Milan’s absence is not just a blow for Lidl-Trek, but one that subtly reshapes the tactical landscape of the race.
The Italian has emerged as one of the few sprinters capable of surviving a harder edition of Milano-Sanremo, with the power to stay in contention deep into the finale before delivering a decisive sprint. That profile made him a genuine contender in scenarios where the race is thinned out on the Cipressa or Poggio, but not completely broken apart.
Without Milan, the pool of riders capable of capitalising on a reduced sprint becomes noticeably smaller.
What it means for the race
In recent years, the race has increasingly been shaped by aggressive racing from riders such as Tadej Pogacar and Mathieu van der Poel, raising the intensity long before the finish.
Milan represented a rare threat in that context. If he could survive those accelerations, he would have been among the fastest riders left in contention on the Via Roma.
His withdrawal therefore, removes one of the key figures who could have benefited from a hard but not decisive race, a scenario that often sits at the centre of the modern Milano-Sanremo dynamic.
Lidl-Trek lose a clear option
For Lidl-Trek, the impact is also tactical. Without Milan, the team lose a defined sprint leader for the finale, reducing their options in how they approach the race. The absence of a clear finishing card may also influence how aggressively they commit to positioning and chasing in the closing kilometres.
While the headline battle remains centred on the sport’s biggest names, Milan’s absence quietly removes one of the more intriguing variables from the equation.
At a race often decided by the finest of margins, that shift could yet prove significant.