“I don’t think you can compare those situations” – Visma boss Richard Plugge pushes back against burnout claims after a series of high-profile exits

Burnout has become one of the loudest words in cycling’s early 2026 conversation, and Team Visma | Lease a Bike has increasingly found itself at the centre of it.

Following the shock retirement of Simon Yates, the earlier career pause of Fem van Empel, and the long shadow of Tom Dumoulin stepping away from the sport, questions have mounted over whether the team’s high-performance model comes at too great a mental cost.

Now, team boss Richard Plugge has offered a direct response.

“I don’t think you can compare the situations of Fem van Empel, Tom Dumoulin and Simon Yates with each other,” Plugge said in conversation with Wieler Revue. With that, he rejected the growing tendency to group the cases together under a single burnout narrative.

The retirement of Yates at the start of January was the spark that reignited the discussion. A reigning Grand Tour contender walking away with a year left on his contract created immediate scrutiny. His twin brother Adam later revealed the decision had been discussed privately for some time, but externally it appeared abrupt.

Van Empel’s earlier loss of motivation and career pause had already prompted concern, while Dumoulin’s very public struggle with pressure in previous seasons remains one of the most high-profile examples of mental fatigue in modern cycling.

For critics, the pattern seemed uncomfortable. Visma’s reputation as the most detail-driven, data-optimised team in the sport made it an obvious focal point for the wider burnout debate.

Plugge, however, urged nuance. “But we are certainly thinking about the phenomenon of burnout in cycling,” he added, acknowledging the seriousness of the topic while distancing the team from simplified conclusions.

Rather than dismissing the issue, Plugge pointed to structural measures the team has implemented for years in an effort to safeguard mental balance.

“I think we were the first team that allowed family to join riders on altitude camps,” he explained. The move, unusual when first introduced, was designed to soften the isolating effect of extended high-altitude training blocks and maintain emotional stability away from racing.

That approach, Plugge argued, reflects a philosophy that extends beyond training plans and marginal gains. “We certainly pay attention to that, and it works,” he said, framing wellbeing as integral rather than peripheral to performance.

The team has previously demonstrated flexibility when boundaries are reached. Jonas Vingegaard, often viewed as the embodiment of Visma’s meticulous structure, signalled internally last season that elements of his programme were becoming overwhelming. Rather than pushing through, adjustments were made.

Such examples are central to Plugge’s defence: the pursuit of success, he implies, is not pursued blindly.

The broader context cannot be ignored. Performance demands across the WorldTour continue to intensify, monitoring grows more constant, and expectations expand year on year. Even riders outside the Visma environment have acknowledged how difficult it has become to sustain peak-level motivation across multiple seasons.

In that climate, high-profile exits inevitably draw connections, whether warranted or not. The departure of long-time coach Tim Heemskerk earlier this winter, while different in nature, further fuelled speculation of internal strain within one of cycling’s most scrutinised organisations.

Plugge’s message, however, is clear: the situations are individual, not systemic, and cannot simply be bundled together.

Whether that distinction holds in the court of public opinion remains to be seen. For now, as the peloton grapples with the reality of elite sport’s mental toll, Visma’s leadership has made it known that it sees complexity, not crisis, behind the headlines.