“He kept pushing, and I dropped a bit,” he explained. “I saw behind that there were some gaps, so I tried to keep going, but then the small group behind came back, and we were there together in the end.”
Following first, then regrouping
Tiberi’s account places his decisive effort earlier than the moment the chasing group eventually formed. Rather than sitting on from the outset, the
Bahrain - Victorious rider committed to the acceleration as it happened, only regrouping once the elastic finally snapped.
“When we started the last climb, I saw that Red Bull were doing a really strong tempo,” he said. “It was clear it was for an attack. I was in position, I tried, and then I had to adjust.”
That sequence would later become part of the post-stage discussion,
after Joao Almeida suggested that greater cooperation behind might have brought Evenepoel back, adding that Tiberi appeared to be saving his legs.
Tiberi did not address that remark directly, but his description of the effort paints a picture of a rider already on the limit by the time the chase properly formed.
Hope, then reality, in the chase
Despite the difficulty of the move, there was a brief moment when the chase group believed the gap might still be manageable. “At one moment, he was maybe ten seconds in front, three hundred metres or so,” Tiberi said. “We spoke to each other and said: Come on, let’s try.”
That optimism was short lived. “He went again really fast, and suddenly it was twenty or thirty seconds,” he added. “It was just very, very fast.”
With Evenepoel riding clear and the time gap stabilising, the focus shifted to salvaging the best possible result from what remained.
In a finale shaped by explosive gradients and relentless pacing, Tiberi’s day ultimately became defined by that initial decision to commit. In the context of the broader debate that followed, his account adds crucial nuance: not a rider waiting, but one who reached his limit early, and paid for it later.