Tiesj Benoot on Visma's tactical catastrophe: "I just really wanted to see him win, but it was a stupid decision"
Cycling
Tiesj Benoot showed his best legs of the season today at Dwars door Vlaanderen where Team Visma | Lease a Bike collectively attacked and made the difference to all but one rider. But then his form wasn't utilized in the best form and after the team lost the race to Neilson Powless in surprising fashion, Visma is left licking it's psychological wounds. Benoot explains what happened through his point of view.
“I think we are doing a good race, it was the first time in these classics that we were able to execute our plan. Almost perfectly. In the last lap we all wanted Wout to win after what happened last year," Benoot admitted in an interview with Wielerflits. The idea was very simple, carry the race to a sprint where on paper he would be the main favourite.
Instead of attacking, Benoot and Jorgenson burnt themselves working, although the chasing groups were still distant in the final kilometers. “We took it a bit too easy. In retrospect, we should have attacked Neilson in the last five kilometers. Before that, it was still too risky, given that the pursuers were not that far behind us. We wanted Wout to want us so badly that we took too many risks to take Neilson with us.”
Read also
“Why that decision? It grew of course. Matteo won last year and I just spent a long time with Wout in Tenerife. I wanted him to win more than I did," the Belgian admits. "I just really wanted to see him win, but it was a stupid decision. All credit to Neilson. He was very strong and rode a lot. We just should have put him under pressure a lot more.”
In the end, a cramped van Aert didn't have the power to beat the American. Benoot crossed the line in third place. “We were finally able to race the way we like to do. We were looking for that for a while in the classics, but today we succeeded. We deserved to finish it and be able to say that we are collectively very strong across the board," he concluded.
Read also
🇧🇪 #DDV25
— Team Visma | Lease a Bike (@vismaleaseabike) April 2, 2025
“𝐅𝐚𝐥𝐥 𝐝𝐨𝐰𝐧 𝐬𝐞𝐯𝐞𝐧 𝐭𝐢𝐦𝐞𝐬, 𝐬𝐭𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐮𝐩 𝐞𝐢𝐠𝐡𝐭!” 💯
Not the end we all hoped for, but what a 𝐭𝐞𝐚𝐦 𝐞𝐟𝐟𝐨𝐫𝐭 in Dwars door Vlaanderen. You guys should be very proud of the way you raced today: as a team for the victory. 🐝
Some great… pic.twitter.com/G8mg1DPnBf

Rúben SilvaEditor-in-Chief
A founding contributor to CyclingUpToDate since its launch in January 2022, Ruben Silva has played a central role in shaping the site’s editorial direction and long-term growth. Before joining the project, he built his experience through independent blogging at Echelons Hub and by producing race previews for Ciclismo Internacional, developing a strong analytical voice rooted in daily engagement with professional cycling.
Beyond editorial work, he has been closely involved in the expansion and coordination of CyclingUpToDate’s wider network, helping establish and support sister platforms across multiple languages. This includes ongoing collaboration with CiclismoAlDia (Spanish), CiclismoAtual (Portuguese), WielrennenUpToDate (Dutch), and RadsportAktuell (German), contributing to a shared editorial vision and consistent international coverage.
He also helps oversee editorial governance across the network, setting standards for accuracy and consistency and coordinating updates or corrections when needed.
Originally from the Porto metropolitan area in Portugal, he holds a bachelor’s degree in Geography. His path into cycling journalism was shaped not through formal media training, but through independent reporting, community engagement, and sustained on-the-ground involvement in the sport.
Over the course of his career, he has conducted approximately 100 interviews across road cycling and cyclocross, ranging from one-to-one conversations and online formats to press conferences and on-site pre- and post-race coverage. His interviews include leading riders, team managers, and prominent figures within cycling media: Tadej Pogacar, Jonas Vingegaard, Mathieu van der Poel, Primoz Roglic, Wout van Aert, Joao Almeida and Tom Pidcock; managers like Patrick Lefevere and Joxean Matxin; and YouTube personality Bryan Kennedy (BKXC)...
Within 18 months of launch, he helped grow CyclingUpToDate’s English-language platform into one of the most-read cycling news websites, built entirely from the ground up. As both a professional journalist and lifelong cycling enthusiast, his focus remains on delivering accurate, timely, and well-contextualized coverage.
claps 0visitors 0
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- He should have been allowed to go to Movistar. Right now both arent a good fit for each other and are just wasting each other's time and effortabstractengineer08-11-2026
- Thibau Nys does exactly what Iserbyt is calling for
Rafionain-Glas08-11-2026 - i did not see it. was the relegation justified or an overly hard decision? and don‘t cross riders deviate from straight lines all the time? bumping into each others when they cut corners, etc … why being more strict with the rules on the finish sprint?Ketterechts08-11-2026
- seems like we are advertising the website with pointless comments…Ketterechts08-11-2026
- So?Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- The UCI do have their favorites.
Front24208-11-2026 - On a positive note, you maybe notice turning this topic into a discussion has the benefit of eliminating certain participants who do not see how they can turn it back to their sole interest ;-)Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- People see what they want to. I am actually the opposite of your accusation, probably more of a rebel than most of you who don’t get the big picture. The difference is, I don’t go moaning publicly about the consequences of my transgressions, I understand the need for rules and I take my OWN responsibility when deciding to ignore or break them or doing so involuntarily. I will also not hesitate to state my case or argue vehemently when relevant, sometimes it works, sometimes it makes things worse but that’s the price to pay for principles and having character.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- That may be but that was unknown to others and nothing says that’s the whole truth. Again, don’t try to misinterpret, it is a call and technically it is correct. Besides, even if there is a valid reason, that does not disqualify the ruling or punishment as far as the rules have been developed. I don’t think they’re as far as in football where for handball there is a distinction (in some ways and specific cases) between intentional or not. And football can be just as harsh and people live with it, eg the offside rule, also judged to within tiny fractions but often wrong or ignored. It’s the nature of every collective organisation and sometimes I wonder if our rebellion against it isn’t seated in the feelings we carry from the injustices we’ve felt personally, like being flashed driving 1km/h too fast when we are explained limits are just a security measure but we are absolutely certain not to have endangered anyone with our transgression. The problem is, nobody has better solutions and no 2 people have the same interpretation of where a limit should be.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- Because for you deviated implies the other rider MUST have been made to fall and fail to finish ??? I don’t know if you ride a bike but next time someone carves you up or drives dangerously close, just hold back from those feelings of changing something, reporting or filming or even complaining. Everyone will just say, hey you’re still here undamaged, doesn’t seem like anyone did anything.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
Loading
Write a comment








