“I don’t think you can compare those situations” – Visma boss Richard Plugge pushes back against burnout claims after a series of high-profile exits
Cycling
Burnout has become one of the loudest words in cycling’s early 2026 conversation, and Team Visma | Lease a Bike has increasingly found itself at the centre of it.
Following the shock retirement of Simon Yates, the earlier career pause of Fem van Empel, and the long shadow of Tom Dumoulin stepping away from the sport, questions have mounted over whether the team’s high-performance model comes at too great a mental cost.
Now, team boss Richard Plugge has offered a direct response.
“I don’t think you can compare the situations of Fem van Empel, Tom Dumoulin and Simon Yates with each other,” Plugge said in conversation with Wieler Revue. With that, he rejected the growing tendency to group the cases together under a single burnout narrative.
One debate, very different circumstances
The retirement of Yates at the start of January was the spark that reignited the discussion. A reigning Grand Tour contender walking away with a year left on his contract created immediate scrutiny. His twin brother Adam later revealed the decision had been discussed privately for some time, but externally it appeared abrupt.
Van Empel’s earlier loss of motivation and career pause had already prompted concern, while Dumoulin’s very public struggle with pressure in previous seasons remains one of the most high-profile examples of mental fatigue in modern cycling.
For critics, the pattern seemed uncomfortable. Visma’s reputation as the most detail-driven, data-optimised team in the sport made it an obvious focal point for the wider burnout debate.
Plugge, however, urged nuance. “But we are certainly thinking about the phenomenon of burnout in cycling,” he added, acknowledging the seriousness of the topic while distancing the team from simplified conclusions.
A proactive approach, not denial
Rather than dismissing the issue, Plugge pointed to structural measures the team has implemented for years in an effort to safeguard mental balance.
“I think we were the first team that allowed family to join riders on altitude camps,” he explained. The move, unusual when first introduced, was designed to soften the isolating effect of extended high-altitude training blocks and maintain emotional stability away from racing.
That approach, Plugge argued, reflects a philosophy that extends beyond training plans and marginal gains. “We certainly pay attention to that, and it works,” he said, framing wellbeing as integral rather than peripheral to performance.
The team has previously demonstrated flexibility when boundaries are reached. Jonas Vingegaard, often viewed as the embodiment of Visma’s meticulous structure, signalled internally last season that elements of his programme were becoming overwhelming. Rather than pushing through, adjustments were made.
Such examples are central to Plugge’s defence: the pursuit of success, he implies, is not pursued blindly.
Pressure in modern cycling
The broader context cannot be ignored. Performance demands across the WorldTour continue to intensify, monitoring grows more constant, and expectations expand year on year. Even riders outside the Visma environment have acknowledged how difficult it has become to sustain peak-level motivation across multiple seasons.
In that climate, high-profile exits inevitably draw connections, whether warranted or not. The departure of long-time coach Tim Heemskerk earlier this winter, while different in nature, further fuelled speculation of internal strain within one of cycling’s most scrutinised organisations.
Plugge’s message, however, is clear: the situations are individual, not systemic, and cannot simply be bundled together.
Whether that distinction holds in the court of public opinion remains to be seen. For now, as the peloton grapples with the reality of elite sport’s mental toll, Visma’s leadership has made it known that it sees complexity, not crisis, behind the headlines.
Kieran WoodDeputy Editor-in-Chief
Kieran Wood is a sports journalist based in Wales and has been active in journalism since 2022. He regularly contributes to DartsNews.com and CyclingUpToDate.com, where he covers professional cycling and darts. In cycling, his work includes liveblogs from major races, including the Tour de France, the Giro d’Italia, and La Vuelta a España, alongside race reports and analysis. He has also conducted interviews with professional riders.
His reporting spans the full racing calendar, from one-day classics to stage races, with a focus on accurate, real-time coverage and clear contextual analysis. For statistics, results, and historical context, he regularly uses resources such as ProCyclingStats. To support reporting on rider activity and training context where relevant, he also references Strava.
