
Even as the world has moved back to a state of post-pandemic
"normalcy," COVID-19 continues to be a significant issue for
professional cycling. The 2024 season has once again seen riders struck down by
the virus at critical moments in their racing season, threatening to reshape races and
derail potential victories.
João Almeida, one of the pre-race favourites at the 2024
Vuelta a España, is the latest to suffer from the impact of COVID.
Reports suggested that he tested positive for the virus before a disastrous Stage 8,
where he was dropped on the final climb and subsequently lost valuable time, likely
ending his bid for overall victory. Just this morning, it was confirmed that Almeida has the virus, and has abandoned the race.
This isn’t an isolated incident. COVID-19 has remained a
persistent threat to riders in the peloton, with major stars like Tom Pidcock
and Geraint Thomas affected during the 2024 Tour de France. And in 2023,
reigning world champion Remco Evenepoel was forced to abandon the Giro d’Italia
while leading the race due to a positive COVID test. The question arises: why
does COVID-19 still have such a grip on cycling, even as it seems to have
receded in other sports and much of everyday life? The answer lies in the
unique challenges faced by cyclists, the nature of their sport, and how viruses
spread within the peloton.
A Perfect Breeding Ground
Cycling, more than most sports, creates an environment where
viruses can easily spread. To state the obvious, the dynamics of the peloton, a
large group of riders packed closely together for hours at a time, offer the
ideal conditions for airborne transmission of illnesses like COVID-19. Riders
draft behind one another, sometimes just inches apart, for up to six hours a
day during stage races. This close proximity over long periods makes it
incredibly difficult to avoid virus transmission if even one rider is infected.
Read also
In contrast to team sports like football or basketball,
where players are intermittently close to each other and rarely for long
durations, the peloton is a prolonged, moving cluster. Riders are constantly
exhaling, breathing heavily, and interacting with one another, whether through
drafting or riding in the slipstream of a competitor. This creates a
“closed-loop” of air circulation, which allows viruses to spread rapidly.
Additionally, cyclists interact closely with their teammates
off the bike. During multi-week races like the Tour de France or the Vuelta a
España, riders live, eat, and travel together, further increasing the chances
of viral spread. A rider who contracts COVID can therefore expose their
entire team, staff, and others in the peloton before realizing they are
infected.
Read also
Endurance Sports and the Immune System
Now we’ve addressed the more obvious aspects, we can find
out more specifically why cyclists are impacted more significantly than other
sports. Cyclists are also uniquely vulnerable to viral infections due to the
nature of the sport itself. Endurance sports are known to suppress the immune
system, particularly during periods of extreme exertion, making athletes more
susceptible to illness. The cumulative physical stress of training, racing, and
recovering creates an "open window" where the body’s immune response
is compromised, leaving athletes more prone to infections.
During a Grand Tour, this susceptibility is heightened.
Cyclists are pushing their bodies to the limit day after day, often riding for
up to six hours in extreme conditions—whether it's heat, rain, or cold mountain
stages. The energy expended in such efforts requires significant recovery, but
the body’s resources are often so depleted that its ability to fend off
infections is diminished.
Read also
The stress of stage racing is not just physical; it’s also
mental. Stress, both psychological and physical, is known to weaken the immune
system. The pressure to perform, maintain a competitive position in the general
classification, and deal with race logistics can all take a toll, leaving
riders even more vulnerable to viruses. For someone like João Almeida, whose
team is banking on his form, the mental strain combined with the physical
exhaustion of racing would have likely further reduced his immunity.
Why Other Sports Are Less Affected by COVID in 2024
While COVID-19 continues to affect professional cycling,
other sports seem to have moved on from the pandemic with fewer disruptions.
There are several reasons for this discrepancy.
First, the structure and environment of most team sports
reduce the likelihood of widespread outbreaks. In football, rugby, or tennis,
athletes are not consistently in close contact for extended periods like
cyclists are in the peloton. Even in sports where there is physical contact,
such as football or basketball, the periods of close proximity are shorter and
there are more opportunities to limit the spread of infection.
