
Stage 3 of the 2025 Vuelta a España delivered a huge upset,
as David Gaudu stunned the Danish pair of Mads Pedersen and Jonas Vingegaard to
win on the uphill finish in Mondovì. The Frenchman timed his attack to
perfection on the final switchback, slipping inside Pedersen and Vingegaard to
claim his first stage win of this year’s race. While the result was celebrated
in the Groupama – FDJ camp, Chris Horner was busy unpacking exactly how it all
unfolded on the former winner of the Vuelta’s podcast.
From the start, Horner identified stage 3 as one that should
have been perfect for Lidl-Trek and Pedersen. “This is a perfect stage for a
classic rider like Mads Pedersen,” he said, pointing to the 2.4km finish with
its 7% ramps in the final kilometre. According to Horner, the Dane’s raw
finishing speed should have been decisive if his team could deliver him to the
last 200 metres in control.
After all, Pedersen comes into the Vuelta after an
incredibly impressive Giro d’Italia, where he won 4 stages and the points
classification. Alongside Jasper Philipsen, he is the favourite for green in
Spain.
The early break of Sean Quinn, Patrick Gamper, Alessandro
Verre and Luca van Boven didn’t overly concern the peloton, with Lidl-Trek
riding tempo to keep the gap under control. Horner noted how disciplined the
American squad was: “They got on the front too much. They left Ciccone isolated
the day before, and here again they risked repeating the mistake by making it
too hard and fast.”
Read also
Verre’s KOM efforts and Quinn’s long solo spell kept the
race lively, but Horner’s attention was fixed on how Lidl-Trek and Visma
handled the final climb of the day up to the finish.
“This is exactly what you want to do if you’re Visma–Lease a
Bike. The final climb really starts at 2.4 kilometres to go. You want to drive
it 100% because you have the best climber in the world in Jonas Vingegaard,” he
said. Yet Horner stressed that Lidl-Trek had the opposite responsibility: “If
you’re Lidl-Trek, you don’t want to drive it that hard. You just want to keep
Pedersen in position and fresh, because Mads is the fastest sprinter.”
Instead, the American analyst was left baffled by a series
of tactical errors. He tore into Ben Turner of INEOS, who launched too early in
support of their fastest finisher, Filippo Ganna. “Ben Turner… he doesn’t know
how to do a proper lead-out. He’s panicking, looking left, right and center.
This is a bad plan,” Horner said bluntly. Turner’s surge stretched the group
and made the finale harder than it needed to be, playing straight into
Vingegaard’s hands.
Read also
As the leaders reached the final kilometre, Horner
identified another misstep from Lidl-Trek in support of Pedersen. “Ciccone can
back off and do a wise move. He can slot behind Visma and save his legs.
Instead, he throws everything into it and drags Pedersen too deep into the
red,” he explained. By overextending on the front, Ciccone inadvertently
reduced Pedersen’s finishing kick, giving rivals the opening they needed to
stand a chance.
The decisive moment came inside the last 65 metres, when
Gaudu stormed the inside of the final corner. Horner was emphatic in his
praise: “At 65 meters to go… David Gaudu comes past Jonas Vingegaard and Mads
Pedersen on the inside. He gets the gap, and he wins.”
When Vingegaard complained afterwards that Gaudu had chopped
him, Horner dismissed it: “What did you expect? You always protect the inside
of the corner or you’re going to get beat every time, especially if you back
off when Gaudu is not backing off.”
Read also
For Horner, the story of stage 3 wasn’t just Gaudu’s
brilliance, but also Lidl-Trek’s repeated miscalculations in the build up to
the sprint. “You guys made the exact same tactical mistake as stage two where
you got on the front too soon and blew up too early and left the sprinter
isolated,” he said, arguing that Pedersen was forced to launch earlier than he
wanted. “This time, Mads jumped too far out. Jonas and Gaudu followed
perfectly, and Gaudu took the win.”
The former Vuelta champion closed his recap by saluting Groupama
- FDJ’s execution. “Congratulations, David Gaudu. FDJ did a fantastic job. He
jumped at the perfect time,” Horner said. He also credited Stefan Küng for
protecting his teammate deep into the finale: “Stefan looked after Gaudu
magnificently throughout today’s stage.”
