João Almeida BEATS Jonas Vingegaard on the Alto de l'Angliru - Red jersey unable to extend lead of UAE leader
Cycling
The Alto de l'Angliru promised and it delivered. Stage 13 of the Vuelta a Espana has created some very meaningful differences, but not between the two main favourites of the race. João Almeida led almost the entire way up the Alto de l'Angliru followed only by Jonas Vingegaard, but the Visma rider did not have the legs to attack and then also did not have the legs to outpsprint the Portuguese who won his first Vuelta stage.
The queen stage? Some have called it that, but what no-one could doubt is that this stage ended in the hardest climb of the race. The first high mountain stage of this year's Vuelta had over 200 kilometers in distance and a flat start, where over two dozen riders formed the breakaway of the day. Mads Pedersen was there, to the surprise of no-one.
Visma had the clear plan to go for the stage win and set a strong pace from early on, never letting the gap grow much above the 3-minute mark, even as the riders headed into the mountainous section of the stage - where first Q36.5 took charge of the peloton, and later on on the Alto del Cordal it was UAE Team Emirates - XRG who took the lead of the peloton. A small group went off the front on the first of the climbs, with Bob Jungels pushing the pace and Mads Pedersen joining them, later on scoring the maximum points on the intermediate sprint.
On Cordal, Jungels, Jefferson Alveiro Cepeda and Nikolas Vinokourov stood out from the rest, chased by Antonio Tiberi who would go on to crash in the descent that followed. The peloton was in a very reduced number by that point, as UAE began to put on the pressure to Visma. At the start of the final climb, the front trio had to stop momentarily because of yet another protest, although no Israel - Premier Tech riders were present at the head of the race.
Read also
As the Alto de l'Angliru began UAE showed their collective strength for the first time in service of João Almeida, with Jay Vine and Felix Grossschartner splitting the group up to less than 10 riders until just under 6 kilometers to go where Almeida took the front of the group. Only Jonas Vingegaard, Sepp Kuss and Jai Hindley could follow, whilst the others followed at pace behind in groups of one and two riders. Almeida's pace would drop Hindley and Kuss with 4 kilometers to go, before the steepest ramps of the climb at 23%. Almeida lead the race for several kilometers but was unable to crack the red jersey, and on the contrary, Vingegaard was not able to attack the Portuguese to extend the gap in the overall classification.
It would then be a downhill sprint finish between the two where Vingegaard did not let go of the wheel of Almeida, who went on to win the stage. Jai Hindley - third on the day - and Felix Gall, fifth, managed to take time on Tom Pidcock, bringing the fight for the podium closer.
Read also
Results powered by FirstCycling.com

Félix SernaCycling Journalist
Félix Serna is a writer at CyclingUpToDate and has been part of the team since 2025. He covers professional cycling across both the men’s and women’s calendars, with a focus on UCI rankings, race developments, and rider performance. His work includes interview-based reports, liveblogs, and tournament coverage designed to provide clear, accurate context throughout the season.
In his reporting, Félix regularly uses ProCyclingStats for results, statistics, and historical reference. He places strong emphasis on careful sourcing, editorial accuracy, and updating articles promptly when new, verified information becomes available. He holds a bachelor’s degree in International Studies.
claps 9visitors 4
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- He should have been allowed to go to Movistar. Right now both arent a good fit for each other and are just wasting each other's time and effortabstractengineer08-11-2026
- Thibau Nys does exactly what Iserbyt is calling for
Rafionain-Glas08-11-2026 - i did not see it. was the relegation justified or an overly hard decision? and don‘t cross riders deviate from straight lines all the time? bumping into each others when they cut corners, etc … why being more strict with the rules on the finish sprint?Ketterechts08-11-2026
- seems like we are advertising the website with pointless comments…Ketterechts08-11-2026
- So?Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- The UCI do have their favorites.
Front24208-11-2026 - On a positive note, you maybe notice turning this topic into a discussion has the benefit of eliminating certain participants who do not see how they can turn it back to their sole interest ;-)Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- People see what they want to. I am actually the opposite of your accusation, probably more of a rebel than most of you who don’t get the big picture. The difference is, I don’t go moaning publicly about the consequences of my transgressions, I understand the need for rules and I take my OWN responsibility when deciding to ignore or break them or doing so involuntarily. I will also not hesitate to state my case or argue vehemently when relevant, sometimes it works, sometimes it makes things worse but that’s the price to pay for principles and having character.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- That may be but that was unknown to others and nothing says that’s the whole truth. Again, don’t try to misinterpret, it is a call and technically it is correct. Besides, even if there is a valid reason, that does not disqualify the ruling or punishment as far as the rules have been developed. I don’t think they’re as far as in football where for handball there is a distinction (in some ways and specific cases) between intentional or not. And football can be just as harsh and people live with it, eg the offside rule, also judged to within tiny fractions but often wrong or ignored. It’s the nature of every collective organisation and sometimes I wonder if our rebellion against it isn’t seated in the feelings we carry from the injustices we’ve felt personally, like being flashed driving 1km/h too fast when we are explained limits are just a security measure but we are absolutely certain not to have endangered anyone with our transgression. The problem is, nobody has better solutions and no 2 people have the same interpretation of where a limit should be.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- Because for you deviated implies the other rider MUST have been made to fall and fail to finish ??? I don’t know if you ride a bike but next time someone carves you up or drives dangerously close, just hold back from those feelings of changing something, reporting or filming or even complaining. Everyone will just say, hey you’re still here undamaged, doesn’t seem like anyone did anything.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
Loading
12 Comments








