"Let go of the constant rivalry with Tadej Pogacar" - Fabio Aru advises Jonas Vingegaard to end 'Tour-centric narrative'
Cycling
As the cycling world turns its attention toward the final Grand Tour of the season, Fabio Aru — winner of the 2015 Vuelta a Espana — has offered some pointed advice to Jonas Vingegaard: break free from the fixation on the Tour de France and chart a broader course.
Speaking to TuttoBiciWeb ahead of this year’s Vuelta, the retired Italian reflected on both his own career and the current state of Grand Tour racing. While Aru acknowledged Vingegaard's immense strength, he questioned whether the Dane’s singular focus on Tadej Pogacar and the Tour is ultimately working in his favour.
“Winning the Vuelta could be a way for him to relieve some of that pressure and to break free from the Tour-centric narrative,” Aru analysed. “He should start targeting other goals — Liège, the Giro, for example — and let go of the constant rivalry with Pogacar.”
It’s a sentiment that may resonate with those who’ve followed the recent evolution of Vingegaard’s career. The 28-year-old has twice won the Tour (2022, 2023) and finished runner-up to Pogacar this year, but crucially — and somewhat symbolically — left the 2025 edition without a single stage win. Aru believes this is indicative of a deeper trend. “In the past two Tours, he may well have been even stronger than when he won — yet this year, he didn’t even take a single stage,” he noted. “The results speak for themselves. Tadej is making his mark.”
Read also
A Vuelta to Remember
This year marks the 10th anniversary of Aru’s own Grand Tour triumph — a dramatic and emotionally-charged Vuelta in which he overhauled Tom Dumoulin in the final mountain stage with the full backing of his Astana squad.
“It remains incredibly emotional — especially with the Vuelta visiting Italy this year,” said Aru, who will serve as an ambassador during the race this year. “We had a solid strategy and felt strong, but Dumoulin fought until the very last day. You don’t just drop a rider like that.”
His memories of that race — and the tactical nuance it required — inform his broader perspective on what Vingegaard and others face today, particularly in a GC landscape that has become increasingly binary, defined by the duopoly of Vingegaard and Pogacar.

Aru won the La Vuelta back in 2015
Shifting Focus
Aru's message is not one of criticism, but of evolution. He sees an opportunity for Vingegaard to diversify his targets — and in doing so, to free himself from the suffocating expectations that now surround his every appearance at the Tour.
“He’s capable of great performances, but we’ll have to see how he’s come out of the Tour and how well he’s recovered,” Aru said with caution, pointing to the lingering unknowns heading into the Vuelta. “It’s time to broaden his palmarès. Riders like Vincenzo Nibali built legendary careers by winning across different terrains and calendars. Jonas has the ability — but he needs to shift his mindset.”
Read also
A Word for the Italians
Looking to the next generation, Aru also expressed hope for two Italian talents: Giulio Ciccone and Giulio Pellizzari. After a strong showing in the Giro, Pellizzari is expected to take another step forward, while Ciccone — a proven stage hunter — received some tactical advice from the former Vuelta champion.
“Focus on a few select stages rather than chasing the GC from the start,” Aru advised. “Climbers like Vingegaard won’t leave much room for anyone else on the big mountain days.”
As the 2025 Vuelta a España approaches, Aru’s words serve as both a reflection and a challenge — to Vingegaard, but also to the sport more broadly. In an era increasingly dominated by head-to-head narratives, Aru makes the case for a return to strategic diversity, to calendar variety, and to a broader vision of greatness.
Because in the end, even for the most dominant riders, Grand Tours are not the only measure of legacy — and perhaps, not even the most meaningful.
Read also

Kieran WoodDeputy Editor-in-Chief
Kieran Wood is a sports journalist based in Wales and has been active in journalism since 2022. He regularly contributes to DartsNews.com and CyclingUpToDate.com, where he covers professional cycling and darts. In cycling, his work includes liveblogs from major races, including the Tour de France, the Giro d’Italia, and La Vuelta a España, alongside race reports and analysis. He has also conducted interviews with professional riders.
His reporting spans the full racing calendar, from one-day classics to stage races, with a focus on accurate, real-time coverage and clear contextual analysis. For statistics, results, and historical context, he regularly uses resources such as ProCyclingStats. To support reporting on rider activity and training context where relevant, he also references Strava.
In his work, Kieran places strong emphasis on careful sourcing, editorial accuracy, and updating articles as new, verified information becomes available.
claps 7visitors 4
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- i did not see it. was the relegation justified or an overly hard decision? and don‘t cross riders deviate from straight lines all the time? bumping into each others when they cut corners, etc … why being more strict with the rules on the finish sprint?Ketterechts08-11-2026
- seems like we are advertising the website with pointless comments…Ketterechts08-11-2026
- So?Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- The UCI do have their favorites.
Front24208-11-2026 - On a positive note, you maybe notice turning this topic into a discussion has the benefit of eliminating certain participants who do not see how they can turn it back to their sole interest ;-)Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- People see what they want to. I am actually the opposite of your accusation, probably more of a rebel than most of you who don’t get the big picture. The difference is, I don’t go moaning publicly about the consequences of my transgressions, I understand the need for rules and I take my OWN responsibility when deciding to ignore or break them or doing so involuntarily. I will also not hesitate to state my case or argue vehemently when relevant, sometimes it works, sometimes it makes things worse but that’s the price to pay for principles and having character.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- That may be but that was unknown to others and nothing says that’s the whole truth. Again, don’t try to misinterpret, it is a call and technically it is correct. Besides, even if there is a valid reason, that does not disqualify the ruling or punishment as far as the rules have been developed. I don’t think they’re as far as in football where for handball there is a distinction (in some ways and specific cases) between intentional or not. And football can be just as harsh and people live with it, eg the offside rule, also judged to within tiny fractions but often wrong or ignored. It’s the nature of every collective organisation and sometimes I wonder if our rebellion against it isn’t seated in the feelings we carry from the injustices we’ve felt personally, like being flashed driving 1km/h too fast when we are explained limits are just a security measure but we are absolutely certain not to have endangered anyone with our transgression. The problem is, nobody has better solutions and no 2 people have the same interpretation of where a limit should be.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- Because for you deviated implies the other rider MUST have been made to fall and fail to finish ??? I don’t know if you ride a bike but next time someone carves you up or drives dangerously close, just hold back from those feelings of changing something, reporting or filming or even complaining. Everyone will just say, hey you’re still here undamaged, doesn’t seem like anyone did anything.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- And we, what are we doing?Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- And yet, it attracts people, even you. What’s more, it attracts the rival fanboys to fill cyberspace with endless pointless my hero is better than your hero blabla that’s all been heard before and only helps sell the site as an advertising platform. You know what the solution is but most can’t resist. No different than women who follow and discuss celebs through gossip magazines.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
Loading
Write a comment







