INTERVIEW | World Tour nutritionist examines Tadej Pogacar's Tour de France implosion and use of ketones in the peloton
Cycling
Cycling is a sport that involves unmentionable complexity. Among many of the crucial aspects of the sport lies the riders' diets and fueling strategies for both training and racing. We have talked to Israel - Premier Tech's Gabriel Martins, who is a leading figure in sports nutrition about the use of ketones in the peloton, and the famous implosion at the Col du Granon which saw Tadej Pogacar lose the Tour de France.
This article is part of a longer interview with Gabriel Martins. Part 2 will be published on the 18th of December (Sunday) on CyclingUpToDate.
One of the most dramatic moments of the year was without a doubt Tadej Pogacar's difficulties at the Col du Granon on the 11th stage of the Tour de France this year. The Slovenian, who had conquered the past two editions of the Grand Boucle, was leading the Tour and little looked to be possible to take it away from him. As Jonas Vingegaard attacked up the slopes of the high-altitude pass, the demoralized figure of Pogacar was a shocking sight as he was overtaken by several of his rivals, and ended up losing minutes that he was to never gain back.
Read also
This ended up being crucial, as Jonas Vingegaard never again showed fragility and has ridden into the win at the Tour based on consistency. On that day, Pogacar had started the stage with a lead of 39 seconds over Vingegaard and 2:52 minutes on Primoz Roglic. He had won the hilltop and mountain finishes towards Longwy and La Planche des Belles Filles, and following an ideal run-up, he entered the second week with great form and the lead of the race, aswell as a strong support crew.
Stage 11 would see the riders go up the Col du Galibier, with the Col du Télégraphe beforehand. Near the summit of the latter Primoz Roglic launched an attack, bridging across to Christophe Laporte and setting things off. At the base of the Galibier Roglic and Vingegaard took turns attacking as Pogacar was forced to answer all moves, before Pogacar himself made a move up the climb to distance Roglic - before all came back together in the valley run to the final climb.
Read also
"What Jumbo Visma did to basically make him unable to respond to attacks," Martins said in an interview with CyclingUpToDate and CiclismoAldia. "What happened was that simply a lesson in physiology." Martins has been part of the Israeli team since 2020 and carries with him three years of direct experience with World Tour riders, including the likes of Chris Froome, Jakob Fuglsang and Michael Woods.
"It wasn't so much the nutritional level, it was said that he missed a series of one or two feedings and couldn't eat what he was supposed to eat... The way to get that giant down was to distribute and make a series of attacks in which he had to respond to all the attacks... attacked one, attacked another, attacked another and that later made his glycogen reserves, no matter how much he had to eat well or not, however much he missed a bottle or not, which may have been the case, it has in consequence and he was completely spent."
Read also
The Col du Granon, it was an 11.4 kilometer climb at 9.1%, with the finale at 2404 meters of altitude. That would be the pivotal ascent of this race. Although it did not appear at first, Pogacar was to soon be in serious difficulties. The weight of the accelerations would weight on him here, as he could not respond to Vingegaard's attack, but soon could not follow the pace of Geraint Thomas, or David Gaudu, or Adam Yates... The 2:51 minutes shed on the road were vital.
"Jumbo
managed to still have Vingegaard more or less fresh, maybe he made two attacks
while Pogacar already had to respond to six or seven and that made the
difference, maybe not on a nutritional level, but it was on a physiological
level," Martins continued. "He spent glycogen, which was the fuel needed at that time, and made a
rider (Vingegaard, ed.) who was in better shape and fresher and with superior glycogen reserves,
made him able to be victorious that day."
Another question that is quite common, and perhaps controversial in cycling, is that of the use of Ketones. Labeled by some as a 'miracle drink', by others as something which does not affect performance, it has for some years been a divisive topic in the peloton, specially as claims and criticism circulated of very large improvements and a peloton that "operates at two speeds" according to Thibaut Pinot in a 2021 interview, for example.
