“There is no place for a growing ego at Visma” – Ex-pro sees clear reason for exit of Jonas Vingegaard’s long-time coach
Cycling
When Tim Heemskerk walked away from Team Visma | Lease a Bike earlier this winter, the reaction across the peloton was immediate and uneasy. The coach most closely associated with Jonas Vingegaard’s rise from raw talent to double Tour de France winner was suddenly gone, with little public explanation beyond vague references to creativity and direction.
For former pro Thomas Dekker, the reasoning is far more straightforward.
Speaking on the Live Slow Ride Fast podcast, Dekker framed Heemskerk’s departure not as a crisis, but as a predictable consequence of how Visma’s system is built.
“There is no place for a growing ego at Visma,” Dekker said, pointing directly at the team’s long-standing internal philosophy.
A system built to outlast individuals
Dekker’s central argument is that Visma’s success has always been rooted in structure rather than personalities, no matter how influential those personalities become.
“Heemskerk arrived in 2019 basically as a nobody,” Dekker explained. “But through his success with Jonas, he very quickly became the trainer. And that’s exactly where it can start to clash with how Visma works.”
The Dutch team’s internal mantra of together winning has been repeated for years, but Dekker suggested it carries real consequences when individual profiles begin to overshadow the collective.
“Visma wants the team to be bigger than any individual,” he said. “If an ego grows beyond that, then it no longer fits the system.”
That assessment aligns closely with the broader context of Heemskerk’s exit. After eight years with the organisation, the performance coach acknowledged struggling to maintain creative freedom within Visma’s increasingly centralised performance framework. His responsibilities were swiftly redistributed internally, including those relating to Vingegaard.
Vingegaard not immune to the system
Dekker was careful not to frame the situation as personal conflict, but he did suggest that Vingegaard’s closeness to Heemskerk may itself have become part of the problem.
Podcast co-host Laurens ten Dam expanded on that dynamic. “Jonas probably leaned too much towards Heemskerk,” Ten Dam said. “That meant other trainers had less influence, and that simply doesn’t fit with how Visma wants to operate.”
The implication is subtle but important. At Visma, even a two-time Tour de France winner does not get to reshape the coaching hierarchy around himself. The system remains non-negotiable.
Success as the source of tension
Dekker also pushed back strongly against the idea that Heemskerk’s exit signals instability inside the team. On the contrary, he argued that Visma’s recent dominance is precisely what creates these moments of friction.
“Without this system, Vingegaard never wins the Tour twice,” Dekker said. “People forget that Visma won two Grand Tours just last season.”
Criticism around altitude camps, rigid planning, and centralised control, he argued, is often overstated.
“You hear people say riders are forced into altitude camps,” Dekker added. “But that’s the case at every top team now. And there is more flexibility than people think. Wout van Aert, for example, has always been able to live in Belgium. There is room for individual needs.”
A team choosing continuity over comfort
Seen through that lens, Heemskerk’s departure fits a wider pattern rather than standing apart from it. Visma have consistently prioritised long-term continuity over short-term comfort, even when that means losing highly influential figures.
The message, as Dekker frames it, is uncompromising: no matter how central someone becomes to success, the system always comes first.
In a season already shaped by Simon Yates’ sudden retirement, coaching changes, and renewed scrutiny of Visma’s methods, Heemskerk’s exit has inevitably fed external narratives of unrest. Inside the team, however, the logic appears far colder and more deliberate.
At Visma, success is not owned by individuals, and when that balance shifts, the response is swift.
Kieran WoodDeputy Editor-in-Chief
Kieran Wood is a sports journalist based in Wales and has been active in journalism since 2022. He regularly contributes to DartsNews.com and CyclingUpToDate.com, where he covers professional cycling and darts. In cycling, his work includes liveblogs from major races, including the Tour de France, the Giro d’Italia, and La Vuelta a España, alongside race reports and analysis. He has also conducted interviews with professional riders.
His reporting spans the full racing calendar, from one-day classics to stage races, with a focus on accurate, real-time coverage and clear contextual analysis. For statistics, results, and historical context, he regularly uses resources such as ProCyclingStats. To support reporting on rider activity and training context where relevant, he also references Strava.
