
The rumours surrounding Remco Evenepoel’s potential move
from Soudal – Quick-Step to Red Bull – BORA – hansgrohe have been circulating
for years, often met with a mix of skepticism and fatigue from fans. But this
time, the speculation has real substance, and increasing credibility. According
to Daniel Benson, multiple sources close to the negotiations suggest the deal
is nearing completion, with estimates putting it at 70 to 80 percent done. It
would be a four-year contract, beginning in 2026, and reportedly includes a
buyout clause from his current deal.
Officially, Soudal – Quick-Step CEO Jurgen Fore remains
calm. Speaking to Vive le Velo following Evenepoel’s stage 5 victory at the
Tour de France yesterday, Fore said, “He still has a contract until the end of
2026, and we assume he will honor it. So he'll definitely be riding with us for
another year. But in the long run, we are working on a future with and without
Remco."
Read also
That last line tells you all you need to know, Quick-Step is
preparing for life after their star rider. And from Evenepoel’s perspective,
the reasoning behind a move is increasingly difficult to dispute.
At just 25, Evenepoel is one of the most gifted all-rounders
in the sport. He’s already won a Grand Tour, a World Championship,
Liège–Bastogne–Liège, Olympic gold, and time trials at the highest level. But
the gap between him and the likes of Tadej Pogacar and Jonas
Vingegaard, especially in a Grand Tour context in the mountains, is clearly
still significant.
His dominant win in the stage 5 time trial in Caen vaulted
him to second overall at the Tour, but observers know how the script often
unfolds in the third week: Pogacar and Vingegaard typically have the team
strength and climbing depth to break the race apart, and Evenepoel is often
left to fend for himself.
Read also
We saw it at the Critérium du Dauphiné earlier this year. On
the mountain stages, Evenepoel had no reliable lieutenants in the crucial
moments. Meanwhile, Pogacar hads the likes of Adam Yates, and João Almeida, and
Vingegaard could count on Sepp Kuss, Simon Yates, and Matteo Jorgenson.
Evenepoel, despite fighting hard, had to burn matches just
to hold position, energy he could not afford to lose. The situation is worse in
2025, as Evenepoel is without the injured Mikel Landa for the Tour.
That difference in support is more than just tactical. It’s
systemic. Quick-Step, for all its success as a Classics and on individual staes,
has never truly transformed into a Grand Tour-focused team. Patrick Lefevere
resisted a complete structural overhaul before his departure in 2024, and
though some support has arrived in recent seasons, the depth just isn’t there
to match the likes of UAE Team Emirates or Visma | Lease a Bike.
Read also
That’s where Red Bull – BORA – hansgrohe comes in. Flush
with new financial backing and aiming to build a Tour-winning operation around
Primoz Roglic, who is turning 36 this year, they’re already looking toward the
future. Evenepoel is that future. With Red Bull's resources, they could invest
in the kind of mountain domestiques, support staff, and sports science
infrastructure needed to close the gap to the top two teams.
If Evenepoel does move, it could be positive news for
cycling as we move closer and closer to a true ‘Big Three.’ And, Quick-Step
would be ok without Evenepoel, as they still have Tim Merlier who is arguably
the fastest sprinter in the world in 2025.
For now, Evenepoel remains in Quick-Step colours, battling
gamely in a Tour that still has two and a half weeks to run. But all signs
suggest his long-term ambitions, and perhaps his loyalty, lie elsewhere.
Read also
Fin MajorCycling Journalist
Fin Major is a UK-based writer at CyclingUpToDate and has been part of the team since 2024. He is the site’s main writer for FAQs and evergreen explainers and has written around 2,000 pieces for the platform. Alongside this work, he focuses on in-depth analysis and covers the biggest races on the calendar, including the Tour de France, the Giro d’Italia, and La Vuelta a España, providing clear context around performance trends, tactics, and key storylines.
In his reporting, Fin uses reputable data sources such as ProCyclingStats for results, statistics, and historical context. He places strong emphasis on careful sourcing, editorial accuracy, and updating articles promptly when new, verified information becomes available. Outside of writing, Fin is an active cyclist, which supports his practical understanding of the sport and its demands.
claps 0visitors 0
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- Thibau Nys does exactly what Iserbyt is calling for
Rafionain-Glas08-11-2026 - i did not see it. was the relegation justified or an overly hard decision? and don‘t cross riders deviate from straight lines all the time? bumping into each others when they cut corners, etc … why being more strict with the rules on the finish sprint?Ketterechts08-11-2026
- seems like we are advertising the website with pointless comments…Ketterechts08-11-2026
- So?Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- The UCI do have their favorites.
Front24208-11-2026 - On a positive note, you maybe notice turning this topic into a discussion has the benefit of eliminating certain participants who do not see how they can turn it back to their sole interest ;-)Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- People see what they want to. I am actually the opposite of your accusation, probably more of a rebel than most of you who don’t get the big picture. The difference is, I don’t go moaning publicly about the consequences of my transgressions, I understand the need for rules and I take my OWN responsibility when deciding to ignore or break them or doing so involuntarily. I will also not hesitate to state my case or argue vehemently when relevant, sometimes it works, sometimes it makes things worse but that’s the price to pay for principles and having character.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- That may be but that was unknown to others and nothing says that’s the whole truth. Again, don’t try to misinterpret, it is a call and technically it is correct. Besides, even if there is a valid reason, that does not disqualify the ruling or punishment as far as the rules have been developed. I don’t think they’re as far as in football where for handball there is a distinction (in some ways and specific cases) between intentional or not. And football can be just as harsh and people live with it, eg the offside rule, also judged to within tiny fractions but often wrong or ignored. It’s the nature of every collective organisation and sometimes I wonder if our rebellion against it isn’t seated in the feelings we carry from the injustices we’ve felt personally, like being flashed driving 1km/h too fast when we are explained limits are just a security measure but we are absolutely certain not to have endangered anyone with our transgression. The problem is, nobody has better solutions and no 2 people have the same interpretation of where a limit should be.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- Because for you deviated implies the other rider MUST have been made to fall and fail to finish ??? I don’t know if you ride a bike but next time someone carves you up or drives dangerously close, just hold back from those feelings of changing something, reporting or filming or even complaining. Everyone will just say, hey you’re still here undamaged, doesn’t seem like anyone did anything.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- And we, what are we doing?Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
Loading
3 Comments









