ANALYSIS: What can Tom Pidcock learn from Mathieu van der Poel ahead of his debut for Q36.5 Pro Cycling Team
Cycling
Tom Pidcock’s move from INEOS Grenadiers to the Q36.5 Pro
Cycling Team has sparked widespread debate in the cycling community, and has
been the main talking point of the winter so far. Pidcock’s immense talent has
been undeniable, yet his tenure at INEOS was fraught with challenges that
seemed to hinder his growth.
As Pidcock embarks on a new chapter, the blueprint laid down
by Mathieu van der Poel at Alpecin-Deceuninck could offer a guide for success.
Van der Poel has set a benchmark for balancing leadership, multidiscipline
dominance, and thriving as the star rider of a smaller team. Pidcock’s move to
Q36.5 may provide him with the freedom to follow a similar path, so lets take a
look at how.
Read also
Mathieu van der Poel’s blueprint
Mathieu van der Poel is already regarded as one of the
greatest multi-disciplinary riders in history. His list of achievements spans
cyclocross, road cycling, gravel, and mountain biking. With six cyclocross
World Championships, three Tour of Flanders victories, two Paris-Roubaix triumph,
and world titles both on the road and gravel, van der Poel’s versatility and
consistency have redefined modern cycling.
Van der Poel’s importance to Alpecin-Deceuninck cannot be
overstated. As teammate Jasper Philipsen observed, “He’s an inspiration to
everyone in our team.” Van der Poel’s presence elevates the morale and
performance of his teammates while maintaining his own dominance across
disciplines. Remember, aside from van der Poel’s personal accolades, he has
spent the past three editions of the Tour de France delivering Jasper Philipsen
to sprint victory after sprint victory. His ability to focus on his strengths,
balance his race schedule, and deliver in marquee events has solidified his
status as a generational talent.
Read also
While van der Poel’s collection of rainbow jerseys is
extensive, the mountain biking title remains elusive. This missing piece is
something he might target in 2025, setting up a potential showdown with
Pidcock, who claimed the mountain bike World Championship in 2023 and has
already won Olympic mountain biking gold twice. Van der Poel’s desire to
conquer this discipline, as well as his ambition to compete in the 2028 Olympic
mountain bike event, underscores his relentless pursuit of excellence. Let’s
hope we don’t have to wait too much longer for a showdown between van der Poel
and Pidcock on mountain bikes.
What went wrong for Pidcock at INEOS?
At INEOS Grenadiers, Pidcock was surrounded by some exceptionally
talented riders, making it difficult for him to emerge as the clear leader. The
team’s structure, built around grand tour dominance and collective strength,
left little room for Pidcock’s unique personality and ambitions to flourish. As
Pidcock himself noted, “That team was like a second family to me,” but the
environment ultimately stifled his potential.
Read also
Pidcock’s character and style clashed with the more rigid
approach of INEOS. Known for his flair and unpredictable riding style, he found
it challenging to navigate a team where roles were often predetermined. While
Pidcock achieved notable successes, including a stunning solo victory on Alpe
d’Huez during the 2022 Tour de France, these moments were overshadowed by a
sense of unfulfilled promise. The move to Q36.5 Pro Cycling Team represents an
opportunity to escape the constraints of a large, hierarchical team and assume
a leadership role akin to van der Poel’s at Alpecin-Deceuninck.
Pidcock was never truly able to kick on from his stage win
at the 2022 Tour, and in 2023 he had a failed attempt at riding for the GC
where he was ultimately usurped by Carlos Rodriguez. Whilst he nearly won the
gravel stage at last year’s edition of the race, a man of Pidcock’s talent
should not be a ‘nearly’ man.

Pidcock struggled to kick on from his incredible stage win at the 2022 Tour de France
Van der Poel’s success at Alpecin-Deceuninck highlights the
advantages of being the undisputed leader of a smaller team. Unlike INEOS,
which operates with a collective approach, Alpecin-Deceuninck has tailored its
strategy around van der Poel. This setup has allowed him to focus on his goals
without the distractions of competing for leadership. But, Van der Poel has
also done his bit for the team, and Pidcock still won’t be able to ride solely
for his own goals, he has to find a way to lead as well.
Pidcock’s move to Q36.5 offers a similar opportunity to his
Dutch rival. As the star rider, he will have the freedom to shape his race
calendar, focus on his preferred disciplines, and build a team dynamic centred
around his strengths. This level of autonomy could unlock the potential that
was only glimpsed during his time at INEOS, and that’s something all fans of
the sport want to see.
Read also
Both Pidcock and van der Poel thrive on competing across
disciplines, a rare trait in modern cycling. Pidcock’s mountain biking talent,
highlighted by his two Olympic gold medals and the 2023 World Championship
title, is a key differentiator. In contrast, van der Poel’s dominance in the
classics road racing and cyclocross has set him apart. The prospect of these
two riders clashing in mountain biking events, such as the 2025 World
Championships, adds another layer of intrigue to their rivalry.
For Pidcock, maintaining his success across disciplines will
be crucial. Van der Poel has shown that it is possible to excel in multiple
areas without sacrificing performance, however, achieving this balance requires
meticulous planning and a team structure that supports such ambitions. Q36.5’s
willingness to back Pidcock in his multidiscipline pursuits will be a
significant factor in his success.
