"It's clear that right now the favourite to win is Mathieu van der Poel" - Lance Armstrong & Johan Bruyneel preview upcoming Spring Classics
Cycling
Lance Armstrong, Johan Bruyneel and George Hincapie have analysed what they expect from the spring classics, with a special focus on what Wout van Aert and Mathieu van der Poel can do in the Tour of Flanders and Paris-Roubaix after a cyclocross season dominated by the Dutchman.
Bruyneel commented on Paris-Roubaix and Tour of Flanders that Wout van Aert has put aside the cyclocross season and Milano-Sanremo to focus on the two monuments "that a Belgian must win." Reigning champion, Tadej Pogacar will not be in Flanders, so the van Aert vs. Mathieu van der Poel duel seems to be set in stone.
George Hincapie, former winner of Gent Wevelgem, gave his opinion: "Van der Poel has been unstoppable in the cyclocross season, but talking about the Classics, I really like Wout van Aert's preparation this year. Different, I think he has a great team around him, even better than van der Poel's for the classics. And Tom Pidcock, he seems more focused on wanting to do Grand Tours."
"I think he's going to focus on Liège-Bastogne-Liège, he has no options in the pave classics, not that he wants to try to win the Tour de France next year, but he wants to see how far he can go, see if he makes it to the top 5. He's the big favourite for Mountain Bike Gold at the Paris Olympics," Bruyneel said of the British rider from INEOS Grenadiers.
On the fact that there are some riders who can win both classics and grand tours at the moment, Bruyneel looks back to the Eddy Merckx era to see something similar: "I still believe that cycling today is more specific (in the sense that riders are specialized in a specific discipline and not in several) and that these guys are an exception."
"We should completely separate the cyclocross season from what's going to happen in the classics. I'm curious to see what happens with his new preparation, I've seen him in some races run out of legs with 30-20km to go. It's clear that right now the favourite to win is van der Poel, he's the one who has the most to lose. It's tough for van Aert, the press is very critical of him," Bruyneel concluded.
Kieran WoodDeputy Editor-in-Chief
Kieran Wood is a sports journalist based in Wales and has been active in journalism since 2022. He regularly contributes to DartsNews.com and CyclingUpToDate.com, where he covers professional cycling and darts. In cycling, his work includes liveblogs from major races, including the Tour de France, the Giro d’Italia, and La Vuelta a España, alongside race reports and analysis. He has also conducted interviews with professional riders.
His reporting spans the full racing calendar, from one-day classics to stage races, with a focus on accurate, real-time coverage and clear contextual analysis. For statistics, results, and historical context, he regularly uses resources such as ProCyclingStats. To support reporting on rider activity and training context where relevant, he also references Strava.
In his work, Kieran places strong emphasis on careful sourcing, editorial accuracy, and updating articles as new, verified information becomes available.
claps 0visitors 0
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- He should have been allowed to go to Movistar. Right now both arent a good fit for each other and are just wasting each other's time and effortabstractengineer08-11-2026
- Thibau Nys does exactly what Iserbyt is calling for
Rafionain-Glas08-11-2026 - i did not see it. was the relegation justified or an overly hard decision? and don‘t cross riders deviate from straight lines all the time? bumping into each others when they cut corners, etc … why being more strict with the rules on the finish sprint?Ketterechts08-11-2026
- seems like we are advertising the website with pointless comments…Ketterechts08-11-2026
- So?Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- The UCI do have their favorites.
Front24208-11-2026 - On a positive note, you maybe notice turning this topic into a discussion has the benefit of eliminating certain participants who do not see how they can turn it back to their sole interest ;-)Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- People see what they want to. I am actually the opposite of your accusation, probably more of a rebel than most of you who don’t get the big picture. The difference is, I don’t go moaning publicly about the consequences of my transgressions, I understand the need for rules and I take my OWN responsibility when deciding to ignore or break them or doing so involuntarily. I will also not hesitate to state my case or argue vehemently when relevant, sometimes it works, sometimes it makes things worse but that’s the price to pay for principles and having character.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- That may be but that was unknown to others and nothing says that’s the whole truth. Again, don’t try to misinterpret, it is a call and technically it is correct. Besides, even if there is a valid reason, that does not disqualify the ruling or punishment as far as the rules have been developed. I don’t think they’re as far as in football where for handball there is a distinction (in some ways and specific cases) between intentional or not. And football can be just as harsh and people live with it, eg the offside rule, also judged to within tiny fractions but often wrong or ignored. It’s the nature of every collective organisation and sometimes I wonder if our rebellion against it isn’t seated in the feelings we carry from the injustices we’ve felt personally, like being flashed driving 1km/h too fast when we are explained limits are just a security measure but we are absolutely certain not to have endangered anyone with our transgression. The problem is, nobody has better solutions and no 2 people have the same interpretation of where a limit should be.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- Because for you deviated implies the other rider MUST have been made to fall and fail to finish ??? I don’t know if you ride a bike but next time someone carves you up or drives dangerously close, just hold back from those feelings of changing something, reporting or filming or even complaining. Everyone will just say, hey you’re still here undamaged, doesn’t seem like anyone did anything.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
Loading
La anomalía que supone Van der Poel en el ciclismo. Roubaix, el monumento sin desnivel, pues yo detecto una zona de ataque en asfalto y leñazo:
1 Comments