"Every ambulance following the race had to take riders to hospital" - Tour de Pologne race director explains neutralisation following 'serious' crash
Cycling
A major crash during Stage Three of the 2025 Tour de Pologne forced organisers to neutralise the race with just over 15 kilometres remaining, after multiple riders — including general classification leader Paul Lapeira — were involved in a high-speed pile-up on a technical descent.
Speaking at the finish, race director Czesław Lang defended the decision to temporarily halt the race and explained the severity of the incident, which left organisers with no choice but to intervene.
“It was a crash, like we’ve seen many times before — that’s what happened,” Lang said. “I don’t know the exact dynamics or why they went off the road, but it was so serious that every ambulance following the race had to take riders to hospital."
As such, this lack of medical cover forced Lang into the decision of neutralisation. "The peloton would have been left without medical support for the final 15 kilometres," he explains. "We had to stop the race until more ambulances arrived.”
Read also
The crash occurred with around 25 kilometres to go, just as the day’s breakaway began to splinter and the peloton accelerated on a narrow, twisting descent. Kelland O’Brien (Team Jayco AlUla) had just launched a solo move off the front when a crash in the bunch sent several riders — including Lapeira, Mathias Vacek, and Polish national champion Rafal Majka — off the road and into a roadside ditch.
Lapeira and Majka both remounted and finished the stage, though visibly shaken. Vacek was less fortunate, abandoning the race after sustaining injuries that required stitches to his lip and showed signs of concussion.
After halting the front group, Lang neutralised the race for approximately 15 minutes while medical cover was restored. The time gaps for the general classification were also neutralised, meaning that while the stage win was still contested, the overall standings remained unchanged. “We neutralised the time, but still allowed the riders to sprint for the stage,” Lang clarified. “We couldn’t risk continuing without medical support. Rider safety is the priority.”
Despite the chaotic circumstances, the stage concluded with a bunch sprint, where Ben Turner (INEOS Grenadiers) claimed victory ahead of Pello Bilbao and Andrea Bagioli. The GC picture, however, remained effectively frozen, with Lapeira retaining the leader’s jersey—albeit after a harrowing afternoon.
Read also
Caída importante en la tercera etapa del @Tour_De_Pologne, con el líder Paul Lapeira, Rafal Majka y Antonio Tiberi implicados
— Eurosport.es (@Eurosport_ES) August 6, 2025
El tramo final, en #E1 y @StreamMaxES pic.twitter.com/n2DYOubnGi

Kieran WoodDeputy Editor-in-Chief
Kieran Wood is a sports journalist based in Wales and has been active in journalism since 2022. He regularly contributes to DartsNews.com and CyclingUpToDate.com, where he covers professional cycling and darts. In cycling, his work includes liveblogs from major races, including the Tour de France, the Giro d’Italia, and La Vuelta a España, alongside race reports and analysis. He has also conducted interviews with professional riders.
His reporting spans the full racing calendar, from one-day classics to stage races, with a focus on accurate, real-time coverage and clear contextual analysis. For statistics, results, and historical context, he regularly uses resources such as ProCyclingStats. To support reporting on rider activity and training context where relevant, he also references Strava.
In his work, Kieran places strong emphasis on careful sourcing, editorial accuracy, and updating articles as new, verified information becomes available.
claps 0visitors 0
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- He should have been allowed to go to Movistar. Right now both arent a good fit for each other and are just wasting each other's time and effortabstractengineer08-11-2026
- Thibau Nys does exactly what Iserbyt is calling for
Rafionain-Glas08-11-2026 - i did not see it. was the relegation justified or an overly hard decision? and don‘t cross riders deviate from straight lines all the time? bumping into each others when they cut corners, etc … why being more strict with the rules on the finish sprint?Ketterechts08-11-2026
- seems like we are advertising the website with pointless comments…Ketterechts08-11-2026
- So?Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- The UCI do have their favorites.
Front24208-11-2026 - On a positive note, you maybe notice turning this topic into a discussion has the benefit of eliminating certain participants who do not see how they can turn it back to their sole interest ;-)Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- People see what they want to. I am actually the opposite of your accusation, probably more of a rebel than most of you who don’t get the big picture. The difference is, I don’t go moaning publicly about the consequences of my transgressions, I understand the need for rules and I take my OWN responsibility when deciding to ignore or break them or doing so involuntarily. I will also not hesitate to state my case or argue vehemently when relevant, sometimes it works, sometimes it makes things worse but that’s the price to pay for principles and having character.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- That may be but that was unknown to others and nothing says that’s the whole truth. Again, don’t try to misinterpret, it is a call and technically it is correct. Besides, even if there is a valid reason, that does not disqualify the ruling or punishment as far as the rules have been developed. I don’t think they’re as far as in football where for handball there is a distinction (in some ways and specific cases) between intentional or not. And football can be just as harsh and people live with it, eg the offside rule, also judged to within tiny fractions but often wrong or ignored. It’s the nature of every collective organisation and sometimes I wonder if our rebellion against it isn’t seated in the feelings we carry from the injustices we’ve felt personally, like being flashed driving 1km/h too fast when we are explained limits are just a security measure but we are absolutely certain not to have endangered anyone with our transgression. The problem is, nobody has better solutions and no 2 people have the same interpretation of where a limit should be.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- Because for you deviated implies the other rider MUST have been made to fall and fail to finish ??? I don’t know if you ride a bike but next time someone carves you up or drives dangerously close, just hold back from those feelings of changing something, reporting or filming or even complaining. Everyone will just say, hey you’re still here undamaged, doesn’t seem like anyone did anything.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
Loading
2 Comments







