"Israel still have the right to participate – For Russia it was legally different": UCI boss David Lappartient gives detailed response to Vuelta protests and IPT controversy
Cycling
At the 2025 UCI World Championships in Kigali, UCI president David Lappartient has addressed questions regarding the controversy surrounding Israel - Premier Tech and the protests that disrupted the 2025 Vuelta a Espana earlier this year.
Lappartient acknowledged the human toll of the ongoing conflict in Gaza, saying in quotes collected by Cycling News: “We consider of course that what happened on October 7 was unacceptable, it was terrible, what is still happening and what happened today also in the Gaza Strip is terrible for the civilians. So we call for peace, and violence is not the solution to solve your problems.”
Yet, in discussing the Vuelta protests specifically, Lappartient emphasised the UCI’s stance on neutrality and the autonomy of sport. “We are politically neutral and we don't want to jump into the political discussions because then we can become a tool for sanction,” he said. “If we start to consider that cycling is [vulnerable to] demonstrations like this, to stop them, we are in a very weak position, because this time it's for Palestine and Gaza, the next time it will be for another topic. And then you can find many reasons to stop all bicycle races.”
Read also
Challenges of Open-Road Racing
Lappartient detailed the practical challenges posed by protests on open roads, noting that cycling events are inherently exposed: “Of course we are on open roads, it's not like we are in a stadium where you have policemen, you will remove everything from bags and so on. This is something we can't accept. But these kinds of things are not directly in our hands, because usually this is in the hands of the police in the various countries.”
On the specific issue of Israel-Premier Tech’s participation, Lappartient defended the team’s right to compete, highlighting the importance of legal and Olympic principles. “We were also very clear that they still have the right to participate. The [Spanish] government wanted me to remove the team – on which basis? First of all, on which legal basis? And the second point is it would have been a breach of Olympic values.” He warned that setting a precedent of removing teams for political reasons could lead to arbitrary exclusions in the future.

Scenes of protest marred much of the 2025 Vuelta
Distinguishing Between Cases
The UCI president drew a distinction between the handling of Israel - Premier Tech and the suspension of the Russian Olympic Committee. “For Russia it was different. The attack from the Russian government against the Ukrainian territory happened during the Olympic truce. The Olympic truce was a resolution approved by the United Nations unanimously. The Olympic charter also mentions that of course we recognise a country the way they are recognised by the international community and by the United Nations. This is today the reason why the Russian NOC is suspended, not necessarily because there is a war, but for this point.”
Addressing the ongoing fallout from protests in Spain and the pressures facing IPT from sponsors, Lappartient confirmed discussions with Sylvan Adams and the race organisers. “I also supported at the time that he can remove Israel from the jersey, I was also one to propose this in a discussion with him, and also that this was a proposal from the riders to decrease the pressure. So I will discuss with him. I will not anticipate [reveal] what we will discuss.”
While Lappartient acknowledged the political sensitivities surrounding cycling events, he reiterated the UCI’s broader philosophy: “According to the Olympic values, sport is not a tool for sanction. Sport is a tool for unity and to bring people together. We are not naive to think that there is no politics in sport. However politicisation of the sport is really a big danger. We bring people together and we are a tool for unity.”
Read also
Looking Ahead for Israel-Premier Tech
The comments come amid ongoing uncertainty over Israel - Premier Tech’s future branding, with major sponsors Premier Tech and Factor both publicly urging the team to rebrand in response to controversy generated during the Vuelta. While the team has removed Israeli insignia from jerseys and vehicles in recent races as a temporary measure, the specifics of a long-term rebrand are yet to be confirmed.
Lappartient concluded by stressing the need for realistic solutions moving forward: “I think it's important to debrief what happened, what are the solutions for next year, because we also have to be realistic. We are facing some problems for the races in Spain at least… We will have the priority to find solutions.”
Read also

Kieran WoodDeputy Editor-in-Chief
Kieran Wood is a sports journalist based in Wales and has been active in journalism since 2022. He regularly contributes to DartsNews.com and CyclingUpToDate.com, where he covers professional cycling and darts. In cycling, his work includes liveblogs from major races, including the Tour de France, the Giro d’Italia, and La Vuelta a España, alongside race reports and analysis. He has also conducted interviews with professional riders.
His reporting spans the full racing calendar, from one-day classics to stage races, with a focus on accurate, real-time coverage and clear contextual analysis. For statistics, results, and historical context, he regularly uses resources such as ProCyclingStats. To support reporting on rider activity and training context where relevant, he also references Strava.
In his work, Kieran places strong emphasis on careful sourcing, editorial accuracy, and updating articles as new, verified information becomes available.
claps 0visitors 0
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- He is boring
leedorney08-11-2026 - To Twoje przemyślenia te bla, bla :)
Dariusz08-11-2026 - Uwielbiam patrzeć, jak wyjeżdża na czoło peletonu i zaczyna się rzeź...
Dariusz08-11-2026 - Yeah, unreal.
parisbound0008-11-2026 - there needs to be space in life for pointless comments!Ketterechts08-11-2026
- That is a very lazy way of putting it but so far on this website it seems like everyone is happy to look at everything lazily, even things that annoy them intensely. All they want to do is state their feeling and position but ask most to analyse a problem or come up with solutions or improvements and you’re stunned by silence. Nobody even really knows how this all happens. It’s very simple and quick to just say the UCI did it but I bet you they didn’t, I bet you not more than 2 people were involved, more likely just 1. The UCI may be ultimately responsible but it is not their decision, this is about hierarchy, power and delegation. The fact that protest is possible also means it isn’t over and that MORE people could get involved for a thorough review which could throw up anything. It is highly likely it was a sole commissar who decided and has that power in a first round. Therein might lie the problem the UCI has to consider, is it acceptable to give so much authority to one single person when it is quite possible for them to have a natural bias or be too easily susceptible to imposed bias. Who is to say an individual in this position isn’t susceptible to collaboration with outside players with interests in the results, nations, families, teams, betting companies, etc. On the one hand we have sports where these problems have been worked on way more to reduce such problems, on the other hand we have sports with far stricter and more draconian rules not even concerning safety or obstruction that nobody really questions like false starts or stepping out of lane or zones in athletics. If cycling hastowork on itself, it would be good if protagonists (all kinds) would start doing a little more than just moaning over outcomes.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- Yes, so why not make comments less pointless?Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- What a race! I didn't expect Vanthourenhout to collapse like that, and Wyseure did take the fight to Nys, but there was no doubt at the end. I also wonder what Aubin Sparfel would be capable of were he to race in the elites now. In the U23 ranks he is making good work of Giel Lejeune, who himself is among the better riders in the elites, and a top 10 contender in the big races (3rd at Kleebergcross, 8th at Berencross and 5th at Heerderstrand). In the French Cup, Sparfel is significantly better than Romain Debord (8th at Koppenbergcross and 10th at the Euros) and Rémi Lelandais (12th at Koppenbergcross and 19th at the Euros).
Rafionain-Glas08-11-2026 - There really was nothing in it. Schreiber was so much faster, and Brand was fighting to stay in the wheel in the sprint. Schreiber did move a bit, but to say she closed the door doesn't make sense because Brand couldn't enter it anyway, abd she wasn't impeded.
Rafionain-Glas08-11-2026 - He should have been allowed to go to Movistar. Right now both arent a good fit for each other and are just wasting each other's time and effortabstractengineer08-11-2026
Loading
1 Comments









