"I later talked about this one-on-one with Primoz, and then raised it in the group" - Merijn Zeeman shares details and lessons from 2023 Vuelta a Espana and Angliru drama
Cycling
Stage 17 of the 2023 Vuelta a Espana was an unique moment in the cycling season and perhaps in the history of cycling. Three teammates of the same team dominating a Grand Tour and battling among each other for the overall win on the insanely hard Alto de l'Angliru. Merijn Zeeman, DS of Jumbo-Visma at the time, recalls his time in the car and after that day and how he handled the trio.
“With three leaders during the Vuelta, I couldn't be in a better place to develop my own leadership style and learn lessons. Because this was definitely very extreme," Zeeman told Masters Magazine. "What I have especially experienced is the power of realizing what our culture is and what our values are. That turned out to be the railing I could hold on to. Starting with our strategy. We completely surprised our opponents with the way we rode. We kept attacking. Even when we were in the lead. The motto has always been that we keep attacking so that we never have to defend. Only there was no scenario for when we were at one, two or three, the moment when there was no one left to attack. Suddenly there were three of us, but the option of attacking each other had always remained undiscussed.”
Read also
Sepp Kuss rode to a breakaway win on the first week, and the buffer he had allowed Jumbo-Visma to have a three-pronged attack for the red jersey. On stage 13, the first multi-mountain stage in the race, they looked to have no competition for the overall win however. However as Kuss' lead was being cut, both Jonas Vingegaard and Primoz Roglic - the latter mainly - looked to gain time and try to jump to the race lead. Then came stage 17, and on the slopes of the Alto de l'Angliru, the trio literally dropped the rest of the competition. But Primoz Roglic had his own ambition of winning the race and pushed enough to drop race leader Kuss.
“When Roglic felt good, he thought he could take the red jersey at the expense of Kuss and launched an attack against his own teammate. With the risk that Kuss would have to let go and someone else would come on stage. So we as a whole had become less of that. At that moment I quickly started sparring with Richard Plugge (team CEO, ed.)," Zeeman shares. "And we found that after all these years we had become so close as a team that this was no longer possible.” It was absolute domination, but within the team there was obvious tension. Ultimately, the talks after the stage had a common decision taken, and that was to protect Kuss' place in the GC and support him to victory. A very popular results for the American, who was widely celebrated to take what was one of the most surprising Grand Tour wins of the last decade.
Read also
The lack of leadership, present and future, led Primoz Roglic to leave the team, but ultimately Zeeman tells the story of a fruitful set of conversations following that day. “I later talked about this one-on-one with Primoz, and then raised it in the group. Then we had an intense but beautiful conversation with each other, in which everyone agreed on one thing: we do not attack each other. We should not compete against each other, but against our opponent who is in fourth place. We have to ensure that we remain one, two and three and we will defend that.”
“That was a very special moment for Richard and me. To experience, in such an extreme situation, how everyone was so aware of our culture and philosophy. During the conversations in recent weeks towards the new season, I have noticed how more than ever everyone understands that their own ambitions are very important, super important even, but that there is a limit," he concludes. "The team interest always comes before your interest. With us, everyone gets many opportunities, no one is limited in their possibilities, but unconditional support for each other is above all. That is a wonderful lesson I learned in 2023.”
Read also

Rúben SilvaEditor-in-Chief
A founding contributor to CyclingUpToDate since its launch in January 2022, Ruben Silva has played a central role in shaping the site’s editorial direction and long-term growth. Before joining the project, he built his experience through independent blogging at Echelons Hub and by producing race previews for Ciclismo Internacional, developing a strong analytical voice rooted in daily engagement with professional cycling.
Beyond editorial work, he has been closely involved in the expansion and coordination of CyclingUpToDate’s wider network, helping establish and support sister platforms across multiple languages. This includes ongoing collaboration with CiclismoAlDia (Spanish), CiclismoAtual (Portuguese), WielrennenUpToDate (Dutch), and RadsportAktuell (German), contributing to a shared editorial vision and consistent international coverage.
