megasmacky

+22

Latest comments

+0

megasmacky

Wow, you really don't think much of your fellow readers do you? Trying to pass off this nonsense. First of all, nobody said he came from nowhere. He was obviously wildly talented, and that was clear, as you say, long before he was a pro. What is undeniably true is he came from nowhere as a GC candidate in GTs. He had virtually no GC resume before he finished 4th in the 98 Vuelta. He'd never come even close to a good GC finish before that. He was absolutely stomped in the TT's by Indurain in his first two Tours. He'd never won or come close to winning a mtn stage. He said himself many times, in his early career, in a commendable display of honesty, that he was not that sort of rider. There's never been a GT champion in modern history with anything like his lack of GC credentials. GC riders look like GC riders from their first years racing. They win junior staqe races, they win the Baby Giro or the Tour de L'Avenir, whatever. Saying that he would have won the Tour if all were clean is absurd, backed by zero evidence. He wouldn't have even come close. If another rider said he would, and I doubt they did, you certainly do nothing to back up this claim, they said it because riders knew that angering Armstrong was a bad idea. They were humouring him. Also, guys like Lemond and Indurain look worse than him because they decided that Armstrong's almost freakish obsession with remaining hyper fit wasn't for them. Indurain likes tinkering with old tractors, and doesn't seem to give a toss about the sport at all. Lemond has had health issues and accidents that didn't have any clear connection with their cycling career. Oh, and Fignon died of cancer, you d*ck.

01:21

+5

megasmacky

I didn't even know he'd divorced.

31-12-2025 17:54

Loading