
The antepenultimate stage of the Vuelta a España was essentially flat with an uphill finale, which was a perfect opportunity for the fast men to shine once again after many days of invisibility.
The breakaway was expected to be hard-fought, as today’s stage was the last chance for many riders to be protagonists. However, the outcome was completely the opposite, given that only two riders went clear and distanced from peloton.
The two riders in question were Jakub Otruba and Victor Guernalec, but the French man decided to take the foot off the gas and let Otruba go in a solo adventure. Kilometers passed by with little to no action, until the race arrived to Salamanca with 50km to go.
There, Alpecin and Visma accelerated in hopes of causing echelons. UAE and Almeida were caught off guard, but they managed to solve the situation. In the intermediate sprint, Visma were once again very vigilant and launched Vingegaard, who grabbed 4 bonus seconds and increased his lead over Almeida, while Jorgenson obtained two.
With around 30km to go, two Burgos Burpellet teammates – Mario Aparicio and Sergio Chumil established a second breakaway, but they were quickly caught by the bunch.
A final sprint was the inevitable outcome, and the main favourite was Jasper Philipsen. Alpecin delivered a perfect lead out and the Belgian just had to finish the job, obtaining his third stage victory of this edition. Mads Pedersen and Orluis Aular completed the podium.
Once the stage finished, we asked some of our writers to share their thoughts and main takeaways about what happened today.
Read also
Ivan Silva (CiclismoAtual)
Well, in terms of profile it is the typical not amusing stage which i dislike to see on the grand tours. No difficulties, no mountain passes and no interest in creating a breakaway. With all this being considered, we actually had more to this stage than i initially expected.
We've had crosswinds and an attempt to break the peloton, we've had an intermediate sprint with bonus seconds for the GC guys and a difficult sprint finish with plenty of teams making some desperate pushes to try and go for a stage win that is getting more and more difficult to obtain.
Jasper Philipsen won another bunch sprint, confirming the expected status as the best sprinter of this Vuelta, but that is not saying much given that usually the pure sprinters tend to skip this race. Still he has displayed good capacity of withstanding a slightly uphill approach to the final KM and only in the last meters he was able to obtain optimal position to launch the sprint, so also great team work from Alpecin today.
What i did want to talk about though was that intermediate sprint. It is shockingly amateurish to me that, with only 1 man in the break, Visma was able to take such an easy 4 bonus seconds with Vingegaard with no reaction from UAE whatsoever. UAE was nowhere to be seen on that sprint. Maybe they assumed Pedersen would want to take points for the green jersey? Ok, i'd agree he would but who else would?
It is not like Pedersen has much competition for the points jersey either, apart from... Vingegaard himself. Again, this is a reflection of how lost the whole structure of UAE is on this Vuelta. Vingegaard has 44 seconds over Almeida at this point, 24 of which are obtained via bonus seconds.
Small details that can make the difference between bringing the red jersey home or not. Unfortunatelly, i think it is too late for João Almeida and tomorrow he will be highly marked by Vingegaard who only needs to defend from the portuguese rider.

Jonas Vingegaard grabbed four bonus seconds at the intermediate sprint
Rúben Silva (CyclingUpToDate)
A no-show with a finale that we've already seen a few times, to be honest. The Vuelta has lacked the spectacular stages and finales and today's stage was a good example of that. Despite very few teams having a stage win or a proper result to show for, most did not even try to get in the breakaway today which is absolutely incomprehensible, and a trend that I honestly don't know is still followed in Grand Tours.
We had for the very 1st time echelons risks in the race, although they came to nothing, and a bunch sprint that almost seemed to follow the same script we've seen already several times, with the modest Alpecin leadout ruling over all others because there are simply no other World-Tour level leadout in the race, and Jasper Philipsen delivering the win because he is by far the fastest pure sprinter in the race.
The highlight of the day was Jonas Vingegaard capturing 4 seconds, allowed by the lack of combativity from around a dozen teams, and capitalized fully. Whilst this was known to everyone, UAE did not have a single man towards the front of the peloton to prevent the Dane from gaining free time on João Almeida, which is a rookie mistake at the very highest level.
Sure, 4 seconds are very unlikely to make a difference by the end of Bola del Mundo tomorrow. But try telling Demi Vollering that 4 seconds don't matter...
Read also
Jorge P. Borreguero (CiclismoAlDía)
The truth is that UAE made quite a few mistakes, and they gave away time that could be crucial for Jonas Vingegaard. In a stage where nothing should have happened, the Dane gained 4 seconds and largely offset his losses in the time trial. Every second, with Vingo showing signs of weakness, was worth its weight in gold.
On the other hand, it is worth mentioning how unfair the Vuelta a España is being to Movistar Team. We will analyse this in more depth when the race is over, but Orluis Aular's third place in stage 19 is the eighth blow to the team.