He also helps oversee editorial governance across the network, setting standards for accuracy and consistency and coordinating updates or corrections when needed.
Originally from the Porto metropolitan area in Portugal, he holds a bachelor’s degree in Geography. His path into cycling journalism was shaped not through formal media training, but through independent reporting, community engagement, and sustained on-the-ground involvement in the sport.
Over the course of his career, he has conducted approximately 100 interviews across road cycling and cyclocross, ranging from one-to-one conversations and online formats to press conferences and on-site pre- and post-race coverage. His interviews include leading riders, team managers, and prominent figures within cycling media: Tadej Pogacar, Jonas Vingegaard, Mathieu van der Poel, Primoz Roglic, Wout van Aert, Joao Almeida and Tom Pidcock; managers like Patrick Lefevere and Joxean Matxin; and YouTube personality Bryan Kennedy (BKXC)...
Within 18 months of launch, he helped grow CyclingUpToDate’s English-language platform into one of the most-read cycling news websites, built entirely from the ground up. As both a professional journalist and lifelong cycling enthusiast, his focus remains on delivering accurate, timely, and well-contextualized coverage.
claps 0visitors 0
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- There really was nothing in it. Schreiber was so much faster, and Brand was fighting to stay in the wheel in the sprint. Schreiber did move a bit, but to say she closed the door doesn't make sense because Brand couldn't enter it anyway, abd she wasn't impeded.
Rafionain-Glas08-11-2026 - He should have been allowed to go to Movistar. Right now both arent a good fit for each other and are just wasting each other's time and effortabstractengineer08-11-2026
- Thibau Nys does exactly what Iserbyt is calling for
Rafionain-Glas08-11-2026 - i did not see it. was the relegation justified or an overly hard decision? and don‘t cross riders deviate from straight lines all the time? bumping into each others when they cut corners, etc … why being more strict with the rules on the finish sprint?Ketterechts08-11-2026
- seems like we are advertising the website with pointless comments…Ketterechts08-11-2026
- So?Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- The UCI do have their favorites.
Front24208-11-2026 - On a positive note, you maybe notice turning this topic into a discussion has the benefit of eliminating certain participants who do not see how they can turn it back to their sole interest ;-)Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- People see what they want to. I am actually the opposite of your accusation, probably more of a rebel than most of you who don’t get the big picture. The difference is, I don’t go moaning publicly about the consequences of my transgressions, I understand the need for rules and I take my OWN responsibility when deciding to ignore or break them or doing so involuntarily. I will also not hesitate to state my case or argue vehemently when relevant, sometimes it works, sometimes it makes things worse but that’s the price to pay for principles and having character.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- That may be but that was unknown to others and nothing says that’s the whole truth. Again, don’t try to misinterpret, it is a call and technically it is correct. Besides, even if there is a valid reason, that does not disqualify the ruling or punishment as far as the rules have been developed. I don’t think they’re as far as in football where for handball there is a distinction (in some ways and specific cases) between intentional or not. And football can be just as harsh and people live with it, eg the offside rule, also judged to within tiny fractions but often wrong or ignored. It’s the nature of every collective organisation and sometimes I wonder if our rebellion against it isn’t seated in the feelings we carry from the injustices we’ve felt personally, like being flashed driving 1km/h too fast when we are explained limits are just a security measure but we are absolutely certain not to have endangered anyone with our transgression. The problem is, nobody has better solutions and no 2 people have the same interpretation of where a limit should be.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
Loading
Fan Peloton social ride! 🚴 📆 Woensdag 13 december 18.00 CET. Bij deelname ontvang je automatisch een uniek Team Jumbo-Visma wielershirt in @GoZwift! 😎 Meer weten? Lees dan snel verder!
1 Comments









