“The biggest time gap came on the easiest climb” — João Almeida left rueing stage 9 as he leaves La Vuelta a 'proud' runner-up
Cycling
In a Vuelta a Espana where unpredictability reigned and tradition was turned on its head, João Almeida emerged as one of the most consistent — and compelling — protagonists. But for all the strength, resilience, and tactical maturity he showed over three gruelling weeks, one day continues to linger.
“The biggest time gap came, in theory, on the easiest climb,” the 27-year-old reflected post-race to Jornal A Bola. “Stage 9 was supposed to be manageable — but it turned out to be decisive.”
Indeed, it was on the comparatively benign ascent to Valdezcaray where Almeida lost 28 seconds to eventual race winner Jonas Vingegaard. While hardly a collapse, the gap would grow to define the GC battle — and prove key in denying Almeida what could have been a historic victory.
A "strange" Vuelta, shaped by stage 9
Stage 9 wasn’t marked out as a kingmaker — not on paper. But it would become the race’s fulcrum. With Team Visma | Lease a Bike executing a perfectly timed offensive and UAE Team Emirates - XRG caught out, Almeida was left isolated. The damage wasn't catastrophic, but it was enough. From that point on, he was on the back foot in the battle for red.
“We made the race hard ourselves,” Almeida said, analysing the paradox of time gaps emerging not on the Angliru or Lagos de Covadonga, but on a seemingly tame climb. “It shows it’s the riders, not the parcours, who define these races.”
That tactical honesty — paired with a refusal to apportion blame — has become a hallmark of Almeida’s evolution. No excuses, no finger-pointing. Just a rider deeply self-aware, hungry to learn, and growing in stature with every Grand Tour.
Redemption on the Angliru
Whatever was lost on stage 9 was partially redeemed in one of the most prestigious ways possible: a triumph atop the brutal Alto de Angliru. Beating Vingegaard in the final kilometre of one of cycling’s most feared climbs, Almeida took a statement victory that not only kept him in podium contention but also offered a reminder of just how far he's come.
“I think we can be really proud of what we did over these three weeks,” he said. “It was a hard Vuelta, a strange one. But we did everything we could.”
There was no final-day crescendo in Madrid — the last stage was cancelled following pro-Palestinian protests — but by then the GC narrative had already run its course. Vingegaard sealed overall victory, with Almeida in second and Britain’s Tom Pidcock rounding out the podium.
A team still learning to race for red
While UAE Team Emirates - XRG has built its Grand Tour suucess around the dominance of Tadej Pogacar, the Vuelta served as a reminder that supporting one of their other leaders — especially one in contention for the overall — remains a work in progress. Almeida was tactically astute, but not always backed by the firepower he needed when it counted most.
His isolation on stage 9 was telling. And while the Angliru stage victory showcased his individual brilliance, it also hinted at what might have been possible with stronger team control in key moments. Almeida’s comments remained diplomatic, but reading between the lines, there’s recognition that organisational sharpness, not just legs, makes the difference in winning Grand Tours.
Still, his leadership was mature and composed. He raced to win when it was possible and to defend when it was necessary. If Almeida does one day claim a Grand Tour, stage 9 of the 2025 Vuelta may be remembered not just as a missed opportunity, but as the lesson that made him unstoppable.
Kieran WoodDeputy Editor-in-Chief
Kieran Wood is a sports journalist based in Wales and has been active in journalism since 2022. He regularly contributes to DartsNews.com and CyclingUpToDate.com, where he covers professional cycling and darts. In cycling, his work includes liveblogs from major races, including the Tour de France, the Giro d’Italia, and La Vuelta a España, alongside race reports and analysis. He has also conducted interviews with professional riders.
His reporting spans the full racing calendar, from one-day classics to stage races, with a focus on accurate, real-time coverage and clear contextual analysis. For statistics, results, and historical context, he regularly uses resources such as ProCyclingStats. To support reporting on rider activity and training context where relevant, he also references Strava.
In his work, Kieran places strong emphasis on careful sourcing, editorial accuracy, and updating articles as new, verified information becomes available.
claps 0visitors 0
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- He should have been allowed to go to Movistar. Right now both arent a good fit for each other and are just wasting each other's time and effortabstractengineer08-11-2026
- Thibau Nys does exactly what Iserbyt is calling for
Rafionain-Glas08-11-2026 - i did not see it. was the relegation justified or an overly hard decision? and don‘t cross riders deviate from straight lines all the time? bumping into each others when they cut corners, etc … why being more strict with the rules on the finish sprint?Ketterechts08-11-2026
- seems like we are advertising the website with pointless comments…Ketterechts08-11-2026
- So?Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- The UCI do have their favorites.
Front24208-11-2026 - On a positive note, you maybe notice turning this topic into a discussion has the benefit of eliminating certain participants who do not see how they can turn it back to their sole interest ;-)Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- People see what they want to. I am actually the opposite of your accusation, probably more of a rebel than most of you who don’t get the big picture. The difference is, I don’t go moaning publicly about the consequences of my transgressions, I understand the need for rules and I take my OWN responsibility when deciding to ignore or break them or doing so involuntarily. I will also not hesitate to state my case or argue vehemently when relevant, sometimes it works, sometimes it makes things worse but that’s the price to pay for principles and having character.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- That may be but that was unknown to others and nothing says that’s the whole truth. Again, don’t try to misinterpret, it is a call and technically it is correct. Besides, even if there is a valid reason, that does not disqualify the ruling or punishment as far as the rules have been developed. I don’t think they’re as far as in football where for handball there is a distinction (in some ways and specific cases) between intentional or not. And football can be just as harsh and people live with it, eg the offside rule, also judged to within tiny fractions but often wrong or ignored. It’s the nature of every collective organisation and sometimes I wonder if our rebellion against it isn’t seated in the feelings we carry from the injustices we’ve felt personally, like being flashed driving 1km/h too fast when we are explained limits are just a security measure but we are absolutely certain not to have endangered anyone with our transgression. The problem is, nobody has better solutions and no 2 people have the same interpretation of where a limit should be.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- Because for you deviated implies the other rider MUST have been made to fall and fail to finish ??? I don’t know if you ride a bike but next time someone carves you up or drives dangerously close, just hold back from those feelings of changing something, reporting or filming or even complaining. Everyone will just say, hey you’re still here undamaged, doesn’t seem like anyone did anything.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
Loading
Write a comment