"If they raced quietly the first 11 days Jonas would've been much closer" - Visma only have themselves to blame for stage 12 implosion says American ex-pro
Cycling
Team Visma | Lease a Bike had been constantly aggressive over the first 11 stages of the 2025 Tour de France, trying to put the pressure on Tadej Pogacar at any possible opportunity. In the first big mountain stage of the race on stage 12 however, all those efforts caught up with Visma badly as Pogacar destroyed the team on the Hautacam climb.
"Incredible performance from Tadej Pogacar, who did not let yesterday’s crash get in the way of his plans to put on a dominant performance. While he downplayed his injuries and how he felt, I will say from experience that 100 perfect limited his body today," analysed American ex-pro Tom Danielson on his X account afterwards. "Yes, he could have gone faster today. His team rallied strongly around him and absolutely they will even step up more this race after seeing their leader not let a crash get in the way. Based on how Tadej has raced the first part of the Tour and how he has set up the season, he will now get stronger each stage.”
In stark comparison of the strength shown by Pogacar however, Team Visma | Lease a Bike were, as mentioned, found lacking when the going got tough. "Visma continued with their 'scorch the Earth' strategy for the 12th day and while they destroyed the peloton they also destroyed themselves," notes Danielson. "Sad to watch Matteo Jorgenson caught in the flames and watch his podium hopes disappear in smoke. He literally blew and was dropped while his team was riding on the front.”
Read also
"Shortly after Jonas was dropped and lost the largest amount of time I can reminder in the first mountain stage. It begs the question does Jonas have any say in the strategy?" he questions. "Did he suggest stopping at any point or was he on board the whole time? I think moving forward the team must make some changes. I would be quite confident that if they raced quietly the first 11 days Jonas would have been much closer today and in GC.”
It's Danielson's belief that Visma only have themselves to blame for their implosion as they pay for wasted efforts in the previous days. "Unfortunately I think this depletion is due to using more energy than his rivals the first part of the Tour and likely will make the next part of the race more difficult for him," he says of Jorgenson. "The thing is that second in the Tour is a massive result and he truly is, the second best rider in the race. This is a huge accomplishment and I think moving forward Visma can shift their focus to helping Jonas ride his best and be his best."
"You can do a beautiful race still and everyone can race well and feel good. At this point anything less than that is living in the past and not healthy for anyone," Danielson concludes. "We all also find ourselves here and the solution to becoming the best is simply lock in on being our best until we finally get there. I just feel bad for Matteo as he didn’t need to be sacrificed like that. I hope he can get a stage win now."
Read also

Kieran WoodDeputy Editor-in-Chief
Kieran Wood is a sports journalist based in Wales and has been active in journalism since 2022. He regularly contributes to DartsNews.com and CyclingUpToDate.com, where he covers professional cycling and darts. In cycling, his work includes liveblogs from major races, including the Tour de France, the Giro d’Italia, and La Vuelta a España, alongside race reports and analysis. He has also conducted interviews with professional riders.
His reporting spans the full racing calendar, from one-day classics to stage races, with a focus on accurate, real-time coverage and clear contextual analysis. For statistics, results, and historical context, he regularly uses resources such as ProCyclingStats. To support reporting on rider activity and training context where relevant, he also references Strava.
In his work, Kieran places strong emphasis on careful sourcing, editorial accuracy, and updating articles as new, verified information becomes available.
claps 2visitors 2
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- Are you MrMauMau 2.0? Nothing you are saying is really relevant. Vaguely connected, but irrelevant. The conversation is whether Schreiber impeded Brand or not.
Rafionain-Glas08-11-2026 - He is boring
leedorney08-11-2026 - To Twoje przemyślenia te bla, bla :)
Dariusz08-11-2026 - Uwielbiam patrzeć, jak wyjeżdża na czoło peletonu i zaczyna się rzeź...
Dariusz08-11-2026 - Yeah, unreal.
parisbound0008-11-2026 - there needs to be space in life for pointless comments!Ketterechts08-11-2026
- That is a very lazy way of putting it but so far on this website it seems like everyone is happy to look at everything lazily, even things that annoy them intensely. All they want to do is state their feeling and position but ask most to analyse a problem or come up with solutions or improvements and you’re stunned by silence. Nobody even really knows how this all happens. It’s very simple and quick to just say the UCI did it but I bet you they didn’t, I bet you not more than 2 people were involved, more likely just 1. The UCI may be ultimately responsible but it is not their decision, this is about hierarchy, power and delegation. The fact that protest is possible also means it isn’t over and that MORE people could get involved for a thorough review which could throw up anything. It is highly likely it was a sole commissar who decided and has that power in a first round. Therein might lie the problem the UCI has to consider, is it acceptable to give so much authority to one single person when it is quite possible for them to have a natural bias or be too easily susceptible to imposed bias. Who is to say an individual in this position isn’t susceptible to collaboration with outside players with interests in the results, nations, families, teams, betting companies, etc. On the one hand we have sports where these problems have been worked on way more to reduce such problems, on the other hand we have sports with far stricter and more draconian rules not even concerning safety or obstruction that nobody really questions like false starts or stepping out of lane or zones in athletics. If cycling hastowork on itself, it would be good if protagonists (all kinds) would start doing a little more than just moaning over outcomes.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- Yes, so why not make comments less pointless?Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- What a race! I didn't expect Vanthourenhout to collapse like that, and Wyseure did take the fight to Nys, but there was no doubt at the end. I also wonder what Aubin Sparfel would be capable of were he to race in the elites now. In the U23 ranks he is making good work of Giel Lejeune, who himself is among the better riders in the elites, and a top 10 contender in the big races (3rd at Kleebergcross, 8th at Berencross and 5th at Heerderstrand). In the French Cup, Sparfel is significantly better than Romain Debord (8th at Koppenbergcross and 10th at the Euros) and Rémi Lelandais (12th at Koppenbergcross and 19th at the Euros).
Rafionain-Glas08-11-2026 - There really was nothing in it. Schreiber was so much faster, and Brand was fighting to stay in the wheel in the sprint. Schreiber did move a bit, but to say she closed the door doesn't make sense because Brand couldn't enter it anyway, abd she wasn't impeded.
Rafionain-Glas08-11-2026
Loading
Write a comment









