"I only know as much as you guys" - Chris Froome denies any doping allegations or connection with Operation Aderlass
Cycling
As if there weren't enough doping conspiracies in the world of cycling, another dusted case was brought back to life with relation to the legendary era of Team Sky. While we have little to no information about the investigation, the involved soigneur David Rozman is claimed to have been in contact with head of 2019 Operation Aderlass. This inevitably puts Chris Froome into a spotlight as the outcome could cast a shadow on his seven Grand Tour titles from last decade.
When asked ahead of Tour de Pologne, Froome denied knowing anything more than has been already shared with the public. "I've only seen what's been in the media, I only know as much as you guys."
Froome also denied reports that he had removed any images of himself with David Rozman from his social accounts after the story broke: "That's not true. Go on my social media. Go on my social media, they're all there," he insisted.
The Team Sky and later INEOS Grenadiers soigneur since 2011, was requested for an interview by the International Testing Association (ITA) during Tour de France in relation to the Operation Aderlass from 2019.
Read also
The Slovenian staff member immediately removed himself from the race, and the team later defended their staff-member in a statement, citing they had received "no evidence from any relevant authority", and so any possible connection remains only theoretical.
Before topic turned to Rozman, the 40-year-old Brit also commented briefly on his expectations for the race. "It's an important race, it's been almost 15 years since I was last here, but I'm looking forward to this week," Froome told Polish TV. "This is potentially my last season racing, so my motivation is high and I want to try and do the best I can this week."
"We've got some good opportunities both with sprinters and guys for the breakaways with my teammates. So I'm here very much in a supportive role to help them, guide them and use my experience to read the race."
Read also

Ondrej ZhasilCycling Journalist
Ondřej Zhasil is a cycling journalist at CyclingUpToDate and has been part of the team since 2023. He is based in Ostrava, the third-largest city in the Czech Republic, and covers professional cycling across the main UCI competitions, including the Tour de France, the Giro d’Italia, and La Vuelta a España. A key focus of his work is startlist analysis and pre-race coverage, where he examines team selections, rider line-ups, and tactical scenarios ahead of major events.
Alongside WorldTour coverage, Ondřej has developed specific expertise in junior cycling and in racing across East Asia, including competitions in China and Japan. He also maintains a broad working knowledge of other disciplines and levels, including cyclocross, while continuing to expand his understanding of mountain bike racing.
Ondřej holds a bachelor’s degree in Mathematics and Physics, which supports his analytical, data-driven approach to performance and race analysis. In his reporting, he regularly uses ProCyclingStats for results, statistics, and historical context. He places strong emphasis on careful sourcing, editorial accuracy, and updating articles promptly when new, verified information becomes available.
claps 107visitors 6
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- He should have been allowed to go to Movistar. Right now both arent a good fit for each other and are just wasting each other's time and effortabstractengineer08-11-2026
- Thibau Nys does exactly what Iserbyt is calling for
Rafionain-Glas08-11-2026 - i did not see it. was the relegation justified or an overly hard decision? and don‘t cross riders deviate from straight lines all the time? bumping into each others when they cut corners, etc … why being more strict with the rules on the finish sprint?Ketterechts08-11-2026
- seems like we are advertising the website with pointless comments…Ketterechts08-11-2026
- So?Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- The UCI do have their favorites.
Front24208-11-2026 - On a positive note, you maybe notice turning this topic into a discussion has the benefit of eliminating certain participants who do not see how they can turn it back to their sole interest ;-)Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- People see what they want to. I am actually the opposite of your accusation, probably more of a rebel than most of you who don’t get the big picture. The difference is, I don’t go moaning publicly about the consequences of my transgressions, I understand the need for rules and I take my OWN responsibility when deciding to ignore or break them or doing so involuntarily. I will also not hesitate to state my case or argue vehemently when relevant, sometimes it works, sometimes it makes things worse but that’s the price to pay for principles and having character.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- That may be but that was unknown to others and nothing says that’s the whole truth. Again, don’t try to misinterpret, it is a call and technically it is correct. Besides, even if there is a valid reason, that does not disqualify the ruling or punishment as far as the rules have been developed. I don’t think they’re as far as in football where for handball there is a distinction (in some ways and specific cases) between intentional or not. And football can be just as harsh and people live with it, eg the offside rule, also judged to within tiny fractions but often wrong or ignored. It’s the nature of every collective organisation and sometimes I wonder if our rebellion against it isn’t seated in the feelings we carry from the injustices we’ve felt personally, like being flashed driving 1km/h too fast when we are explained limits are just a security measure but we are absolutely certain not to have endangered anyone with our transgression. The problem is, nobody has better solutions and no 2 people have the same interpretation of where a limit should be.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- Because for you deviated implies the other rider MUST have been made to fall and fail to finish ??? I don’t know if you ride a bike but next time someone carves you up or drives dangerously close, just hold back from those feelings of changing something, reporting or filming or even complaining. Everyone will just say, hey you’re still here undamaged, doesn’t seem like anyone did anything.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
Loading
Write a comment