Read also
Van der Poel’s career has not been without challenges. His
disappointing crash at the 2021 Olympic mountain biking event and occasional
struggles in grand tours, in particular during the 2022 Tour de France, have
tested his resilience. However, van der Poel has consistently bounced back,
using these setbacks as motivation to improve, and he seems to get better and
better every year.
Pidcock’s experience at INEOS can be seen in a similar
light. While his time there may not have lived up to expectations, it provided
valuable lessons about navigating the complexities of professional cycling. The
key for Pidcock will be to channel these experiences into his new role at
Q36.5, using them as a foundation for growth.
Can Pidcock be great?
Despite the challenges, Pidcock’s talent is undeniable. His
ability to excel in high-pressure situations, combined with his unbelievable
skills on the bike, makes him one of the most exciting riders of his
generation. The move to Q36.5 represents a fresh start and an opportunity to
realise his full potential.
Read also
Van der Poel’s achievements demonstrate what is possible
when a rider’s talent is harnessed effectively. Pidcock has all the tools to
follow a similar trajectory. With the right support and a clear vision, he
could become a dominant force across disciplines, and we hope to see more of
Pidcock in the mix with the likes of Van der Poel and Wout van Aert in the
years to come.
It’s also important to emphasise the Pidcock and Q36.5 need
to quickly come to a conclusion about what Pidcock wants to be as a rider. Yes,
he’s super talented, but is he a grand tour rider? That remains to be seen, and
many believe that his talent is more suited to try to turn himself into a rider
like Van der Poel or Van Aert on the road. I guess that presents the question,
does Pidcock have more of a chance going up against Van der Poel and Van Aert
in stages and classics, or against Tadej Pogacar and Jonas Vingegaard in the
general classification of grand tours?
Read also
So, Tom Pidcock’s move to Q36.5 Pro Cycling Team marks a
pivotal moment in his career. By studying Mathieu van der Poel’s blueprint for
success, Pidcock can position himself as the star leader of a smaller team,
leveraging his talent and versatility to achieve greatness, and to fulfil his
potential. While the challenges of his time at INEOS have left unanswered
questions, they have also provided valuable lessons that could shape his
future.
Van der Poel’s status as arguably the best
multi-disciplinary rider of all time sets a high standard, but Pidcock has
shown that he has the potential to reach similar heights. As he embarks on this
new chapter, the cycling world will be watching closely to see if Pidcock can
fulfil his promise and find his own way to the pinnacle of professional
cycling.
Fin MajorCycling Journalist
Fin Major is a UK-based writer at CyclingUpToDate and has been part of the team since 2024. He is the site’s main writer for FAQs and evergreen explainers and has written around 2,000 pieces for the platform. Alongside this work, he focuses on in-depth analysis and covers the biggest races on the calendar, including the Tour de France, the Giro d’Italia, and La Vuelta a España, providing clear context around performance trends, tactics, and key storylines.
In his reporting, Fin uses reputable data sources such as ProCyclingStats for results, statistics, and historical context. He places strong emphasis on careful sourcing, editorial accuracy, and updating articles promptly when new, verified information becomes available. Outside of writing, Fin is an active cyclist, which supports his practical understanding of the sport and its demands.
claps 0visitors 0
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- Thibau Nys does exactly what Iserbyt is calling for
Rafionain-Glas08-11-2026 - i did not see it. was the relegation justified or an overly hard decision? and don‘t cross riders deviate from straight lines all the time? bumping into each others when they cut corners, etc … why being more strict with the rules on the finish sprint?Ketterechts08-11-2026
- seems like we are advertising the website with pointless comments…Ketterechts08-11-2026
- So?Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- The UCI do have their favorites.
Front24208-11-2026 - On a positive note, you maybe notice turning this topic into a discussion has the benefit of eliminating certain participants who do not see how they can turn it back to their sole interest ;-)Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- People see what they want to. I am actually the opposite of your accusation, probably more of a rebel than most of you who don’t get the big picture. The difference is, I don’t go moaning publicly about the consequences of my transgressions, I understand the need for rules and I take my OWN responsibility when deciding to ignore or break them or doing so involuntarily. I will also not hesitate to state my case or argue vehemently when relevant, sometimes it works, sometimes it makes things worse but that’s the price to pay for principles and having character.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- That may be but that was unknown to others and nothing says that’s the whole truth. Again, don’t try to misinterpret, it is a call and technically it is correct. Besides, even if there is a valid reason, that does not disqualify the ruling or punishment as far as the rules have been developed. I don’t think they’re as far as in football where for handball there is a distinction (in some ways and specific cases) between intentional or not. And football can be just as harsh and people live with it, eg the offside rule, also judged to within tiny fractions but often wrong or ignored. It’s the nature of every collective organisation and sometimes I wonder if our rebellion against it isn’t seated in the feelings we carry from the injustices we’ve felt personally, like being flashed driving 1km/h too fast when we are explained limits are just a security measure but we are absolutely certain not to have endangered anyone with our transgression. The problem is, nobody has better solutions and no 2 people have the same interpretation of where a limit should be.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- Because for you deviated implies the other rider MUST have been made to fall and fail to finish ??? I don’t know if you ride a bike but next time someone carves you up or drives dangerously close, just hold back from those feelings of changing something, reporting or filming or even complaining. Everyone will just say, hey you’re still here undamaged, doesn’t seem like anyone did anything.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- And we, what are we doing?Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
Loading
Write a comment