Read also
Second, the scheduling and duration of these sports differ
significantly from cycling. Most sports feature single events, matches, or
games that last a few hours at most, followed by periods of recovery or
downtime. In contrast, cyclists compete for days or weeks at a time in stage
races. This continuous exposure to the same group of people—teammates,
competitors, staff—increases the risk of viral transmission.
Moreover, many sports have adopted stronger containment
protocols, such as regular testing, isolation, and vaccination mandates, making
it easier to catch and limit the spread of COVID before it impacts entire teams
or leagues. In cycling, while testing is still widespread, the constant travel
and interaction with locals and media make containment measures less reliable.
What Can Be Done
As COVID-19 continues to disrupt cycling in 2024, it’s clear
that more needs to be done to protect riders and teams. Several potential
measures could help minimize the risk of outbreaks and their impact on races.
- Improved Testing and Isolation Protocols: While testing remains standard in Grand Tours, stricter pre-race and daily testing could be reintroduced to catch infections earlier. In addition, more immediate isolation protocols could help prevent infected riders from spreading the virus to their teammates and the peloton.
- Media Testing: Grand Tours could adopt stricter rules for journalists attending the races, in a bid to limit the transmission of COVID and other viruses that can impact riders performances.
Read also
A Lingering Threat
While other sports have seemingly moved beyond the pandemic,
cycling's unique dynamics make it particularly susceptible to viral outbreaks.
Whether it’s the constant close contact in the peloton, the immune-compromising
effects of endurance racing, or the logistical challenges of long, multi-stage
races, the sport faces a particular set of challenges in keeping riders safe.
In a season already marred by COVID-related withdrawals—such
as Tom Pidcock and Chris Harper at the 2024 Tour de France—cycling must now
confront how to better protect its athletes. The virus may no longer dominate
global headlines, but in the world of professional cycling, it’s still very
much a part of the race.
It must be said that COVID, like any other virus, is
something that riders will unfortunately always have to deal with. It’s an
element of luck or bad luck within the peloton that can never be entirely
removed. But, more should be done to ensure that cyclists can lower the risks
of seeing their races ruined by the lingering virus.
Fin MajorCycling Journalist
Fin Major is a UK-based writer at CyclingUpToDate and has been part of the team since 2024. He is the site’s main writer for FAQs and evergreen explainers and has written around 2,000 pieces for the platform. Alongside this work, he focuses on in-depth analysis and covers the biggest races on the calendar, including the Tour de France, the Giro d’Italia, and La Vuelta a España, providing clear context around performance trends, tactics, and key storylines.
In his reporting, Fin uses reputable data sources such as ProCyclingStats for results, statistics, and historical context. He places strong emphasis on careful sourcing, editorial accuracy, and updating articles promptly when new, verified information becomes available. Outside of writing, Fin is an active cyclist, which supports his practical understanding of the sport and its demands.
