“There is no place for a growing ego at Visma” – Ex-pro sees clear reason for exit of Jonas Vingegaard’s long-time coach

When Tim Heemskerk walked away from Team Visma | Lease a Bike earlier this winter, the reaction across the peloton was immediate and uneasy. The coach most closely associated with Jonas Vingegaard’s rise from raw talent to double Tour de France winner was suddenly gone, with little public explanation beyond vague references to creativity and direction.

For former pro Thomas Dekker, the reasoning is far more straightforward.

Speaking on the Live Slow Ride Fast podcast, Dekker framed Heemskerk’s departure not as a crisis, but as a predictable consequence of how Visma’s system is built.

“There is no place for a growing ego at Visma,” Dekker said, pointing directly at the team’s long-standing internal philosophy.

Dekker’s central argument is that Visma’s success has always been rooted in structure rather than personalities, no matter how influential those personalities become.

“Heemskerk arrived in 2019 basically as a nobody,” Dekker explained. “But through his success with Jonas, he very quickly became the trainer. And that’s exactly where it can start to clash with how Visma works.”

The Dutch team’s internal mantra of together winning has been repeated for years, but Dekker suggested it carries real consequences when individual profiles begin to overshadow the collective.

“Visma wants the team to be bigger than any individual,” he said. “If an ego grows beyond that, then it no longer fits the system.”

That assessment aligns closely with the broader context of Heemskerk’s exit. After eight years with the organisation, the performance coach acknowledged struggling to maintain creative freedom within Visma’s increasingly centralised performance framework. His responsibilities were swiftly redistributed internally, including those relating to Vingegaard.

Dekker was careful not to frame the situation as personal conflict, but he did suggest that Vingegaard’s closeness to Heemskerk may itself have become part of the problem.

Podcast co-host Laurens ten Dam expanded on that dynamic. “Jonas probably leaned too much towards Heemskerk,” Ten Dam said. “That meant other trainers had less influence, and that simply doesn’t fit with how Visma wants to operate.”

The implication is subtle but important. At Visma, even a two-time Tour de France winner does not get to reshape the coaching hierarchy around himself. The system remains non-negotiable.

Dekker also pushed back strongly against the idea that Heemskerk’s exit signals instability inside the team. On the contrary, he argued that Visma’s recent dominance is precisely what creates these moments of friction.

“Without this system, Vingegaard never wins the Tour twice,” Dekker said. “People forget that Visma won two Grand Tours just last season.”

Criticism around altitude camps, rigid planning, and centralised control, he argued, is often overstated.

“You hear people say riders are forced into altitude camps,” Dekker added. “But that’s the case at every top team now. And there is more flexibility than people think. Wout van Aert, for example, has always been able to live in Belgium. There is room for individual needs.”

Seen through that lens, Heemskerk’s departure fits a wider pattern rather than standing apart from it. Visma have consistently prioritised long-term continuity over short-term comfort, even when that means losing highly influential figures.

The message, as Dekker frames it, is uncompromising: no matter how central someone becomes to success, the system always comes first.

In a season already shaped by Simon Yates’ sudden retirement, coaching changes, and renewed scrutiny of Visma’s methods, Heemskerk’s exit has inevitably fed external narratives of unrest. Inside the team, however, the logic appears far colder and more deliberate.

At Visma, success is not owned by individuals, and when that balance shifts, the response is swift.