Remco Evenepoel eyes time-trial victory at Dauphine but recognizes rivals: "Tarling and Roglic are in shape"
Cycling
This Wednesday will see a very important day for the GC riders at the Criterium du Dauphiné. Before hitting the mountains, the big contenders for the yellow jersey will go face-to-face on a hilly 34-kilometer time-trial that will certainly open things up significantly ahead of the mountains. Remco Evenepoel tells what he expects out of stage 4.
“It will be very important for me. Especially to see how the shoulder is doing, how it reacts and functions. Because it will be an effort of almost three quarters of an hour," Evenepoel shared in an interview with Het Nieuwsblad. "It will be important to pace well, because it is a fairly long time trial, which starts flat but starts to go uphill after 15 kilometers. I will have to save something for the last part, but it is certainly a profile that suits me. I am really looking forward to it. It is the stage that interests me the most."
Read also
Evenepoel crashed and was fourth in the small time-trial at Itzulia Basque Country earlier this spring; and won the time-trial at the Volta ao Algarve. The Belgian starts his effort as one of the main favourites but faces European Champion Joshua Tarling, as well as GC rivals Primoz Roglic and Juan Ayuso - all very realistic winners for the day.
"Gosh. Tarling and Roglic are in shape... I am going for the podium, that would be nice. In any case, it will give a good indication of my shape for the shorter efforts, which is important with a view to the first time trial in the Tour," the Belgian says. "But whatever the result, we will only be able to draw conclusions after the event.”
Read also
Evenepoel's aim is to test his legs following two months away from racing, and building the perfect form into the Tour de France. Hence, he is not overly tense for today's stage, although a victory could come as a highly motivating factor ahead of July - and should also result in a yellow jersey.
“If everything goes perfectly, he would have started that time trial with one ambition: to win," team DS Klaas Lodewyck adds. "If you lose, you are disappointed. But because of his training deficit after his crash in the Basque Country, this time the good feeling is more important. He has to be able to get off the bike and decide for himself: it is good. But this test is not all-determining for what he can do this weekend, for example.”
Read also

Rúben SilvaEditor-in-Chief
A founding contributor to CyclingUpToDate since its launch in January 2022, Ruben Silva has played a central role in shaping the site’s editorial direction and long-term growth. Before joining the project, he built his experience through independent blogging at Echelons Hub and by producing race previews for Ciclismo Internacional, developing a strong analytical voice rooted in daily engagement with professional cycling.
Beyond editorial work, he has been closely involved in the expansion and coordination of CyclingUpToDate’s wider network, helping establish and support sister platforms across multiple languages. This includes ongoing collaboration with CiclismoAlDia (Spanish), CiclismoAtual (Portuguese), WielrennenUpToDate (Dutch), and RadsportAktuell (German), contributing to a shared editorial vision and consistent international coverage.
He also helps oversee editorial governance across the network, setting standards for accuracy and consistency and coordinating updates or corrections when needed.
Originally from the Porto metropolitan area in Portugal, he holds a bachelor’s degree in Geography. His path into cycling journalism was shaped not through formal media training, but through independent reporting, community engagement, and sustained on-the-ground involvement in the sport.
Over the course of his career, he has conducted approximately 100 interviews across road cycling and cyclocross, ranging from one-to-one conversations and online formats to press conferences and on-site pre- and post-race coverage. His interviews include leading riders, team managers, and prominent figures within cycling media: Tadej Pogacar, Jonas Vingegaard, Mathieu van der Poel, Primoz Roglic, Wout van Aert, Joao Almeida and Tom Pidcock; managers like Patrick Lefevere and Joxean Matxin; and YouTube personality Bryan Kennedy (BKXC)...
Within 18 months of launch, he helped grow CyclingUpToDate’s English-language platform into one of the most-read cycling news websites, built entirely from the ground up. As both a professional journalist and lifelong cycling enthusiast, his focus remains on delivering accurate, timely, and well-contextualized coverage.
claps 3visitors 3
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- Are you MrMauMau 2.0? Nothing you are saying is really relevant. Vaguely connected, but irrelevant. The conversation is whether Schreiber impeded Brand or not.
Rafionain-Glas08-11-2026 - He is boring
leedorney08-11-2026 - To Twoje przemyślenia te bla, bla :)
Dariusz08-11-2026 - Uwielbiam patrzeć, jak wyjeżdża na czoło peletonu i zaczyna się rzeź...
Dariusz08-11-2026 - Yeah, unreal.
parisbound0008-11-2026 - there needs to be space in life for pointless comments!Ketterechts08-11-2026
- That is a very lazy way of putting it but so far on this website it seems like everyone is happy to look at everything lazily, even things that annoy them intensely. All they want to do is state their feeling and position but ask most to analyse a problem or come up with solutions or improvements and you’re stunned by silence. Nobody even really knows how this all happens. It’s very simple and quick to just say the UCI did it but I bet you they didn’t, I bet you not more than 2 people were involved, more likely just 1. The UCI may be ultimately responsible but it is not their decision, this is about hierarchy, power and delegation. The fact that protest is possible also means it isn’t over and that MORE people could get involved for a thorough review which could throw up anything. It is highly likely it was a sole commissar who decided and has that power in a first round. Therein might lie the problem the UCI has to consider, is it acceptable to give so much authority to one single person when it is quite possible for them to have a natural bias or be too easily susceptible to imposed bias. Who is to say an individual in this position isn’t susceptible to collaboration with outside players with interests in the results, nations, families, teams, betting companies, etc. On the one hand we have sports where these problems have been worked on way more to reduce such problems, on the other hand we have sports with far stricter and more draconian rules not even concerning safety or obstruction that nobody really questions like false starts or stepping out of lane or zones in athletics. If cycling hastowork on itself, it would be good if protagonists (all kinds) would start doing a little more than just moaning over outcomes.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- Yes, so why not make comments less pointless?Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- What a race! I didn't expect Vanthourenhout to collapse like that, and Wyseure did take the fight to Nys, but there was no doubt at the end. I also wonder what Aubin Sparfel would be capable of were he to race in the elites now. In the U23 ranks he is making good work of Giel Lejeune, who himself is among the better riders in the elites, and a top 10 contender in the big races (3rd at Kleebergcross, 8th at Berencross and 5th at Heerderstrand). In the French Cup, Sparfel is significantly better than Romain Debord (8th at Koppenbergcross and 10th at the Euros) and Rémi Lelandais (12th at Koppenbergcross and 19th at the Euros).
Rafionain-Glas08-11-2026 - There really was nothing in it. Schreiber was so much faster, and Brand was fighting to stay in the wheel in the sprint. Schreiber did move a bit, but to say she closed the door doesn't make sense because Brand couldn't enter it anyway, abd she wasn't impeded.
Rafionain-Glas08-11-2026
Loading
Focus on the ITT now 💪 #Dauphine
Write a comment









