Giro d'Italia 2026 stage 21 preview, profiles, favourites & predictions - Rome finale sees the sprinters go head to head one final time
Cycling
The 2026 Giro d'Italia will take place from the 8th to the 31st of May. It is the first Grand Tour of the season, and there are 21 stages that will take the riders through many of Italy's iconic cities, the mythical Alps, and many treacherous stages - each one can end the climber's chances of winning. We preview stage 21, which is expected to start and finish at 15:00 and 18:30CET.
Profile Stage 21: Rome - Rome

Stage 21: Rome - Rome, 133 kilometers
The race finishes off once again in Rome, with a stage that is suited to the sprinters and will be featuring a circuit around the Italian capital to wrap off the three-week race. Rome hosts the finale of the Giro d'Italia where Jonas Vingegaard will be crowned overall winner.
The stage will start in the capital, move out of it, and then return for a final circuit that will see the riders go through some of its most iconic monuments. There is going to be an intermediate sprint by the Colosseum; whilst the sprint finish will take place next to the Circo Massimo.
Read also

Stage 21 Finale
The Favourites
I don't think there will be any serious attacks or threats to a bunch sprint and we will ultimately have the sprinters fight for victory unmatched here. However who will do it is a question as important as any other.
Paul Magnier has been the dominating figure of this year's Giro and the only rider to win a regular bunch sprint. But that doesn't mean he is a sprinter above his rivals and that he will repeat it here.
In a flat bunch sprint there will be lots of variables and we will have Jonathan Milan looking to save his race; and the same can be said of both Dylan Groenewegen and Tobias Lund Andresen.
Any one of these three riders could've been the dominating sprint figure at the Giro if we look at their spring results, but it hasn't clicked for any. Pressure will be high, they will take risks, and they have legitimate quality.
Elsewhere it will be hard to find a winner but riders who can finish high do exist with certainty. Ben Turner or Filippo Ganna for INEOS; Madis MIhkels, Paul Penhoët, Orluis Aular, Toon Aerts, Matteo Malucelli, Jensen Plowright, Giovanni Lonardi and Casper van Uden are all men to consider.
Read also
Prediction Giro d'Italia 2026 stage 21:
*** Paul Magnier, Jonathan Milan, Dylan Groenewegen
** Tobias Lund Andresen
* Matteo Malucelli, Ben Turner, Jensen Plowright, Casper van Uden, Madis Mihkels, Luca Mozzato, Orluis Aular, Paul Penhoët, Toon Aerts
Pick: Dylan Groenewegen
How: Regular bunch sprint.
Original: Rúben Silva

Rúben SilvaEditor-in-Chief
A founding contributor to CyclingUpToDate since its launch in January 2022, Ruben Silva has played a central role in shaping the site’s editorial direction and long-term growth. Before joining the project, he built his experience through independent blogging at Echelons Hub and by producing race previews for Ciclismo Internacional, developing a strong analytical voice rooted in daily engagement with professional cycling.
Beyond editorial work, he has been closely involved in the expansion and coordination of CyclingUpToDate’s wider network, helping establish and support sister platforms across multiple languages. This includes ongoing collaboration with CiclismoAlDia (Spanish), CiclismoAtual (Portuguese), WielrennenUpToDate (Dutch), and RadsportAktuell (German), contributing to a shared editorial vision and consistent international coverage.
He also helps oversee editorial governance across the network, setting standards for accuracy and consistency and coordinating updates or corrections when needed.
Originally from the Porto metropolitan area in Portugal, he holds a bachelor’s degree in Geography. His path into cycling journalism was shaped not through formal media training, but through independent reporting, community engagement, and sustained on-the-ground involvement in the sport.
Over the course of his career, he has conducted approximately 100 interviews across road cycling and cyclocross, ranging from one-to-one conversations and online formats to press conferences and on-site pre- and post-race coverage. His interviews include leading riders, team managers, and prominent figures within cycling media: Tadej Pogacar, Jonas Vingegaard, Mathieu van der Poel, Primoz Roglic, Wout van Aert, Joao Almeida and Tom Pidcock; managers like Patrick Lefevere and Joxean Matxin; and YouTube personality Bryan Kennedy (BKXC)...
Within 18 months of launch, he helped grow CyclingUpToDate’s English-language platform into one of the most-read cycling news websites, built entirely from the ground up. As both a professional journalist and lifelong cycling enthusiast, his focus remains on delivering accurate, timely, and well-contextualized coverage.
claps 3visitors 3
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- Thibau Nys does exactly what Iserbyt is calling for
Rafionain-Glas08-11-2026 - i did not see it. was the relegation justified or an overly hard decision? and don‘t cross riders deviate from straight lines all the time? bumping into each others when they cut corners, etc … why being more strict with the rules on the finish sprint?Ketterechts08-11-2026
- seems like we are advertising the website with pointless comments…Ketterechts08-11-2026
- So?Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- The UCI do have their favorites.
Front24208-11-2026 - On a positive note, you maybe notice turning this topic into a discussion has the benefit of eliminating certain participants who do not see how they can turn it back to their sole interest ;-)Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- People see what they want to. I am actually the opposite of your accusation, probably more of a rebel than most of you who don’t get the big picture. The difference is, I don’t go moaning publicly about the consequences of my transgressions, I understand the need for rules and I take my OWN responsibility when deciding to ignore or break them or doing so involuntarily. I will also not hesitate to state my case or argue vehemently when relevant, sometimes it works, sometimes it makes things worse but that’s the price to pay for principles and having character.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- That may be but that was unknown to others and nothing says that’s the whole truth. Again, don’t try to misinterpret, it is a call and technically it is correct. Besides, even if there is a valid reason, that does not disqualify the ruling or punishment as far as the rules have been developed. I don’t think they’re as far as in football where for handball there is a distinction (in some ways and specific cases) between intentional or not. And football can be just as harsh and people live with it, eg the offside rule, also judged to within tiny fractions but often wrong or ignored. It’s the nature of every collective organisation and sometimes I wonder if our rebellion against it isn’t seated in the feelings we carry from the injustices we’ve felt personally, like being flashed driving 1km/h too fast when we are explained limits are just a security measure but we are absolutely certain not to have endangered anyone with our transgression. The problem is, nobody has better solutions and no 2 people have the same interpretation of where a limit should be.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- Because for you deviated implies the other rider MUST have been made to fall and fail to finish ??? I don’t know if you ride a bike but next time someone carves you up or drives dangerously close, just hold back from those feelings of changing something, reporting or filming or even complaining. Everyone will just say, hey you’re still here undamaged, doesn’t seem like anyone did anything.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- And we, what are we doing?Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
Loading
Write a comment







