The remarks reflect growing unease within the sport after demonstrations disrupted no fewer than eight Vuelta stages. While the
UCI eventually condemned the protests as “a serious breach of the Olympic Charter and the fundamental principles of sport,” Rasmussen believes cycling’s governing body was too slow to act. “From an official standpoint, some people have stuck their heads in the sand. I think, for instance, that the UCI has been enormously passive throughout this saga,” he argued.
If the UCI was sluggish, the Spanish government was the opposite. Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez went as far as praising the demonstrators, calling Spain “a role model and a source of pride” for its defence of human rights.
That stance sparked fury from Madrid’s mayor, José Luis Martínez-Almeida, who accused Sánchez of encouraging violence — and Rasmussen has echoed the criticism. “It’s catastrophic to incite and even praise the demonstrators for their actions,” he said.
Michal Kwiatkowski has already voiced fears that cycling could be exploited as a protest stage, with serious sporting consequences. Rasmussen shares that concern, though he admits a fully ticketed, closed-arena model is unrealistic given that grand tours run through towns and cities.
Still, with political tensions simmering and the memory of the Vuelta disruptions still raw, the question is no longer whether cycling will need to rethink its open-access model — but how far organisers will be forced to go.