claps 1visitors 1
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- so what i understand is: i left a comment calling out the endless author CVs for being an unnecessary flex of expertise, and you responded by lecturing me (and others) on discrimination and value systems. hats off to you. you definitely lost me!Ketterechts09-11-2026
- I just love the flood of Americans into the top ranks of world cycling. In addition to being studs on the bike, they all seem to be excellent emissaries for our country.Occam09-11-2026
- ANATOMY OF A G.O.A.T. EDDY MERCKX about TADEJ POGAČAR: Merckx: “He has revived a style of cycling that we had almost forgotten. He is now better than me.” Key statements by Merckx about Pogačar in 2026: - Acknowledging his superiority: This time, Merckx openly admitted, without any subsequent backtracking or reservations, that Pogačar had surpassed him and was now above him. This contrasts with 2024, when he quickly softened his remarks about Pogačar being faster. - The possibility of a historic triple (Giro, Tour and Vuelta): During the July Tour de France (where Pogi claimed his fifth title), Merckx stated that Pogi was the only cyclist in history capable of winning all three Grand Tours (the Giro d'Italia, Tour de France and Vuelta a España) in a single season, provided the conditions were right and he had sufficient team support. - Lack of serious competition: Merckx emphasised that Pogačar has no real rivals in the mountains since 2024, thanks to his extraordinary climbing ability and the fact that he continues to improve despite still being under 28 (he turned 28 in autumn 2026). - Praise for his racing style: Merckx highlighted how Pogačar is bringing back the aggressive, uncompromising spirit of cycling's golden era, when races were not merely about calculated stages and tactical conservatism, but about attacking from long distances. PS: This is not "boring" ... this is called making real history, not only statistical history. Capish?PogiSloFans09-11-2026
- It’s off-season mate, I’m bored and fed up with the mediocrity of people unwilling to provoke change when they admit things aren’t right. What have you done lately to make anyone realise you won’t put up with things? What conversation, are you dictating to me which part of the incident I have to be interested in or telling me other parts are taboo? That’s what I guess the UCI would really like, let them moan, let it blow over for them pass on to the next thing, let’s keep the status quo, let’s try our best not reviewing or revealing anything about decision-making just like every time before, they’re used to it by now so we can take the risk they’ll never give us grief.Jumpyjohn09-11-2026
- As far as CUTD headlines go this is far from the worst. It helps if you look at it twice and realise it’s a list of descriptions from distinct events. You can’t deny the reality of being a rival if you consider the picture immediately below, frontrunner is unfortunate but I’m guessing this time it’s more a linguistic failure than a clickbaiting opportunity. Just a reminder that this is not an anglo website, for those who find it too tedious to interpret text to get the gist of things which are rarely of great importance (as opposed to eg purposely biaised DOJ extradition translations in order to achieve hidden agendas), there are plenty of anglo cycling websites google can suggest.Jumpyjohn09-11-2026
- Ah, finally someone willing to be a bit proactive.Jumpyjohn09-11-2026
- So? Do you understand the way instructions, decisions and authority work? Do you think in a football match if after a match (or even after play has gone on) a player tells the referee he did touch the ball with his hands when the referee didn’t award opponents a penalty that they will revise the score or force a replay? You really don’t get my point, it’s not against the rider but everyone here is so emotional for her they can’t get back to an issue which needs resolving for the future and the first step (or maybe second) is to try to understand how and why it happens, none of you have contributed in the least to that. All everyone is interested in is letting everyone know they agree how unjust it was, not even sure anyone thinks that could affect anything.Jumpyjohn09-11-2026
- Shouldn’t you be in MOUrning?Jumpyjohn09-11-2026
- Maybe you don’t like it and that’s fine, we all have different sensibilities and topics that touch us, but as you try to show me, it doesn’t hurt to reflect and compare ourselves to others behaving similarly. What precisely is the difference between a sports fan interested in every detail of his/her hero’s life and a celeb fan having the same hobby? It’s far more interesting to learn and think about how and why (which) people do things than reading about what they are actually doing. And just to add another level, maybe you’ll agree we don’t use the same value system for everyone, we discriminate in an enormous number of systematic ways. For example, when is the last time you saw a discussion arguing about the achievements of two politicians to compare or for that matter two business leaders apart from the comparison of hypothetical wealth accumulated? Perhaps you misunderstood the intention?Jumpyjohn09-11-2026
- I don’t think I know what’s beneath the surface but I am willing to think about it, discuss it, compare it to a known past, extrapolate to a potential future and ask/try to find out truth or even take action within my powers (boycotting something or someone is within EVERY person’s reach). If you think your attitude has more chance of changing a result, a process, a system or an institution or it just makes you feel good, keep at it but to me it looks like you’ve already given up before trying.Jumpyjohn09-11-2026
Loading
Write a comment