While opinions vary, there is no direct answer yet to the ultimate question: Do ketones improve your cycling performance? The answer, which is not yet known, appears to be much more complex than it would sound. Teams in the MPCC riders do not use the substance as the long-term effects of it are not yet known, however those restrictions do not apply to the other teams, as it is not a prohibited substance.
Read also
To note that in 2022, 9 of the 18 World Tour teams were part of the MPCC (Movement for Credible Cycling, when translated to English): AG2R Citröen Team, BORA - hansgrohe, Cofidis, EF Education-EasyPost, Groupama-FDJ, Intermarché - Wanty - Gobert Matériaux, Israel - Premier Tech, Lotto Soudal and Team DSM. Furthermore, 16 out of 18 Pro Teams (exceptions of EOLO-Kometa and the now disbanded Gazprom-Rusvelo) and 6 out of 14 Women's World Tour teams (EF Education-TIBCO-SVB, FDJ Nouvelle-Aquitaine Futuroscope, Human Powered Health, Plantur-Pura, Team DSM and Uno-X Pro Cycling Team) are part of it.
What does Gabriel Martins think of it? "I don't think it increases performance, the idea that it can increase performance is possibly due to some perception." Many argue that the timing of usage, the doses and the requirements to mix ketones with other types of (legal) substances are required to bring any benefit. A large portion of the studies regarding it suggest positive results are much more likely to be achieved in recovery and not in power output or endurance itself.
Read also
"Ketones are always a controversial issue, if we look at the research we see that it is still too early to say that ketones do or contribute to anything, what it seems to indicate is that it may have some effect on the level of recovery because it is related to some mechanisms that increase recovery," he argues.
"There's some very recent work from about a month ago, I think it shows that supplementing with ketones has a slight increase in Erythropoietin (more commonly known as EPO, ed.). It's still something that needs to be proven it needs service to actually be such a significant increase for it to be able to be used."
Although those words are not often said, a small portion of cycling fans believe the use of ketones should be considered a form of doping. However Martins argues why that is not a sensible decision at this point in time. "It took us 100 years to be able to say that caffeine and creatine and sodium bicarbonate really work and now suddenly in this era of immediate everything it seems that 5, 6 years of research with ketones is enough with 3 or 4 studies that show some thing for this to really do something."
Evidence is simply not yet enough to determine the effects of the substance. In the meanwhile, it will likely remain in a grey area. "We have to stick to what's scientific and not what makes a positive feeling in the halls or in the individuals, so I think it's still a little premature to say anything about it," Martins says.
"By that I
also mean that it does not seem fair and coherent that they are considering
banning them, as has been seen in some forums. Banning the use of ketones on
the basis that they may cause some harmful effect." The nutritionist touches the key point that "there is no study that proves it can have a harmful effect" yet and that remains a big key to the whole debate, and that for there to be a ban on the substance, "that too needs substantiation."
Read also

Rúben SilvaEditor-in-Chief
A founding contributor to CyclingUpToDate since its launch in January 2022, Ruben Silva has played a central role in shaping the site’s editorial direction and long-term growth. Before joining the project, he built his experience through independent blogging at Echelons Hub and by producing race previews for Ciclismo Internacional, developing a strong analytical voice rooted in daily engagement with professional cycling.
Beyond editorial work, he has been closely involved in the expansion and coordination of CyclingUpToDate’s wider network, helping establish and support sister platforms across multiple languages. This includes ongoing collaboration with CiclismoAlDia (Spanish), CiclismoAtual (Portuguese), WielrennenUpToDate (Dutch), and RadsportAktuell (German), contributing to a shared editorial vision and consistent international coverage.
He also helps oversee editorial governance across the network, setting standards for accuracy and consistency and coordinating updates or corrections when needed.
Originally from the Porto metropolitan area in Portugal, he holds a bachelor’s degree in Geography. His path into cycling journalism was shaped not through formal media training, but through independent reporting, community engagement, and sustained on-the-ground involvement in the sport.