Stage 3 underlined how small decisions can swing Grand Tour
racing. Pedersen had the legs, Vingegaard had the climbing strength, but Gaudu
had the instinct and positioning when it mattered most. As Horner summed up, “This
was a stage for Pedersen, but Lidl-Trek raced it wrong. And when you race it
wrong, a rider like Gaudu is going to take it.”
Read also
Fin MajorCycling Journalist
Fin Major is a UK-based writer at CyclingUpToDate and has been part of the team since 2024. He is the site’s main writer for FAQs and evergreen explainers and has written around 2,000 pieces for the platform. Alongside this work, he focuses on in-depth analysis and covers the biggest races on the calendar, including the Tour de France, the Giro d’Italia, and La Vuelta a España, providing clear context around performance trends, tactics, and key storylines.
In his reporting, Fin uses reputable data sources such as ProCyclingStats for results, statistics, and historical context. He places strong emphasis on careful sourcing, editorial accuracy, and updating articles promptly when new, verified information becomes available. Outside of writing, Fin is an active cyclist, which supports his practical understanding of the sport and its demands.
claps 1visitors 1
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- Are you MrMauMau 2.0? Nothing you are saying is really relevant. Vaguely connected, but irrelevant. The conversation is whether Schreiber impeded Brand or not.
Rafionain-Glas08-11-2026 - He is boring
leedorney08-11-2026 - To Twoje przemyślenia te bla, bla :)
Dariusz08-11-2026 - Uwielbiam patrzeć, jak wyjeżdża na czoło peletonu i zaczyna się rzeź...
Dariusz08-11-2026 - Yeah, unreal.
parisbound0008-11-2026 - there needs to be space in life for pointless comments!Ketterechts08-11-2026
- That is a very lazy way of putting it but so far on this website it seems like everyone is happy to look at everything lazily, even things that annoy them intensely. All they want to do is state their feeling and position but ask most to analyse a problem or come up with solutions or improvements and you’re stunned by silence. Nobody even really knows how this all happens. It’s very simple and quick to just say the UCI did it but I bet you they didn’t, I bet you not more than 2 people were involved, more likely just 1. The UCI may be ultimately responsible but it is not their decision, this is about hierarchy, power and delegation. The fact that protest is possible also means it isn’t over and that MORE people could get involved for a thorough review which could throw up anything. It is highly likely it was a sole commissar who decided and has that power in a first round. Therein might lie the problem the UCI has to consider, is it acceptable to give so much authority to one single person when it is quite possible for them to have a natural bias or be too easily susceptible to imposed bias. Who is to say an individual in this position isn’t susceptible to collaboration with outside players with interests in the results, nations, families, teams, betting companies, etc. On the one hand we have sports where these problems have been worked on way more to reduce such problems, on the other hand we have sports with far stricter and more draconian rules not even concerning safety or obstruction that nobody really questions like false starts or stepping out of lane or zones in athletics. If cycling hastowork on itself, it would be good if protagonists (all kinds) would start doing a little more than just moaning over outcomes.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- Yes, so why not make comments less pointless?Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- What a race! I didn't expect Vanthourenhout to collapse like that, and Wyseure did take the fight to Nys, but there was no doubt at the end. I also wonder what Aubin Sparfel would be capable of were he to race in the elites now. In the U23 ranks he is making good work of Giel Lejeune, who himself is among the better riders in the elites, and a top 10 contender in the big races (3rd at Kleebergcross, 8th at Berencross and 5th at Heerderstrand). In the French Cup, Sparfel is significantly better than Romain Debord (8th at Koppenbergcross and 10th at the Euros) and Rémi Lelandais (12th at Koppenbergcross and 19th at the Euros).
Rafionain-Glas08-11-2026 - There really was nothing in it. Schreiber was so much faster, and Brand was fighting to stay in the wheel in the sprint. Schreiber did move a bit, but to say she closed the door doesn't make sense because Brand couldn't enter it anyway, abd she wasn't impeded.
Rafionain-Glas08-11-2026
Loading
3 Comments










