"Maybe I went a bit too far but it was the truth. If you don't perform for two years..." - Patrick Lefevere reflects on his controversial treatment of Julian Alaphilippe
Cycling
Marking the end of an era, neither Patrick Lefevere nor Julian Alaphilippe are part of the Soudal - Quick-Step team in 2025. For Lefevere, retirement has seen him end his time at the team's boss, whilst Alaphilippe has taken on a new challenge at the Tudor Pro Cycling Team.
Although over the course of their years working alongside each other there were many, notable successes, over the last few years the relationship between team boss and star rider soured quite dramatically. As Alaphilippe struggled to hit the kind of form that saw him win the Rainbow Jersey in 2020 and 2021, Lefevere grew more and more frustrated, using his columns in the Belgian press to repeatedly hit out publicly at the disappointing form of the French star.
Understandably, not all were impressed by this somewhat old-fashioned method of lambasting riders to improve overall performance. On the Speed On Wheels podcast of former Soudal - Quick-Step rider Niki Terpstra, however, Lefevere has not reflected on the methods he used and his controversial treatment of Alaphilippe over their latter years working together.
Read also
"Maybe I went a bit too far in that, but it was the truth," begins the outspoken Belgian's reflections on the matter. "But you can't say the truth. Julian was paid very well, really very well. Then I think - when you really don't perform for two years and you know what's going on outside the race - you have to say something about it."
"I then demanded that his wife (former cyclist and current Tour de France Femmes director Marion Rousse, ed.) and manager come. I said: if this happens again, I'll just stick you to the wall. He did his best after that, but it didn't work out," continues Lefevere. "At the time, I told his manager: I'm not an idiot, let's sit down at the table. I'll give him a contract for one more year, but then the price has to be reduced. He didn't want that and then it stops.”
Nevertheless, Lefevere mainly recalls his time with Alaphilippe very fondly. "Mind you, I was also a fan of Julian. I discovered him with Johan Molly and watched him grow as a rider. Then you give him a three-year contract for a lot of money. Based on his performance, he was worth it. Only, it didn't work out anymore," he adds. "Did it hurt? Yes, because you know: I pay so much, but it doesn't come out. With some of the money I could have attracted another rider. You have to be clear anyway. If you spend so much on a rider, you can't buy another rider. At a certain point you do find yourself counting down. That you think: pff, okay, I'm off. We still talked to each other, but yes... You do feel that something is broken."
Read also

Kieran WoodDeputy Editor-in-Chief
Kieran Wood is a sports journalist based in Wales and has been active in journalism since 2022. He regularly contributes to DartsNews.com and CyclingUpToDate.com, where he covers professional cycling and darts. In cycling, his work includes liveblogs from major races, including the Tour de France, the Giro d’Italia, and La Vuelta a España, alongside race reports and analysis. He has also conducted interviews with professional riders.
His reporting spans the full racing calendar, from one-day classics to stage races, with a focus on accurate, real-time coverage and clear contextual analysis. For statistics, results, and historical context, he regularly uses resources such as ProCyclingStats. To support reporting on rider activity and training context where relevant, he also references Strava.
In his work, Kieran places strong emphasis on careful sourcing, editorial accuracy, and updating articles as new, verified information becomes available.
claps 1visitors 1
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- Uwielbiam patrzeć, jak wyjeżdża na czoło peletonu i zaczyna się rzeź...
Dariusz08-11-2026 - Yeah, unreal.
parisbound0008-11-2026 - there needs to be space in life for pointless comments!Ketterechts08-11-2026
- That is a very lazy way of putting it but so far on this website it seems like everyone is happy to look at everything lazily, even things that annoy them intensely. All they want to do is state their feeling and position but ask most to analyse a problem or come up with solutions or improvements and you’re stunned by silence. Nobody even really knows how this all happens. It’s very simple and quick to just say the UCI did it but I bet you they didn’t, I bet you not more than 2 people were involved, more likely just 1. The UCI may be ultimately responsible but it is not their decision, this is about hierarchy, power and delegation. The fact that protest is possible also means it isn’t over and that MORE people could get involved for a thorough review which could throw up anything. It is highly likely it was a sole commissar who decided and has that power in a first round. Therein might lie the problem the UCI has to consider, is it acceptable to give so much authority to one single person when it is quite possible for them to have a natural bias or be too easily susceptible to imposed bias. Who is to say an individual in this position isn’t susceptible to collaboration with outside players with interests in the results, nations, families, teams, betting companies, etc. On the one hand we have sports where these problems have been worked on way more to reduce such problems, on the other hand we have sports with far stricter and more draconian rules not even concerning safety or obstruction that nobody really questions like false starts or stepping out of lane or zones in athletics. If cycling hastowork on itself, it would be good if protagonists (all kinds) would start doing a little more than just moaning over outcomes.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- Yes, so why not make comments less pointless?Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- What a race! I didn't expect Vanthourenhout to collapse like that, and Wyseure did take the fight to Nys, but there was no doubt at the end. I also wonder what Aubin Sparfel would be capable of were he to race in the elites now. In the U23 ranks he is making good work of Giel Lejeune, who himself is among the better riders in the elites, and a top 10 contender in the big races (3rd at Kleebergcross, 8th at Berencross and 5th at Heerderstrand). In the French Cup, Sparfel is significantly better than Romain Debord (8th at Koppenbergcross and 10th at the Euros) and Rémi Lelandais (12th at Koppenbergcross and 19th at the Euros).
Rafionain-Glas08-11-2026 - There really was nothing in it. Schreiber was so much faster, and Brand was fighting to stay in the wheel in the sprint. Schreiber did move a bit, but to say she closed the door doesn't make sense because Brand couldn't enter it anyway, abd she wasn't impeded.
Rafionain-Glas08-11-2026 - He should have been allowed to go to Movistar. Right now both arent a good fit for each other and are just wasting each other's time and effortabstractengineer08-11-2026
- Thibau Nys does exactly what Iserbyt is calling for
Rafionain-Glas08-11-2026 - i did not see it. was the relegation justified or an overly hard decision? and don‘t cross riders deviate from straight lines all the time? bumping into each others when they cut corners, etc … why being more strict with the rules on the finish sprint?Ketterechts08-11-2026
Loading
3 Comments