In his work, Kieran places strong emphasis on careful sourcing, editorial accuracy, and updating articles as new, verified information becomes available.
claps 0visitors 0
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- so what i understand is: i left a comment calling out the endless author CVs for being an unnecessary flex of expertise, and you responded by lecturing me (and others) on discrimination and value systems. hats off to you. you definitely lost me!Ketterechts09-11-2026
- I just love the flood of Americans into the top ranks of world cycling. In addition to being studs on the bike, they all seem to be excellent emissaries for our country.Occam09-11-2026
- ANATOMY OF A G.O.A.T. EDDY MERCKX about TADEJ POGAČAR: Merckx: “He has revived a style of cycling that we had almost forgotten. He is now better than me.” Key statements by Merckx about Pogačar in 2026: - Acknowledging his superiority: This time, Merckx openly admitted, without any subsequent backtracking or reservations, that Pogačar had surpassed him and was now above him. This contrasts with 2024, when he quickly softened his remarks about Pogačar being faster. - The possibility of a historic triple (Giro, Tour and Vuelta): During the July Tour de France (where Pogi claimed his fifth title), Merckx stated that Pogi was the only cyclist in history capable of winning all three Grand Tours (the Giro d'Italia, Tour de France and Vuelta a España) in a single season, provided the conditions were right and he had sufficient team support. - Lack of serious competition: Merckx emphasised that Pogačar has no real rivals in the mountains since 2024, thanks to his extraordinary climbing ability and the fact that he continues to improve despite still being under 28 (he turned 28 in autumn 2026). - Praise for his racing style: Merckx highlighted how Pogačar is bringing back the aggressive, uncompromising spirit of cycling's golden era, when races were not merely about calculated stages and tactical conservatism, but about attacking from long distances. PS: This is not "boring" ... this is called making real history, not only statistical history. Capish?PogiSloFans09-11-2026
- It’s off-season mate, I’m bored and fed up with the mediocrity of people unwilling to provoke change when they admit things aren’t right. What have you done lately to make anyone realise you won’t put up with things? What conversation, are you dictating to me which part of the incident I have to be interested in or telling me other parts are taboo? That’s what I guess the UCI would really like, let them moan, let it blow over for them pass on to the next thing, let’s keep the status quo, let’s try our best not reviewing or revealing anything about decision-making just like every time before, they’re used to it by now so we can take the risk they’ll never give us grief.Jumpyjohn09-11-2026
- As far as CUTD headlines go this is far from the worst. It helps if you look at it twice and realise it’s a list of descriptions from distinct events. You can’t deny the reality of being a rival if you consider the picture immediately below, frontrunner is unfortunate but I’m guessing this time it’s more a linguistic failure than a clickbaiting opportunity. Just a reminder that this is not an anglo website, for those who find it too tedious to interpret text to get the gist of things which are rarely of great importance (as opposed to eg purposely biaised DOJ extradition translations in order to achieve hidden agendas), there are plenty of anglo cycling websites google can suggest.Jumpyjohn09-11-2026
- Ah, finally someone willing to be a bit proactive.Jumpyjohn09-11-2026
- So? Do you understand the way instructions, decisions and authority work? Do you think in a football match if after a match (or even after play has gone on) a player tells the referee he did touch the ball with his hands when the referee didn’t award opponents a penalty that they will revise the score or force a replay? You really don’t get my point, it’s not against the rider but everyone here is so emotional for her they can’t get back to an issue which needs resolving for the future and the first step (or maybe second) is to try to understand how and why it happens, none of you have contributed in the least to that. All everyone is interested in is letting everyone know they agree how unjust it was, not even sure anyone thinks that could affect anything.Jumpyjohn09-11-2026
- Shouldn’t you be in MOUrning?Jumpyjohn09-11-2026
- Maybe you don’t like it and that’s fine, we all have different sensibilities and topics that touch us, but as you try to show me, it doesn’t hurt to reflect and compare ourselves to others behaving similarly. What precisely is the difference between a sports fan interested in every detail of his/her hero’s life and a celeb fan having the same hobby? It’s far more interesting to learn and think about how and why (which) people do things than reading about what they are actually doing. And just to add another level, maybe you’ll agree we don’t use the same value system for everyone, we discriminate in an enormous number of systematic ways. For example, when is the last time you saw a discussion arguing about the achievements of two politicians to compare or for that matter two business leaders apart from the comparison of hypothetical wealth accumulated? Perhaps you misunderstood the intention?Jumpyjohn09-11-2026
- I don’t think I know what’s beneath the surface but I am willing to think about it, discuss it, compare it to a known past, extrapolate to a potential future and ask/try to find out truth or even take action within my powers (boycotting something or someone is within EVERY person’s reach). If you think your attitude has more chance of changing a result, a process, a system or an institution or it just makes you feel good, keep at it but to me it looks like you’ve already given up before trying.Jumpyjohn09-11-2026
Loading
Write a comment