
Stage 13 of the Vuelta a España brings the peloton
face-to-face with the climb that strikes fear into even the best riders in the
world: the Alto de l’Angliru. At 202 kilometers, the stage is long and
bruising, but it is the final 12.4 kilometres of road, averaging nearly 10
percent with ramps that lurch toward 25 percent, that will define the day.
Jonas Vingegaard, already in the red jersey and winner of two stages in this
year’s race, approaches it with one thing on his mind: victory.
"I would love to win for my son and daughter," he
told Sporza. "It's the race I really want to win. It's not that I have to
win, but I would love it to honor my son and daughter."
The Dane has been in formidable form throughout the Vuelta.
His consistency has allowed him to take command of the general classification, but
he has yet to truly test his legs like he will have to today. The Angliru is
unlike any other climb in professional cycling, a place where records are few
and time gaps can balloon beyond expectation. Roberto Heras’s ascent in 2000,
completed in 41 minutes 55 seconds, still stands as the fastest ever, a mark
that remains untouched after a quarter of a century. Can the Dane beat that
mark today?
Vingegaard himself knows exactly what to expect, having last
raced up the mountain in 2023 alongside his then teammate Primoz Roglic. That
edition ended with Roglič taking the stage victory, while Vingegaard finished just
behind him as the duo dropped their Visma teammate and eventual GC winner Sepp
Kuss. Now, two years later, with the red jersey on his shoulders, the challenge
comes with added weight.
Read also
"It's a special climb, and I love special climbs. But
it's also tough, so it's a love-hate relationship. It's going to be difficult,
all-in for everyone," he admitted. For Vingegaard, the key lies in
balancing control and instinct, knowing when to hold back and when to launch.
"I'm focusing on myself and trying to deliver the best possible
performance on the climb. Then we'll see what happens."
Rivals know that overcoming him will take something
extraordinary. João Almeida, sitting second overall, was candid about his
chances. "Win? You'll have to beat Jonas," he said. "That will
be a tough task. Hopefully, I have good legs."
Tom Pidcock, currently in third, is another threat. The
Briton has already shown flashes of strength, even managing to distance
Vingegaard two days ago on a climb. For him, the Angliru may present the best
opportunity yet. "It's not fun to climb, but I think it suits me,"
Pidcock said. "The steep sections will suit me more than the moderate
climbs we've already had. It will be very tough, but it's also a matter of
timing."
Read also
The Angliru has long been a kingmaker in the Vuelta. José
María “Chava” Jiménez claimed its first stage win in 1999, Roberto Heras set
his unmatched record the following year, and Alberto Contador sealed his
farewell victory on its brutal slopes in 2017. Many pundits, former and
currents riders have all described this climb as one of the most brutal in the
sport, perhaps worse than the likes of Alpe d’Huez and Mont Ventoux. The climb
is both legend and torment, a place where riders cannot hide and where even the
strongest are humbled. Even some of the biggest names could crack today.
For Vingegaard, winning atop the Angliru would not only
reinforce his control of the red jersey but also be one of the most important
victories of career. Can anyone challenge the favourite?
Read also
Fin MajorCycling Journalist
Fin Major is a UK-based writer at CyclingUpToDate and has been part of the team since 2024. He is the site’s main writer for FAQs and evergreen explainers and has written around 2,000 pieces for the platform. Alongside this work, he focuses on in-depth analysis and covers the biggest races on the calendar, including the Tour de France, the Giro d’Italia, and La Vuelta a España, providing clear context around performance trends, tactics, and key storylines.
In his reporting, Fin uses reputable data sources such as ProCyclingStats for results, statistics, and historical context. He places strong emphasis on careful sourcing, editorial accuracy, and updating articles promptly when new, verified information becomes available. Outside of writing, Fin is an active cyclist, which supports his practical understanding of the sport and its demands.
claps 0visitors 0
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- He is boring
leedorney08-11-2026 - To Twoje przemyślenia te bla, bla :)
Dariusz08-11-2026 - Uwielbiam patrzeć, jak wyjeżdża na czoło peletonu i zaczyna się rzeź...
Dariusz08-11-2026 - Yeah, unreal.
parisbound0008-11-2026 - there needs to be space in life for pointless comments!Ketterechts08-11-2026
- That is a very lazy way of putting it but so far on this website it seems like everyone is happy to look at everything lazily, even things that annoy them intensely. All they want to do is state their feeling and position but ask most to analyse a problem or come up with solutions or improvements and you’re stunned by silence. Nobody even really knows how this all happens. It’s very simple and quick to just say the UCI did it but I bet you they didn’t, I bet you not more than 2 people were involved, more likely just 1. The UCI may be ultimately responsible but it is not their decision, this is about hierarchy, power and delegation. The fact that protest is possible also means it isn’t over and that MORE people could get involved for a thorough review which could throw up anything. It is highly likely it was a sole commissar who decided and has that power in a first round. Therein might lie the problem the UCI has to consider, is it acceptable to give so much authority to one single person when it is quite possible for them to have a natural bias or be too easily susceptible to imposed bias. Who is to say an individual in this position isn’t susceptible to collaboration with outside players with interests in the results, nations, families, teams, betting companies, etc. On the one hand we have sports where these problems have been worked on way more to reduce such problems, on the other hand we have sports with far stricter and more draconian rules not even concerning safety or obstruction that nobody really questions like false starts or stepping out of lane or zones in athletics. If cycling hastowork on itself, it would be good if protagonists (all kinds) would start doing a little more than just moaning over outcomes.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- Yes, so why not make comments less pointless?Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- What a race! I didn't expect Vanthourenhout to collapse like that, and Wyseure did take the fight to Nys, but there was no doubt at the end. I also wonder what Aubin Sparfel would be capable of were he to race in the elites now. In the U23 ranks he is making good work of Giel Lejeune, who himself is among the better riders in the elites, and a top 10 contender in the big races (3rd at Kleebergcross, 8th at Berencross and 5th at Heerderstrand). In the French Cup, Sparfel is significantly better than Romain Debord (8th at Koppenbergcross and 10th at the Euros) and Rémi Lelandais (12th at Koppenbergcross and 19th at the Euros).
Rafionain-Glas08-11-2026 - There really was nothing in it. Schreiber was so much faster, and Brand was fighting to stay in the wheel in the sprint. Schreiber did move a bit, but to say she closed the door doesn't make sense because Brand couldn't enter it anyway, abd she wasn't impeded.
Rafionain-Glas08-11-2026 - He should have been allowed to go to Movistar. Right now both arent a good fit for each other and are just wasting each other's time and effortabstractengineer08-11-2026
Loading
1 Comments










