ANALYSIS | Van der Poel, Vingegaard, Van Aert... The 5 biggest names missing from the Kigali World Championships
Cycling
It’s finally time for the biggest weekend of the cycling
season. It’s time for the rainbow jerseys to be handed out. This weekend’s
world championships road race in Kigali will crown 2025’s world champions on
one of the hardest courses in recent memory, but it will do so without several
of the sport’s biggest names. For different reasons, family, injury, season
management, or simply timing, some headline acts won’t roll down the start
ramp. Their absences change tactics, redraw leadership hierarchies and subtly
alter how the finale could unfold on Mount Kigali and Kimihurura. Here’s why
each rider isn’t there, and what it means.
Mathieu van der Poel
The 2023 world road champion is not on the Dutch start list for Kigali, a
decision confirmed by the KNWU in mid-August. In his place, the Netherlands
shifted leadership to Thymen Arensman after his two Tour de France stage wins,
with Bauke Mollema and others forming a climber-heavy support group for a
course that piles on altitude and repeated ascents.
On paper, many of the climbs on Sunday’s route look tailor
made for Van der Poel. But, in truth, it is likely the accumulation of climbing
would be too much for him, and that is overall the reason why Van der Poel
won’t be here. Van der Poel won a seventh cyclocross rainbow jersey back in
February, and has won two monuments, and a Tour de France stage, in 2025. But,
after competing in the mountain bike world championships earlier this month, he
called time on his campaign.
Koos Moerenhout as much as admitted the team would have to
be opportunistic without Van der Poel: “We don’t have a clear favorite this
year, like we did with Mathieu van der Poel,” he said to Cycling News. “Thymen
Arensman has, of course, done some fantastic performances and he will certainly
be a key player. But several other riders will also have the freedom to compete
heading into the final.”
Read also
Jonas Vingegaard
The two-time Tour winner and recent Vuelta winner publicly ruled out Kigali and
pivoted to the European Championships in France a week later, a target that
better fits his calendar after the Vuelta. At one point in 2025, it looked like
we would see Pogacar and Vingegaard face off twice after the Tour, at the
Vuelta and the world championships. Instead, we will have to wait until next
July for a showdown between the two best climbers.
He explained the calculus in his pre-Vuelta press
conference: “We have decided that we want to go for the Europeans instead. You
need to be really fresh to go to World Championships this year. It requires a
lot of the riders participating in it, and we don’t know how I’ll come out of
the Vuelta. We decided it was better not to do it. I still want to do the
European Championships instead and I’ll have some time after the Vuelta to
focus on that.” The effect for Denmark is immediate: leadership passes to Mattias
Skjelmose on a course that still rewards climbers but arrives a touch too soon
after a three-week Grand Tour for Vingegaard’s liking.
From a race-shape perspective, Vingegaard’s absence removes
one of the few riders able to match Tadej Pogacar in pure uphill tempo when the
bunch is already thinned to the bone. It also alters how other teams mark moves,
without the Danish favourite, the onus shifts even more heavily onto the likes
of Belgium, Spain and Britain to chase late-race accelerations, particularly
from Pogacar.
Read also
Wout van Aert
Team Visma | Lease a Bike’s other perennial headline act won’t be in Kigali
either. After a year that included two Grand Tours, the Spring Classics block
and a late Tour de France stage win where he dropped Pogacar, Van Aert and
Visma Lease a Bike set an earlier finish line for 2025.
“It’s important to still set some important goals for the
last part of the season, and with this calendar, we’ve certainly succeeded,” he
said of a schedule that ended at the Super 8 Classic last weekend. “At the same
time, after such a packed season, it’s crucial not to overdo it. That’s why
we’ve decided to end my season after the Super 8 Classic and skip both the
World Championships and European Championships.”
His absence also forces a sharper definition of roles around
Remco Evenepoel, particularly in heat and altitude where resource management
becomes the race inside the race. Without Van Aert’s power on the cobbles to
close counters, Belgium’s support cast must be more selective about which moves
they mark and when to commit domestiques to tempo. It’s not fatal to their
chances, Evenepoel has won countless races without Van Aert, but it narrows the
margin for error on a profile that punishes one bad decision. It’s all in for
Evenepoel for Belgium.

Van Aert is absent from the World Championships despite the repeated calls from national coach Serge Pauwels. @Imago
Read also
Lotte Kopecky
The reigning two-time women’s world road champion decided earlier this month
not to defend her title in Kigali. Belgian Cycling announced its rosters with
Kopecky absent; national coach Ludwig Willems put the choice down to form and
headspace. “She had hoped for a turnaround in the final weeks, but now she’s
decided to skip the World Championships because she’s not convinced she’s 100%
ready. It’s largely a mental issue,” he told WielerFlits.
He added, “We’re grateful for what Lotte has achieved. But
we have to give her time to recharge, rest, and take stock. Then we’ll see a
better version of Lotte in the foreseeable future.” Those quotes sit alongside
a bruising stretch of injuries and back problems across the summer, compounded
by her crash and subsequent vertebral fractures at the Tour de l’Ardèche, which
ultimately ended her season and also ruled her out of the Track Worlds.
