
Wout van Aert closed out the 2025 Tour de France in
spectacular style, dropping Tadej Pogacar to win the final stage in Paris,
ending his long wait for a tenth Tour stage win. Simon Yates had already
delivered a stage victory for Team Visma | Lease a Bike, but their campaign
ultimately fell short of its primary goal: the yellow jersey. Jonas Vingegaard
finished second behind a dominant Pogacar, who comfortably claimed his fourth
Tour title. Dutch analyst Michael Boogerd broke down the team’s performance
this July in De Telegraaf, and didn’t shy away from hard truths.
"The latter couldn't be of the value to Vingegaard
during this Tour that he and the team had expected. The fact that he still
showed this resilience is a testament to the rider that Van Aert is. He's
always someone who keeps fighting," Boogerd said, reflecting on the
Belgian’s Paris heroics on Sunday. "Overall, the team gave it their all.
However, Visma was deemed too weak to win this Tour de France. And some moments
should have been handled differently."
Boogerd praised the team's early approach, noting that
"there was little to criticize about Visma's racing style, especially in
the first ten days." Their aggressive tactics in stage 1, creating
echelons that created time gaps to Evenepoel and Roglic, showed their intent
from the outset. "With Vingegaard, Visma had only come to win the Tour,
and they were fully committed to it from the very beginning. In those difficult
first stages with a classic feel, Vingegaard was consistently very strong at
the front."
But in the mountains, they lacked the firepower of previous
years, and could do nothing to wobble the mighty Pogacar. "Visma wasn't as
dominant in the mountain stages as they were in the years 2020 through
2023," Boogerd noted.
Read also
“Back then, they controlled those kinds of stages, with
Vingegaard winning the Tour in 2022 and 2023, but now they didn't have the
strength to do so. The level of this eight-man team was lower across the board.
Still, I think Visma entertained the fans during this Tour and built a lot of
goodwill with their aggressive racing style."
Looking ahead, Boogerd suggested Vingegaard might benefit
from broadening his calendar. "Perhaps it would be wise for Vingegaard to
ride more one-day races in the future, instead of focusing solely on the Tour,
with other stage races as preparation." He explained, "In the
classics, there's a different way of racing, and you experience what it's like
to ride tough finales, and then you also gain a certain toughness.
“You can see that Pogacar benefits greatly from that. Of
course, not every rider is the same, and I don't know if it helps Vingegaard as
well, but you can certainly try. You have to keep all options open and change
your 'tactics' if something isn't working."
Read also
Boogerd also raised the issue of leadership within the team
car. "It might also be helpful to have a team manager in the car who has
competed for victory in the finals in the past. Visma doesn't really have
that," he said.
"Yes, Frans Maassen, but I wonder what influence he has
on the race. Someone who does have that experience can better convey it to the
riders. Think of it this way: if you've never ridden a Tour de France, you
can't explain it to anyone."
"That's not a criticism of these team leaders, but if
you want to improve, you can certainly consider such an extra boost of quality
as a team," Boogerd emphasised once again. "Every detail can help if
you want to win the Tour."
Read also
Fin MajorCycling Journalist
Fin Major is a UK-based writer at CyclingUpToDate and has been part of the team since 2024. He is the site’s main writer for FAQs and evergreen explainers and has written around 2,000 pieces for the platform. Alongside this work, he focuses on in-depth analysis and covers the biggest races on the calendar, including the Tour de France, the Giro d’Italia, and La Vuelta a España, providing clear context around performance trends, tactics, and key storylines.
In his reporting, Fin uses reputable data sources such as ProCyclingStats for results, statistics, and historical context. He places strong emphasis on careful sourcing, editorial accuracy, and updating articles promptly when new, verified information becomes available. Outside of writing, Fin is an active cyclist, which supports his practical understanding of the sport and its demands.
claps 5visitors 4
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- On a positive note, you maybe notice turning this topic into a discussion has the benefit of eliminating certain participants who do not see how they can turn it back to their sole interest ;-)Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- People see what they want to. I am actually the opposite of your accusation, probably more of a rebel than most of you who don’t get the big picture. The difference is, I don’t go moaning publicly about the consequences of my transgressions, I understand the need for rules and I take my OWN responsibility when deciding to ignore or break them or doing so involuntarily. I will also not hesitate to state my case or argue vehemently when relevant, sometimes it works, sometimes it makes things worse but that’s the price to pay for principles and having character.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- That may be but that was unknown to others and nothing says that’s the whole truth. Again, don’t try to misinterpret, it is a call and technically it is correct. Besides, even if there is a valid reason, that does not disqualify the ruling or punishment as far as the rules have been developed. I don’t think they’re as far as in football where for handball there is a distinction (in some ways and specific cases) between intentional or not. And football can be just as harsh and people live with it, eg the offside rule, also judged to within tiny fractions but often wrong or ignored. It’s the nature of every collective organisation and sometimes I wonder if our rebellion against it isn’t seated in the feelings we carry from the injustices we’ve felt personally, like being flashed driving 1km/h too fast when we are explained limits are just a security measure but we are absolutely certain not to have endangered anyone with our transgression. The problem is, nobody has better solutions and no 2 people have the same interpretation of where a limit should be.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- Because for you deviated implies the other rider MUST have been made to fall and fail to finish ??? I don’t know if you ride a bike but next time someone carves you up or drives dangerously close, just hold back from those feelings of changing something, reporting or filming or even complaining. Everyone will just say, hey you’re still here undamaged, doesn’t seem like anyone did anything.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- And we, what are we doing?Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- And yet, it attracts people, even you. What’s more, it attracts the rival fanboys to fill cyberspace with endless pointless my hero is better than your hero blabla that’s all been heard before and only helps sell the site as an advertising platform. You know what the solution is but most can’t resist. No different than women who follow and discuss celebs through gossip magazines.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- he is doing 460 watts for 35 min to achieve 7 w/kg with VO2 at 96 , just unreal numbers.abstractengineer08-11-2026
- Just do it, and put up with the consequencesJumpyjohn08-11-2026
- "was a headliner at the Tour de France" Nobody cared about Piddie. Only rivals that were there for Pogi, Jonas, Remco, Sexias, Lipo, Del Toro and they were all expected to lose. Piddie was not even in any conversation.abstractengineer08-11-2026
- exactly, he had an amazing season, but with these overstatements they don‘t do him good.Ketterechts08-11-2026
Loading
Write a comment