Instead of throwing in the towel before the start due to the absence of Enric Mas, instead of throwing in the towel due to Pablo Castrillo's injury, instead of throwing in the towel due to Javier Romo's injury caused by a pro-Palestinian protester, Movistar Team has never given up, and it is not fair that it will leave the race without any victories.
Read also
Félix Serna (CyclingUpToDate)
Joao Almeida and UAE were probably affected by the boredom of the stage. Because let’s be honest, today’s stage was boring. Very boring and quite disappointing, because I think we were all expecting much more from the riders. So they got too distracted when there were bonus seconds up for grabs.
And that was a mistake, because Vingegaard was paying attention and increased his lead in a very simple way. In normal circumstances, 4 seconds in a Gran Tour should not have much relevance, but race situation is extremely tight between Jonas and Joao, and 4 seconds might actually become decisive.
UAE were caught sleeping not only once but twice. We have long talked about how this would not happen if Pogacar was riding, the team is radically different without him. In an area where echelons were expected to happen, Visma tried their luck and UAE didn’t immediately followed. They were lucky because there were very few riders in the front group and there was an Astana helping them to chase, or else the outcome could have been much different.
Not much can be said about the final sprint. Even if it was uphill, it was not hard enough to rule Phlipsen out, and he just won easily. Mads Pedersen looked very strong, it was his best sprint at the Vuelta so far and he was actually close to beating Jasper, but it was not enough. Some reports suggested he had been sick the past days, and if that is true, I wouldn’t mind getting the same illness.
I cannot understand why other teams do not try something different to either surprise Alpecin or prevent a bunch sprint. I already said some stages ago that the lack of ambition to form a big breakaway makes no sense, and I just reaffirm it today.
Only seven teams have won so far out of 23, which is less than 33%, and they are really running out of time. Today was literally the perfect day to make a strong break to prevent a bunch sprint, as only Alpecin would be interested in chasing, but they are missing two riders. Instead, everyone seemed content with the obvious outcome: small break, final sprint and Phlipsen winning.
And you? What are your thoughts about what happened today? Leave a comment and join the discussion!

Félix SernaCycling Journalist
Félix Serna is a writer at CyclingUpToDate and has been part of the team since 2025. He covers professional cycling across both the men’s and women’s calendars, with a focus on UCI rankings, race developments, and rider performance. His work includes interview-based reports, liveblogs, and tournament coverage designed to provide clear, accurate context throughout the season.
In his reporting, Félix regularly uses ProCyclingStats for results, statistics, and historical reference. He places strong emphasis on careful sourcing, editorial accuracy, and updating articles promptly when new, verified information becomes available. He holds a bachelor’s degree in International Studies.
claps 2visitors 2
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- He should have been allowed to go to Movistar. Right now both arent a good fit for each other and are just wasting each other's time and effortabstractengineer08-11-2026
- Thibau Nys does exactly what Iserbyt is calling for
Rafionain-Glas08-11-2026 - i did not see it. was the relegation justified or an overly hard decision? and don‘t cross riders deviate from straight lines all the time? bumping into each others when they cut corners, etc … why being more strict with the rules on the finish sprint?Ketterechts08-11-2026
- seems like we are advertising the website with pointless comments…Ketterechts08-11-2026
- So?Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- The UCI do have their favorites.
Front24208-11-2026 - On a positive note, you maybe notice turning this topic into a discussion has the benefit of eliminating certain participants who do not see how they can turn it back to their sole interest ;-)Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- People see what they want to. I am actually the opposite of your accusation, probably more of a rebel than most of you who don’t get the big picture. The difference is, I don’t go moaning publicly about the consequences of my transgressions, I understand the need for rules and I take my OWN responsibility when deciding to ignore or break them or doing so involuntarily. I will also not hesitate to state my case or argue vehemently when relevant, sometimes it works, sometimes it makes things worse but that’s the price to pay for principles and having character.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- That may be but that was unknown to others and nothing says that’s the whole truth. Again, don’t try to misinterpret, it is a call and technically it is correct. Besides, even if there is a valid reason, that does not disqualify the ruling or punishment as far as the rules have been developed. I don’t think they’re as far as in football where for handball there is a distinction (in some ways and specific cases) between intentional or not. And football can be just as harsh and people live with it, eg the offside rule, also judged to within tiny fractions but often wrong or ignored. It’s the nature of every collective organisation and sometimes I wonder if our rebellion against it isn’t seated in the feelings we carry from the injustices we’ve felt personally, like being flashed driving 1km/h too fast when we are explained limits are just a security measure but we are absolutely certain not to have endangered anyone with our transgression. The problem is, nobody has better solutions and no 2 people have the same interpretation of where a limit should be.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- Because for you deviated implies the other rider MUST have been made to fall and fail to finish ??? I don’t know if you ride a bike but next time someone carves you up or drives dangerously close, just hold back from those feelings of changing something, reporting or filming or even complaining. Everyone will just say, hey you’re still here undamaged, doesn’t seem like anyone did anything.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
Loading
1 Comments








