Magnificent Mads Pedersen perfect in pink again at the 2025 Giro d'Italia, sealing a hat-trick of wins on stage 5
Cycling
Stage 5 of the 2025 Giro d'Italia has gone to the Maglia Rosa Mads Pedersen. In a brutal finale, the Dane secured his third win in five stages with a powerful final sprint.
The trio of Giosuè Epis (Arkéa - B&B Hotels), Lorenzo Milesi (Movistar Team) and stage winner at the 2023 Giro d'Italia Davide Bais (Team Polti VisitMalta) formed the breakaway of the day. Clearly though, the peloton was not in a giving mood, holding the attackers on a tight leash throughout the day, never really allowing the breakaway much leeway.
Behind the three leaders, Mads Pedersen led home the peloton at the first intermediate sprint of the day, boosting his lead in the Maglia Ciclamino classification in the process. Pedersen also took maximum points behind the break at the second sprint of the day, although he was made to work hard for it by Alpecin-Deceuninck's Jenson Plowright.
With just over 40km to go, things started to split up in the break as Bais attacked his companions. Whilst Milesi worked hard to get back on the wheel of his compatriot, Epis let the wheel go and dropped back to the peloton.
As soon as the climbing began inside the final 30km, the back door of the peloton quickly opened, with sprinters such as stage 4 winner Casper van Uden, Milan Fretin, Sam Bennett, Matteo Moschetti and Olav Kooij immediately starting to struggle. Mads Pedersen also found himself right at the back of the peloton by the summit of the cat 4 Montescaglioso.
With UAE Team Emirates - XRG keeping a fierce pace after the climb, there were some notable splits in the peloton, with some big-name riders caught out behind including Wout van Aert and Antonio Tiberi. Thankfully for those however, the splits were mostly undone by the time the peloton hit the final 20km of the day. These accelerations though, had brought Bais and Milesi right back into sight, just around 30 seconds up the road. With just over 13km to go, both of them were caught.
At just over 4km to go, Van Aert dropped away fully, living up to his pre-stage promise of not being capable of fighting for the stage win. Because of there being no 3km banner of safety for the GC riders, the fight for positioning was rampant at the start of the final climb with Primoz Roglic himself going to the front at just over 2km to go. Although Mathias Vacek then took over the pace-setting, his team leader Mads Pedersen was beginning to drop back through the bunch.
By the final kilometre though, Pedersen was back into perfect position and onto Vacek's back wheel. In a three way battle for the stage win, Pedersen, Edoardo Zambanini and Tom Pidcock went the distance in the sprint. Eventually though, the powerful Pedersen proved strongest once again.
Read also
Results powered by FirstCycling.com
Rúben SilvaEditor-in-Chief
A founding contributor to CyclingUpToDate since its launch in January 2022, Ruben Silva has played a central role in shaping the site’s editorial direction and long-term growth. Before joining the project, he built his experience through independent blogging at Echelons Hub and by producing race previews for Ciclismo Internacional, developing a strong analytical voice rooted in daily engagement with professional cycling.
Beyond editorial work, he has been closely involved in the expansion and coordination of CyclingUpToDate’s wider network, helping establish and support sister platforms across multiple languages. This includes ongoing collaboration with CiclismoAlDia (Spanish), CiclismoAtual (Portuguese), WielrennenUpToDate (Dutch), and RadsportAktuell (German), contributing to a shared editorial vision and consistent international coverage.
He also helps oversee editorial governance across the network, setting standards for accuracy and consistency and coordinating updates or corrections when needed.
Originally from the Porto metropolitan area in Portugal, he holds a bachelor’s degree in Geography. His path into cycling journalism was shaped not through formal media training, but through independent reporting, community engagement, and sustained on-the-ground involvement in the sport.
Over the course of his career, he has conducted approximately 100 interviews across road cycling and cyclocross, ranging from one-to-one conversations and online formats to press conferences and on-site pre- and post-race coverage. His interviews include leading riders, team managers, and prominent figures within cycling media: Tadej Pogacar, Jonas Vingegaard, Mathieu van der Poel, Primoz Roglic, Wout van Aert, Joao Almeida and Tom Pidcock; managers like Patrick Lefevere and Joxean Matxin; and YouTube personality Bryan Kennedy (BKXC)...
Within 18 months of launch, he helped grow CyclingUpToDate’s English-language platform into one of the most-read cycling news websites, built entirely from the ground up. As both a professional journalist and lifelong cycling enthusiast, his focus remains on delivering accurate, timely, and well-contextualized coverage.
claps 2visitors 2
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- He should have been allowed to go to Movistar. Right now both arent a good fit for each other and are just wasting each other's time and effortabstractengineer08-11-2026
- Thibau Nys does exactly what Iserbyt is calling for
Rafionain-Glas08-11-2026 - i did not see it. was the relegation justified or an overly hard decision? and don‘t cross riders deviate from straight lines all the time? bumping into each others when they cut corners, etc … why being more strict with the rules on the finish sprint?Ketterechts08-11-2026
- seems like we are advertising the website with pointless comments…Ketterechts08-11-2026
- So?Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- The UCI do have their favorites.
Front24208-11-2026 - On a positive note, you maybe notice turning this topic into a discussion has the benefit of eliminating certain participants who do not see how they can turn it back to their sole interest ;-)Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- People see what they want to. I am actually the opposite of your accusation, probably more of a rebel than most of you who don’t get the big picture. The difference is, I don’t go moaning publicly about the consequences of my transgressions, I understand the need for rules and I take my OWN responsibility when deciding to ignore or break them or doing so involuntarily. I will also not hesitate to state my case or argue vehemently when relevant, sometimes it works, sometimes it makes things worse but that’s the price to pay for principles and having character.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- That may be but that was unknown to others and nothing says that’s the whole truth. Again, don’t try to misinterpret, it is a call and technically it is correct. Besides, even if there is a valid reason, that does not disqualify the ruling or punishment as far as the rules have been developed. I don’t think they’re as far as in football where for handball there is a distinction (in some ways and specific cases) between intentional or not. And football can be just as harsh and people live with it, eg the offside rule, also judged to within tiny fractions but often wrong or ignored. It’s the nature of every collective organisation and sometimes I wonder if our rebellion against it isn’t seated in the feelings we carry from the injustices we’ve felt personally, like being flashed driving 1km/h too fast when we are explained limits are just a security measure but we are absolutely certain not to have endangered anyone with our transgression. The problem is, nobody has better solutions and no 2 people have the same interpretation of where a limit should be.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- Because for you deviated implies the other rider MUST have been made to fall and fail to finish ??? I don’t know if you ride a bike but next time someone carves you up or drives dangerously close, just hold back from those feelings of changing something, reporting or filming or even complaining. Everyone will just say, hey you’re still here undamaged, doesn’t seem like anyone did anything.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
Loading
2 Comments