“The only problem” – Was this the weakness that prevented both Bardet and Pinot from Tour de France glory?
Cycling
Next week’s Critérium du Dauphiné will mark the final road
race of Romain Bardet’s professional career. The Frenchman, who turned pro in
2012 and spent much of his career burdened with expectation, will say goodbye
to the peloton on Sunday 15 June atop Le Plateau du Mont-Cenis.
Just a week ago, Bardet finished the Giro d’Italia, his last
Grand Tour, where he came agonisingly close to completing a career set of stage
wins in all three major tours. But, true to the pattern of his career, it was a
near miss.
Now, has someone found out the key weakness that ultimately undid Bardet and Pinot's (as well as the entirety of France) Tour de France dreams?
Read also
As cycling journalist Hugo Coorevits told WielerFlits,
Bardet's time at the top has long been shaped by tension between immense
potential and the limits of his skillset. “The curtain falls on Sunday 15 June
on Le Plateau du Mont-Cenis in the Alps. There Romain Bardet will end a
professional career that began in 2012. It was a career that did not fully
bring what his compatriots, and he himself, had hoped for when he made his
debut in 2013 as a 22-year-old with a fifteenth place in la grande boucle.”
Coorevits recalls first encountering Bardet at the 2013
Amstel Gold Race, where the young Frenchman made a bold early break and was
only caught nine kilometres from the finish. “I walked up to him and said: ‘I
think you have a great career ahead of you with the pros.’ ‘Do you really mean
that?’ he asked shyly. I nodded in agreement.”
Read also
France believed in Bardet just as it had begun to believe in
Thibaut Pinot, his contemporary and rival. “The French media feasted on the
duel between Pinot and Bardet. They thought out loud that a variation of
Jacques Anquetil versus Raymond Poulidor was in the making,” said Coorevits.
But the comparison never truly materialised. “The only problem was that they
were both inferior time trialists.”
Tour organisers adjusted the route in response to the
climbing strengths of riders like Bardet, reducing time trial kilometres and
introducing climbing chronos. It worked, up to a point. In 2016, Bardet
finished second overall after a dramatic stage win at Saint-Gervais Mont Blanc.
A year later, he was just 23 seconds behind Chris Froome before the final time
trial in Marseille, only to collapse and lose two minutes. “Suddenly Bardet was
'on foot' and lost two minutes to Froome… He rode so dramatically bad that he
also lost second place to Rigoberto Uran.”
Read also
That stage may have been the moment the yellow jersey truly
slipped from his grasp.
By 2019, doubts were mounting. “On the eve of the Critérium
du Dauphiné in 2019, I told him during an interview: ‘Abandon that
classification. Aim for one-day races.’ He looked at me meaningfully, but
remained silent. The yoke of the Tour was starting to weigh heavily and the
expectations of the AG2R team management were becoming too high.”
Bardet’s move to Team DSM in 2021 revitalised him.
Fatherhood, COVID, and a change in scenery offered perspective that he clearly
needed. “The man with a master's degree in business management had a lot of
time to think and decided to change air after nine professional years at AG2R
La Mondiale.”
Read also
Under Iwan Spekenbrink’s management, Bardet was given
freedom. “Spekenbrink simply told him: ‘You don’t have to win. We just want to
see the best version of you. In the end, it’s just a race.’ Bardet raced freely
again. Old school. As an attacker, with a lot of racing insight.”
That freedom paid off in his final Tour de France last
summer. “On the first day of his eleventh and final Tour de France, his dream
came true. His young teammate Frank van den Broek, with whom he had escaped,
granted him the victory and the yellow jersey.”
Bardet later admitted to L’Équipe that he had never
truly felt like a Grand Tour general classification rider. “Another place in
the top ten of a grand tour gave me little satisfaction either.”
Read also
Fin MajorCycling Journalist
Fin Major is a UK-based writer at CyclingUpToDate and has been part of the team since 2024. He is the site’s main writer for FAQs and evergreen explainers and has written around 2,000 pieces for the platform. Alongside this work, he focuses on in-depth analysis and covers the biggest races on the calendar, including the Tour de France, the Giro d’Italia, and La Vuelta a España, providing clear context around performance trends, tactics, and key storylines.
In his reporting, Fin uses reputable data sources such as ProCyclingStats for results, statistics, and historical context. He places strong emphasis on careful sourcing, editorial accuracy, and updating articles promptly when new, verified information becomes available. Outside of writing, Fin is an active cyclist, which supports his practical understanding of the sport and its demands.
claps 14visitors 6
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- He should have been allowed to go to Movistar. Right now both arent a good fit for each other and are just wasting each other's time and effortabstractengineer08-11-2026
- Thibau Nys does exactly what Iserbyt is calling for
Rafionain-Glas08-11-2026 - i did not see it. was the relegation justified or an overly hard decision? and don‘t cross riders deviate from straight lines all the time? bumping into each others when they cut corners, etc … why being more strict with the rules on the finish sprint?Ketterechts08-11-2026
- seems like we are advertising the website with pointless comments…Ketterechts08-11-2026
- So?Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- The UCI do have their favorites.
Front24208-11-2026 - On a positive note, you maybe notice turning this topic into a discussion has the benefit of eliminating certain participants who do not see how they can turn it back to their sole interest ;-)Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- People see what they want to. I am actually the opposite of your accusation, probably more of a rebel than most of you who don’t get the big picture. The difference is, I don’t go moaning publicly about the consequences of my transgressions, I understand the need for rules and I take my OWN responsibility when deciding to ignore or break them or doing so involuntarily. I will also not hesitate to state my case or argue vehemently when relevant, sometimes it works, sometimes it makes things worse but that’s the price to pay for principles and having character.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- That may be but that was unknown to others and nothing says that’s the whole truth. Again, don’t try to misinterpret, it is a call and technically it is correct. Besides, even if there is a valid reason, that does not disqualify the ruling or punishment as far as the rules have been developed. I don’t think they’re as far as in football where for handball there is a distinction (in some ways and specific cases) between intentional or not. And football can be just as harsh and people live with it, eg the offside rule, also judged to within tiny fractions but often wrong or ignored. It’s the nature of every collective organisation and sometimes I wonder if our rebellion against it isn’t seated in the feelings we carry from the injustices we’ve felt personally, like being flashed driving 1km/h too fast when we are explained limits are just a security measure but we are absolutely certain not to have endangered anyone with our transgression. The problem is, nobody has better solutions and no 2 people have the same interpretation of where a limit should be.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- Because for you deviated implies the other rider MUST have been made to fall and fail to finish ??? I don’t know if you ride a bike but next time someone carves you up or drives dangerously close, just hold back from those feelings of changing something, reporting or filming or even complaining. Everyone will just say, hey you’re still here undamaged, doesn’t seem like anyone did anything.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
Loading
Write a comment