In his work, Kieran places strong emphasis on careful sourcing, editorial accuracy, and updating articles as new, verified information becomes available.
claps 2visitors 2
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- I just love the flood of Americans into the top ranks of world cycling. In addition to being studs on the bike, they all seem to be excellent emissaries for our country.Occam09-11-2026
- ANATOMY OF A G.O.A.T. EDDY MERCKX about TADEJ POGAČAR: Merckx: “He has revived a style of cycling that we had almost forgotten. He is now better than me.” Key statements by Merckx about Pogačar in 2026: - Acknowledging his superiority: This time, Merckx openly admitted, without any subsequent backtracking or reservations, that Pogačar had surpassed him and was now above him. This contrasts with 2024, when he quickly softened his remarks about Pogačar being faster. - The possibility of a historic triple (Giro, Tour and Vuelta): During the July Tour de France (where Pogi claimed his fifth title), Merckx stated that Pogi was the only cyclist in history capable of winning all three Grand Tours (the Giro d'Italia, Tour de France and Vuelta a España) in a single season, provided the conditions were right and he had sufficient team support. - Lack of serious competition: Merckx emphasised that Pogačar has no real rivals in the mountains since 2024, thanks to his extraordinary climbing ability and the fact that he continues to improve despite still being under 28 (he turned 28 in autumn 2026). - Praise for his racing style: Merckx highlighted how Pogačar is bringing back the aggressive, uncompromising spirit of cycling's golden era, when races were not merely about calculated stages and tactical conservatism, but about attacking from long distances. PS: This is not "boring" ... this is called making real history, not only statistical history. Capish?PogiSloFans09-11-2026
- It’s off-season mate, I’m bored and fed up with the mediocrity of people unwilling to provoke change when they admit things aren’t right. What have you done lately to make anyone realise you won’t put up with things? What conversation, are you dictating to me which part of the incident I have to be interested in or telling me other parts are taboo? That’s what I guess the UCI would really like, let them moan, let it blow over for them pass on to the next thing, let’s keep the status quo, let’s try our best not reviewing or revealing anything about decision-making just like every time before, they’re used to it by now so we can take the risk they’ll never give us grief.Jumpyjohn09-11-2026
- As far as CUTD headlines go this is far from the worst. It helps if you look at it twice and realise it’s a list of descriptions from distinct events. You can’t deny the reality of being a rival if you consider the picture immediately below, frontrunner is unfortunate but I’m guessing this time it’s more a linguistic failure than a clickbaiting opportunity. Just a reminder that this is not an anglo website, for those who find it too tedious to interpret text to get the gist of things which are rarely of great importance (as opposed to eg purposely biaised DOJ extradition translations in order to achieve hidden agendas), there are plenty of anglo cycling websites google can suggest.Jumpyjohn09-11-2026
- Ah, finally someone willing to be a bit proactive.Jumpyjohn09-11-2026
- So? Do you understand the way instructions, decisions and authority work? Do you think in a football match if after a match (or even after play has gone on) a player tells the referee he did touch the ball with his hands when the referee didn’t award opponents a penalty that they will revise the score or force a replay? You really don’t get my point, it’s not against the rider but everyone here is so emotional for her they can’t get back to an issue which needs resolving for the future and the first step (or maybe second) is to try to understand how and why it happens, none of you have contributed in the least to that. All everyone is interested in is letting everyone know they agree how unjust it was, not even sure anyone thinks that could affect anything.Jumpyjohn09-11-2026
- Shouldn’t you be in MOUrning?Jumpyjohn09-11-2026
- Maybe you don’t like it and that’s fine, we all have different sensibilities and topics that touch us, but as you try to show me, it doesn’t hurt to reflect and compare ourselves to others behaving similarly. What precisely is the difference between a sports fan interested in every detail of his/her hero’s life and a celeb fan having the same hobby? It’s far more interesting to learn and think about how and why (which) people do things than reading about what they are actually doing. And just to add another level, maybe you’ll agree we don’t use the same value system for everyone, we discriminate in an enormous number of systematic ways. For example, when is the last time you saw a discussion arguing about the achievements of two politicians to compare or for that matter two business leaders apart from the comparison of hypothetical wealth accumulated? Perhaps you misunderstood the intention?Jumpyjohn09-11-2026
- I don’t think I know what’s beneath the surface but I am willing to think about it, discuss it, compare it to a known past, extrapolate to a potential future and ask/try to find out truth or even take action within my powers (boycotting something or someone is within EVERY person’s reach). If you think your attitude has more chance of changing a result, a process, a system or an institution or it just makes you feel good, keep at it but to me it looks like you’ve already given up before trying.Jumpyjohn09-11-2026
- All journalists should start asking the UCI uncomfortable questions, sending inquiries about the interpretation of the rules and the justification of the results. This is the only way to change anything.averagecyclist09-11-2026
Loading
4 Comments