"Puck isn't in her best form" – De Knegt on Pieterse’s mountain bike world championship defence
Cycling
This weekend, Puck Pieterse will line up in Crans-Montana,
Switzerland, to defend her mountain bike world title. At just 23 years old, the
Dutch rider remains one of the brightest talents in cycling, though her attempt
to retain the rainbow jersey has been somewhat overshadowed by Mathieu van der
Poel’s push to add the mountain bike crown to his palmarès. Yet Pieterse’s
challenge deserves the spotlight, even if the build-up has been far from ideal.
According to Dutch national coach Gerben de Knegt,
Pieterse’s preparation has been riddled with inconsistency and frustration. He
wants to see her rise to the occasion, but his assessment of her chances
carries a note of caution.
"Let's start at the beginning: Puck isn't in her best
form," the national coach told Wielerflits. "She's frustrated by
that, and it's not nice. It's the first time in her career that she's not in
the shape she wants to be. Although I have to say she's made great strides
compared to the World Cup in Les Gets two weeks ago. The result of the Short
Race last Tuesday was a bit skewed. Technically, she wasn't as good on the rock
garden, but she always closed all the gaps. She was unlucky to be right behind
that crash, because that would ruin your race."
Too much road racing?
Read also
The Dutchwoman’s season has been disrupted by her dual focus
on the road and mountain biking, something De Knegt admits could be affecting
her performance. Her explosive starts, once a hallmark, may not be possible
this weekend.
"We're hoping, of course, that it will suddenly work
out on Saturday. I do think it's possible. That will also depend on her mental
state. She has to accept that she can't make a banging start like she normally
does and is physically the best. She'll have to race more tactically and
experience the race a bit more."
"But she's not used to that and she doesn't like it
either," he continues. "I think Puck was a bit tired at the start of
the Tour de France Femmes because she probably overdid her training to be good
there. But it could be a combination of biting off more than she can chew, because
that's what it is, of course, and then if you just overstep the mark... Well,
that's what you get."
Read also
Lessons
Despite the setbacks, De Knegt believes Pieterse has learned
valuable lessons from this difficult season. He points to her ability to analyse
herself and adapt.
"Puck is an intelligent woman. She's pretty good at
pinpointing her own weaknesses. I don't think she'll let herself be caught out
like that again. As an athlete, you're balancing on the edge of: 'If I do even
more now, will that make me even better?' Sometimes you fall over the edge,
don't you think? Earlier this week, she did tell me she's proud of herself for
what she showed in the rainbow jersey, and that she enjoyed it. But she's not
the top favorite on Saturday, let that be clear."
Part of De Knegt’s realism comes from the level of
competition. The Dutchwoman has been facing world-class rivals week after week,
and some of them look to be peaking at the right time.
Read also
"She's been competing at a very high level for weeks
now. Alessandra Keller rode a surprisingly good World Short Race Championship.
It was wonderful to see how the home crowd supported her there. Keller is
definitely on the rise. But for me, Rissveds is truly number one. She was also
sublime at the European Championships last month, and she was again in Les
Gets."
For Pieterse, the goal may not necessarily be about
repeating last year’s win, but about delivering a performance that reflects her
true level under challenging circumstances.
"If she finishes fifth, sixth, or seventh, she's simply
done very well," says De Knegt. That might sound rather cautious to the
outside world. "People will say that, but you have to be honest. But if
she does that and is competitive... I always say: if you can finish fifth, you
can also finish third – depending on the race. But two weeks ago in Les Gets,
she was really far off the winner in terms of time, albeit on a tough course.
That's why we have to be realistic."
Read also
Fin MajorCycling Journalist
Fin Major is a UK-based writer at CyclingUpToDate and has been part of the team since 2024. He is the site’s main writer for FAQs and evergreen explainers and has written around 2,000 pieces for the platform. Alongside this work, he focuses on in-depth analysis and covers the biggest races on the calendar, including the Tour de France, the Giro d’Italia, and La Vuelta a España, providing clear context around performance trends, tactics, and key storylines.
In his reporting, Fin uses reputable data sources such as ProCyclingStats for results, statistics, and historical context. He places strong emphasis on careful sourcing, editorial accuracy, and updating articles promptly when new, verified information becomes available. Outside of writing, Fin is an active cyclist, which supports his practical understanding of the sport and its demands.
claps 0visitors 0
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- Thibau Nys does exactly what Iserbyt is calling for
Rafionain-Glas08-11-2026 - i did not see it. was the relegation justified or an overly hard decision? and don‘t cross riders deviate from straight lines all the time? bumping into each others when they cut corners, etc … why being more strict with the rules on the finish sprint?Ketterechts08-11-2026
- seems like we are advertising the website with pointless comments…Ketterechts08-11-2026
- So?Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- The UCI do have their favorites.
Front24208-11-2026 - On a positive note, you maybe notice turning this topic into a discussion has the benefit of eliminating certain participants who do not see how they can turn it back to their sole interest ;-)Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- People see what they want to. I am actually the opposite of your accusation, probably more of a rebel than most of you who don’t get the big picture. The difference is, I don’t go moaning publicly about the consequences of my transgressions, I understand the need for rules and I take my OWN responsibility when deciding to ignore or break them or doing so involuntarily. I will also not hesitate to state my case or argue vehemently when relevant, sometimes it works, sometimes it makes things worse but that’s the price to pay for principles and having character.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- That may be but that was unknown to others and nothing says that’s the whole truth. Again, don’t try to misinterpret, it is a call and technically it is correct. Besides, even if there is a valid reason, that does not disqualify the ruling or punishment as far as the rules have been developed. I don’t think they’re as far as in football where for handball there is a distinction (in some ways and specific cases) between intentional or not. And football can be just as harsh and people live with it, eg the offside rule, also judged to within tiny fractions but often wrong or ignored. It’s the nature of every collective organisation and sometimes I wonder if our rebellion against it isn’t seated in the feelings we carry from the injustices we’ve felt personally, like being flashed driving 1km/h too fast when we are explained limits are just a security measure but we are absolutely certain not to have endangered anyone with our transgression. The problem is, nobody has better solutions and no 2 people have the same interpretation of where a limit should be.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- Because for you deviated implies the other rider MUST have been made to fall and fail to finish ??? I don’t know if you ride a bike but next time someone carves you up or drives dangerously close, just hold back from those feelings of changing something, reporting or filming or even complaining. Everyone will just say, hey you’re still here undamaged, doesn’t seem like anyone did anything.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- And we, what are we doing?Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
Loading
Write a comment







