That combination of setbacks, Riis explained, makes it difficult to draw firm conclusions about where Vingegaard currently stands. “Everything depends on how much he has trained after his illness, how long a break he has had, and how good his form was beforehand. We still don’t have answers to that,” he said, before adding a note of reassurance. “So it’s not ideal, but I’m not hugely concerned.”
It is precisely that lack of clear answers which sits at the heart of Riis’ frustration. Vingegaard crashed on a training ride near Malaga after being followed by amateur riders, an incident that later sparked a wider debate inside the peloton about fan behaviour on public roads. While
Team Visma | Lease a Bike confirmed that he avoided serious injury and urged cyclists to respect riders’ space during training, details about how the crash affected his preparation have remained limited.
Riis questions Visma’s communication
For Riis, that absence of detail has become a familiar pattern. “The unfortunate thing for the rest of us, when it comes to Jonas, is that we never get communication about where he stands from the Visma team,” he said. “It’s the same problem again and again.”
In his view, the issue is compounded by the lack of clarity around the consequences of the crash itself. “We also haven’t heard anything about how the crash affected him.”
Those remarks come after weeks of speculation surrounding Vingegaard’s condition, particularly once his absence from the
UAE Tour was confirmed. While the team have framed the decision as a precaution, prioritising recovery after illness, Riis’ comments suggest that even experienced observers are left piecing together the situation without firm guidance from the team.
Asked whether he would have handled communication differently had he been in charge, Riis did not dwell on the question. “I probably would have, yes,” he said, a brief response that nonetheless underlined his belief that greater openness would have been preferable.
Context beyond the crash itself
Riis’ intervention adds another layer to a story that has already evolved beyond the crash itself.
Earlier reactions from riders such as Paul Penhoet and Benjamin Thomas framed the incident within a broader discussion about cycling’s accessibility and the pressures created by increasingly crowded training hubs in Spain. Riis, by contrast, shifts the focus away from fan behaviour and towards how teams manage information when setbacks occur.
Team Visma | Lease a Bike have responded by insisting they are sharing what they can. Press officer Emile Vaessen is quoted in the Ekstra Bladet article as saying the team “continuously share openly and transparently what we currently know” and that the available information has already been made public.
For Riis, however, the central issue is not whether Vingegaard’s season is in jeopardy, but whether the silence surrounding his condition is necessary. His message is measured rather than confrontational, but clear nonetheless: without clearer communication, uncertainty will continue to fill the gaps left by official updates.