Wout van Aert wins solo on the Champs-Elysees! Tadej Pogacar wins Tour de France but is beaten by Visma on hectic stage 21
Cycling
Wout van Aert is a rider that does not win often but when he does, it's big. His first win of the year was at the Giro's 'Strade Bianche' stage and the Team Visma | Lease a Bike rider has now won stage 21 of the Tour de France. The final day of the race was won by the Belgian with a solo attack as he dropped Tadej Pogacar on the final ascent of the Montmartre.
The riders finally reached Paris after a small celebration early in the day, despite the final circuit including some climbing and even early there being a small ascent. The riders could enjoy their calm ride in the outskirts of the city before entering the final circuit where riders also met the rain.
Before the Montmartre circuit we had Florian Lipowitz and Quinn Simmons delivering some early action with an interesting breakaway, one that was short lived as the leadout battle for the first narrow cobbled ascent was fierce and the pace never really slowed down. The heavy rain that was falling made the circuit very treacherous.
Julian Alaphilippe launched an attack the first time up Montmartre with Arnaud de Lie in the wheel, closed by Tadej Pogacar. A group of around 25 riders formed itself in front, missing Jonathan Milan, Tim Merlier and the last winner of a sprint on the Champs-Élysées - Jordi Meeus. On the second ascent Pogacar hit the front to split the group, followed only by Visma's Wout van Aert and Matteo Jorgenson; Matteo Trentin, Davide Ballerini and Matej Mohoric. The group collaborated into the final ascent extending it's gap over the chasers.
Read also
Jorgenson attacked several times before the final climb to take advantage of Visma's superiority but Mohoric and Trentin closed down the attacks. Pogacar moved on the final climb of Montmartre but then in the final meters of the climb Van Aert attacked over the yellow jersey and got a gap that he would take into the descent and the final flat kilometers. Van Aert took a glorious victory in Paris, his second of the year but one that will last for the ages.
Davide Ballerini rode to an impressive second place but disappointed without the stage victory that could've changed his career, followed by Matej Mohorric. Pogacar was fourth at the finish line, crossing it in celebration as he confirmed his overall victory.
Read also
Results powered by FirstCycling.com

Félix SernaCycling Journalist
Félix Serna is a writer at CyclingUpToDate and has been part of the team since 2025. He covers professional cycling across both the men’s and women’s calendars, with a focus on UCI rankings, race developments, and rider performance. His work includes interview-based reports, liveblogs, and tournament coverage designed to provide clear, accurate context throughout the season.
In his reporting, Félix regularly uses ProCyclingStats for results, statistics, and historical reference. He places strong emphasis on careful sourcing, editorial accuracy, and updating articles promptly when new, verified information becomes available. He holds a bachelor’s degree in International Studies.
claps 1visitors 1
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- Thibau Nys does exactly what Iserbyt is calling for
Rafionain-Glas08-11-2026 - i did not see it. was the relegation justified or an overly hard decision? and don‘t cross riders deviate from straight lines all the time? bumping into each others when they cut corners, etc … why being more strict with the rules on the finish sprint?Ketterechts08-11-2026
- seems like we are advertising the website with pointless comments…Ketterechts08-11-2026
- So?Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- The UCI do have their favorites.
Front24208-11-2026 - On a positive note, you maybe notice turning this topic into a discussion has the benefit of eliminating certain participants who do not see how they can turn it back to their sole interest ;-)Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- People see what they want to. I am actually the opposite of your accusation, probably more of a rebel than most of you who don’t get the big picture. The difference is, I don’t go moaning publicly about the consequences of my transgressions, I understand the need for rules and I take my OWN responsibility when deciding to ignore or break them or doing so involuntarily. I will also not hesitate to state my case or argue vehemently when relevant, sometimes it works, sometimes it makes things worse but that’s the price to pay for principles and having character.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- That may be but that was unknown to others and nothing says that’s the whole truth. Again, don’t try to misinterpret, it is a call and technically it is correct. Besides, even if there is a valid reason, that does not disqualify the ruling or punishment as far as the rules have been developed. I don’t think they’re as far as in football where for handball there is a distinction (in some ways and specific cases) between intentional or not. And football can be just as harsh and people live with it, eg the offside rule, also judged to within tiny fractions but often wrong or ignored. It’s the nature of every collective organisation and sometimes I wonder if our rebellion against it isn’t seated in the feelings we carry from the injustices we’ve felt personally, like being flashed driving 1km/h too fast when we are explained limits are just a security measure but we are absolutely certain not to have endangered anyone with our transgression. The problem is, nobody has better solutions and no 2 people have the same interpretation of where a limit should be.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- Because for you deviated implies the other rider MUST have been made to fall and fail to finish ??? I don’t know if you ride a bike but next time someone carves you up or drives dangerously close, just hold back from those feelings of changing something, reporting or filming or even complaining. Everyone will just say, hey you’re still here undamaged, doesn’t seem like anyone did anything.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- And we, what are we doing?Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
Loading
1 Comments