Over the course of his career, he has conducted approximately 100 interviews across road cycling and cyclocross, ranging from one-to-one conversations and online formats to press conferences and on-site pre- and post-race coverage. His interviews include leading riders, team managers, and prominent figures within cycling media: Tadej Pogacar, Jonas Vingegaard, Mathieu van der Poel, Primoz Roglic, Wout van Aert, Joao Almeida and Tom Pidcock; managers like Patrick Lefevere and Joxean Matxin; and YouTube personality Bryan Kennedy (BKXC)...
Within 18 months of launch, he helped grow CyclingUpToDate’s English-language platform into one of the most-read cycling news websites, built entirely from the ground up. As both a professional journalist and lifelong cycling enthusiast, his focus remains on delivering accurate, timely, and well-contextualized coverage.
claps 0visitors 0
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- He is boring
leedorney08-11-2026 - To Twoje przemyślenia te bla, bla :)
Dariusz08-11-2026 - Uwielbiam patrzeć, jak wyjeżdża na czoło peletonu i zaczyna się rzeź...
Dariusz08-11-2026 - Yeah, unreal.
parisbound0008-11-2026 - there needs to be space in life for pointless comments!Ketterechts08-11-2026
- That is a very lazy way of putting it but so far on this website it seems like everyone is happy to look at everything lazily, even things that annoy them intensely. All they want to do is state their feeling and position but ask most to analyse a problem or come up with solutions or improvements and you’re stunned by silence. Nobody even really knows how this all happens. It’s very simple and quick to just say the UCI did it but I bet you they didn’t, I bet you not more than 2 people were involved, more likely just 1. The UCI may be ultimately responsible but it is not their decision, this is about hierarchy, power and delegation. The fact that protest is possible also means it isn’t over and that MORE people could get involved for a thorough review which could throw up anything. It is highly likely it was a sole commissar who decided and has that power in a first round. Therein might lie the problem the UCI has to consider, is it acceptable to give so much authority to one single person when it is quite possible for them to have a natural bias or be too easily susceptible to imposed bias. Who is to say an individual in this position isn’t susceptible to collaboration with outside players with interests in the results, nations, families, teams, betting companies, etc. On the one hand we have sports where these problems have been worked on way more to reduce such problems, on the other hand we have sports with far stricter and more draconian rules not even concerning safety or obstruction that nobody really questions like false starts or stepping out of lane or zones in athletics. If cycling hastowork on itself, it would be good if protagonists (all kinds) would start doing a little more than just moaning over outcomes.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- Yes, so why not make comments less pointless?Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- What a race! I didn't expect Vanthourenhout to collapse like that, and Wyseure did take the fight to Nys, but there was no doubt at the end. I also wonder what Aubin Sparfel would be capable of were he to race in the elites now. In the U23 ranks he is making good work of Giel Lejeune, who himself is among the better riders in the elites, and a top 10 contender in the big races (3rd at Kleebergcross, 8th at Berencross and 5th at Heerderstrand). In the French Cup, Sparfel is significantly better than Romain Debord (8th at Koppenbergcross and 10th at the Euros) and Rémi Lelandais (12th at Koppenbergcross and 19th at the Euros).
Rafionain-Glas08-11-2026 - There really was nothing in it. Schreiber was so much faster, and Brand was fighting to stay in the wheel in the sprint. Schreiber did move a bit, but to say she closed the door doesn't make sense because Brand couldn't enter it anyway, abd she wasn't impeded.
Rafionain-Glas08-11-2026 - He should have been allowed to go to Movistar. Right now both arent a good fit for each other and are just wasting each other's time and effortabstractengineer08-11-2026
Loading
Who doesn’t love #NewKitDay?! 🔥 We’ve gone for something a little different for 2023. Blue and white with a splash of new color, and our star and P monogram on the back to help us stand out! Find out more about the inspiration behind our EKOÏ kit 👉 israelpremiertech.com/ipt-unveils-a-…
Write a comment