Read also
The tactical knock-on is stark for Belgium. With Kopecky out
and national champion Justine Ghekiere later withdrawn after a high-speed crash
at GP Stuttgart, the team is reduced to a punchy but less proven group, Marthe
Goossens, Marieke Meert, Julie Van de Velde and Margot Vanpachtenbeke.
Kopecky was superb in both Glasgow in 2023, and in Zurich in
2024, but we will not see the same magic this year and Belgium will need to
play another card. On a circuit that keeps climbing, they’ll likely race for
the break and hope attrition brings the favourites back rather than controlling
for a single leader. It’s a different Belgian script than the last two years,
and it opens the door wider to the Netherlands and France.

Kopecky did not return to try and defend her title in Kigali. @Sirotti
Marianne Vos
The Dutch icon withdrew in the week leading into Kigali to stay with her family
after her father underwent surgery. Netherlands coach Laurens ten Dam spelled
out the decision, and its human logic, clearly to Cycling News, “Her father had
surgery last week … it’s been a very tense and hectic few days for Marianne. I
called her this morning and we both said ‘you’re staying home’.”
He added a line that doubles as the headline for the Dutch, “Marianne
Vos isn’t necessarily replaceable. So I don’t want Femke to step into those
shoes. I don’t want to put that pressure on her.” Femke de Vries replaces Vos
on a Netherlands squad that still fields Demi Vollering and Anna van der
Breggen on a course tailored to the pure climbers. Both Vollering and van der
Breggen were on the podium of last week’s time trial, and in truth the course
is better suited for them than for Vos.
From a competitive standpoint, Vos’s absence strips the
Dutch of their most multi-tool finisher: a rider who can win from a reduced
bunch, a small sprint, or a late-race counter. It nudges the team toward a more
binary plan built around Vollering’s sustained climbing and Van der Breggen’s too.
You can still win Worlds with that pairing; you just lose the fail-safe option
that Vos so often provides in chaotic finales.
Read also
Fin MajorCycling Journalist
Fin Major is a UK-based writer at CyclingUpToDate and has been part of the team since 2024. He is the site’s main writer for FAQs and evergreen explainers and has written around 2,000 pieces for the platform. Alongside this work, he focuses on in-depth analysis and covers the biggest races on the calendar, including the Tour de France, the Giro d’Italia, and La Vuelta a España, providing clear context around performance trends, tactics, and key storylines.
In his reporting, Fin uses reputable data sources such as ProCyclingStats for results, statistics, and historical context. He places strong emphasis on careful sourcing, editorial accuracy, and updating articles promptly when new, verified information becomes available. Outside of writing, Fin is an active cyclist, which supports his practical understanding of the sport and its demands.
claps 0visitors 0
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- He should have been allowed to go to Movistar. Right now both arent a good fit for each other and are just wasting each other's time and effortabstractengineer08-11-2026
- Thibau Nys does exactly what Iserbyt is calling for
Rafionain-Glas08-11-2026 - i did not see it. was the relegation justified or an overly hard decision? and don‘t cross riders deviate from straight lines all the time? bumping into each others when they cut corners, etc … why being more strict with the rules on the finish sprint?Ketterechts08-11-2026
- seems like we are advertising the website with pointless comments…Ketterechts08-11-2026
- So?Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- The UCI do have their favorites.
Front24208-11-2026 - On a positive note, you maybe notice turning this topic into a discussion has the benefit of eliminating certain participants who do not see how they can turn it back to their sole interest ;-)Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- People see what they want to. I am actually the opposite of your accusation, probably more of a rebel than most of you who don’t get the big picture. The difference is, I don’t go moaning publicly about the consequences of my transgressions, I understand the need for rules and I take my OWN responsibility when deciding to ignore or break them or doing so involuntarily. I will also not hesitate to state my case or argue vehemently when relevant, sometimes it works, sometimes it makes things worse but that’s the price to pay for principles and having character.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- That may be but that was unknown to others and nothing says that’s the whole truth. Again, don’t try to misinterpret, it is a call and technically it is correct. Besides, even if there is a valid reason, that does not disqualify the ruling or punishment as far as the rules have been developed. I don’t think they’re as far as in football where for handball there is a distinction (in some ways and specific cases) between intentional or not. And football can be just as harsh and people live with it, eg the offside rule, also judged to within tiny fractions but often wrong or ignored. It’s the nature of every collective organisation and sometimes I wonder if our rebellion against it isn’t seated in the feelings we carry from the injustices we’ve felt personally, like being flashed driving 1km/h too fast when we are explained limits are just a security measure but we are absolutely certain not to have endangered anyone with our transgression. The problem is, nobody has better solutions and no 2 people have the same interpretation of where a limit should be.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- Because for you deviated implies the other rider MUST have been made to fall and fail to finish ??? I don’t know if you ride a bike but next time someone carves you up or drives dangerously close, just hold back from those feelings of changing something, reporting or filming or even complaining. Everyone will just say, hey you’re still here undamaged, doesn’t seem like anyone did anything.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
Loading
Write a comment










