O Gran Camino director crticizes the current UCI points system: "It's wrong, absurd, indefensible and outrageously disproportionate"
Cycling
The UCI ranking has been ever prominent since the introduction of three-year rotations of WT licences. For many teams, scoring ton of UCI points at 1.1 one-day races has become the main mean of survival in the cycling's top division. An unpleasant side effect of this change is that teams are being driven away from small stage races, such as O Gran Camino.
"O Gran Camino is a project that has a context, a package and arguments that allow us to cross the border into Portugal and have the support of institutions and large companies. And they support us because this is a stage race and not a classic," race director Ezequiel Mosquera began before delving into the heart of the problem.
There are only three WT and eight PRT teams at the start of this year's O Gran Camino. Not bad numbers for a 2.1 stage race, you'd think? But bear in mind that there is no other racing whole week besides the Opening weekend in Belgium and two one-day races over in France. So where are all the other big teams? It seems they all did their maths homework and came to a conclusion that five days of racing with an unpredictable outcome for a couple UCI points isn't worth the trouble...
"They ask me 'Why don’t you organize 5 classics?' I don’t want to do it. Because I have on my hands a stage race with a weight, a size and a capacity for growth greater than any other classic of the same level," Mosquera is fond of his project.
"So, as we are now, even though this is a well-organized, well-groomed and well-designed 5-day race, we can’t do more than we already do, at least with our means. Why? Because in five days we put 710 points up for grabs against the 3000 we could give if we managed 5 classics," he outlines the clear limitations of the current points distribution.
"The system is wrong, absurd, indefensible and outrageously disproportionate. Because it cannot be that Jonas Vingegaard comes here, wins three difficult stages and the general classification and gets the same points as the runner-up in the Clasica de Almeria," continued Mosquera.
The contrast couldn't be clearer when compared to last week's 2.Pro Vuelta a Andalucia with 6 WT and 10 PRT teams that participated in the 5-day stage race that came to a wrap just three days before the start Gran Camino. Mosquera is of the opinion that UCI needs to motivate riders to participate in multi-stage events with appropriate UCI points payout.
According to the organiser, it is outrageous that winning a 1.1 race is almost as valuable as a Grand Tour stage. "I speak in defense of stage races. I have nothing against classics but we are a country of multi-day races. It cannot be that a classic gives more points than a stage of the Vuelta a España."
"The fundamental axis around which the world of cycling revolved is changing. We have reached the point where teams configure their calendar not based on the races they are interested in, but on the basis of those that guarantee the most points."
And the worst thing for the people who try to build entertaining stage races is that general public won't even emphasize the arising problem, hidden behind the facade of dramatic relegation battles, action-packed classics, and whatnot. "Most people don't know all these dynamics, these abysmal differences in points, well... you have to tell them. You have to tell them that there is a problem. A structural problem that is changing the foundations of cycling."
Just in
Subscribe to our Daily Newsletter today!
Popular news
Latest comments
- Yeah, looks slow up there.Jumpyjohn28-03-2025
- lol His aim was well off! MVP was well past him before the guy decided to spit.Cyclingsbestfan28-03-2025
- But you know that’s what makes this website live ;-)Mistermaumau28-03-2025
- I hope he stays upright too and I hope that in this years Paris Roubaix we get a proper good old fashioned man against man race. Can't wait!Cyclingsbestfan28-03-2025
- What can you expect from a guy like that. Probably home now enjoying his pseudo fame before his evening session of paid sex chatting.Mistermaumau28-03-2025
- There is a lot of wisdom in some of our older people and some have the wisdom to use it wisely. Others not so much.......Cyclingsbestfan28-03-2025
- I loved De Vlaeminck back in the day, but I have to agree with him: he probably is a little burned out. I don't see him winning much this year.
Barney28-03-2025 - Tadej is 26 year old, Mr. Sour. And now, as you said, because the money, the cycling is extremely professionalized and competitive: winning is very hard, even for very talented riders.
maria2024202428-03-2025 - How many grand tours did Vlaeminck enter/finish let alone win? This article gives "old man yells at cloud" vibesPedalmasher28-03-2025
- I think Hinault is right: Pogacar is the first rider since he and Merckx who can win such a wide variety of races with such audacity and verve. I hope by the time he is done, Pog is widely acknowledged at the greatest of all time. Unlike Merckx and Hinault who were (probably necessarily in their era) pretty unpleasant characters, Pog is a cool, refreshingly humble guy who routinely thanks his teammates after they've taken their last bleedout pull for the day, gives bottles to little kids in the middle of a solo breakaway, walks around and congratulates his competitors at the finish, win or lose. There will always be those within the peloton and fanbase who resent his success, but he seems genuinely well-liked. He seems like the antidote to past other dominant champions who still inspire bitterness or disappointment. That said, Paris-Roubaix is a race that is both dangerous and requires a lot of specialized experience. I hope he stays upright.Barney28-03-2025