure did take the fight to Nys, but there was no doubt at the end. I also wonder what Aubin Sparfel would be capable of were he to race in the elites now. In the U23 ranks he is making good work of Giel Lejeune, who himself is among the better riders in the elites, and a top 10 contender in the big races (3rd at Kleebergcross, 8th at Berencross and 5th at Heerderstrand). In the French Cup, Sparfel is significantly better than Romain Debord (8th at Koppenbergcross and 10th at the Euros) and Rémi Lelandais (12th at Koppenbergcross and 19th at the Euros).
Rafionain-Glas08-11-2026 - There really was nothing in it. Schreiber was so much faster, and Brand was fighting to stay in the wheel in the sprint. Schreiber did move a bit, but to say she closed the door doesn't make sense because Brand couldn't enter it anyway, abd she wasn't impeded.
Rafionain-Glas08-11-2026
Loading
Write a comment









