Pogacar would have won the Tour if not for "Superman" Wout van Aert according to former UAE staff member Aart Vierhouten
Cycling
After Jonas Vingegaard's stunning dethroning of Tadej Pogacar at the 2022 Tour de France, Aart Vierhouten, a former member of UAE Team Emirates support car, has described the Dane's teammate, Wout van Aert as "Superman."
Looking back at the race, Vierhouten describes how Jumbo-Visma were ultimately handed a massive stroke of luck when Primoz Roglic suffered a fall. "They were actually lucky that Roglic fell, so in that stage they could do nothing but choose Jonas as the first leader,” says the 52-year-old former rider. “If they had postponed that choice, it would have played into our hands.”
Read also
Vierhouten, who has since left UAE Team Emirates to become team manager at Q36.5 in the coming year, believes another stroke of luck Jumbo-Visma benefited from was the fact that Wout van Aert switched concentration from stage wins to helping Vingegaard after securing his points classification victory.
"Tadej was good, but we were unlucky to meet a superman that day who went by the name of Wout van Aert . He took the lead ahead of Vingegaard and closed a gap of two minutes on Pogacar in the last twenty kilometers,” Vierhouten said of the fifth stage where the Dane had mechanical issues and didn't lose time following van Aert's work to bring him back to the peloton.
Read also
“Had Van Aert been in the leading group with Pogacar, Jumbo-Visma would not have known what to do: let Wout wait or try to win the stage? Then we would have won the Tour there. Because without Van Aert, Vingegaard would have fallen behind Pogacar, which he could never have made up for in the mountain stages," Vierhouten believes.
The differences were eventually made on stage 11, but van Aert continued to be instrumental in the team's yellow dream, frequently taking part in breakaways which eventually kept Vingegaard safe with teammates ahead, demotivating Pogacar to attack.
Furthermore, on the summit finish to Hautacam van Aert did a massive pull in the front launching the yellow jersey into victory, before he himself won the final time-trial in green.
Read also
Kieran WoodDeputy Editor-in-Chief
Kieran Wood is a sports journalist based in Wales and has been active in journalism since 2022. He regularly contributes to DartsNews.com and CyclingUpToDate.com, where he covers professional cycling and darts. In cycling, his work includes liveblogs from major races, including the Tour de France, the Giro d’Italia, and La Vuelta a España, alongside race reports and analysis. He has also conducted interviews with professional riders.
His reporting spans the full racing calendar, from one-day classics to stage races, with a focus on accurate, real-time coverage and clear contextual analysis. For statistics, results, and historical context, he regularly uses resources such as ProCyclingStats. To support reporting on rider activity and training context where relevant, he also references Strava.
In his work, Kieran places strong emphasis on careful sourcing, editorial accuracy, and updating articles as new, verified information becomes available.
claps 0visitors 0
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- Thibau Nys does exactly what Iserbyt is calling for
Rafionain-Glas08-11-2026 - i did not see it. was the relegation justified or an overly hard decision? and don‘t cross riders deviate from straight lines all the time? bumping into each others when they cut corners, etc … why being more strict with the rules on the finish sprint?Ketterechts08-11-2026
- seems like we are advertising the website with pointless comments…Ketterechts08-11-2026
- So?Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- The UCI do have their favorites.
Front24208-11-2026 - On a positive note, you maybe notice turning this topic into a discussion has the benefit of eliminating certain participants who do not see how they can turn it back to their sole interest ;-)Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- People see what they want to. I am actually the opposite of your accusation, probably more of a rebel than most of you who don’t get the big picture. The difference is, I don’t go moaning publicly about the consequences of my transgressions, I understand the need for rules and I take my OWN responsibility when deciding to ignore or break them or doing so involuntarily. I will also not hesitate to state my case or argue vehemently when relevant, sometimes it works, sometimes it makes things worse but that’s the price to pay for principles and having character.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- That may be but that was unknown to others and nothing says that’s the whole truth. Again, don’t try to misinterpret, it is a call and technically it is correct. Besides, even if there is a valid reason, that does not disqualify the ruling or punishment as far as the rules have been developed. I don’t think they’re as far as in football where for handball there is a distinction (in some ways and specific cases) between intentional or not. And football can be just as harsh and people live with it, eg the offside rule, also judged to within tiny fractions but often wrong or ignored. It’s the nature of every collective organisation and sometimes I wonder if our rebellion against it isn’t seated in the feelings we carry from the injustices we’ve felt personally, like being flashed driving 1km/h too fast when we are explained limits are just a security measure but we are absolutely certain not to have endangered anyone with our transgression. The problem is, nobody has better solutions and no 2 people have the same interpretation of where a limit should be.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- Because for you deviated implies the other rider MUST have been made to fall and fail to finish ??? I don’t know if you ride a bike but next time someone carves you up or drives dangerously close, just hold back from those feelings of changing something, reporting or filming or even complaining. Everyone will just say, hey you’re still here undamaged, doesn’t seem like anyone did anything.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- And we, what are we doing?Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
Loading
1 Comments